• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

I think I'll go to Kansas to vacation this summer...

theHiredMansWife

Well-known member
My apologies for having a life beyond the board. :roll:
If you'll note, my only contribution to the thread was to correct an out-of-stater's mistaken impression than a native wouldn't fit in in her own state.

So far as an avenger of ridicule, a single snipe doesn't really warrant my concern. What bothers me is when people gang up on someone.
I believe this is what I've said before, is it not?
And if it seems only "conservatives" do that... Well, you might be on to something...
confused-smiley-013.gif

(though I will say, most of the conservatives on this board don't seem inclined to participate in that sort of juvenile behavior...)
 

CattleRMe

Well-known member
Red Robin said:
kolanuraven said:
Why don't you worry about child abuse, spousal abuse, hunger....things that ARE NOT A CHOICE........instead of what people do of their own free will and CHOICE???
Of the three threads that have mentioned or are about homosexuality, none of them have been started by me. Go look at the threads. They were all started or the topic was broached by gay right supporters. The question is why don't You and your buddies quit bringing the topic up if you don't want to talk about it. I have another idea , when you see a thread steer toward homosexuality, don't look at it again. You'll be so happy then.

Is it supporting it or just saying why don't people stay out of other's personal lives. I no more wanna know what a heterosexual does in their bedroom then a homosexual. If it's not in my bedroom it's not my business. :wink:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
theHiredMansWife said:
My apologies for having a life beyond the board. :roll:
If you'll note, my only contribution to the thread was to correct an out-of-stater's mistaken impression than a native wouldn't fit in in her own state.

So far as an avenger of ridicule, a single snipe doesn't really warrant my concern. What bothers me is when people gang up on someone.
I believe this is what I've said before, is it not?
And if it seems only "conservatives" do that... Well, you might be on to something...
confused-smiley-013.gif

(though I will say, most of the conservatives on this board don't seem inclined to participate in that sort of juvenile behavior...)
You don't have to apologize. But with all of those keystrokes you just used up with another cute little snide post, you've missed another great opportunity to demonstrate your superior moral and intellectual authority and scold someone. Scold someone for starting a thread that doesn't meet your personal 'thread intent' standards.

Or do your standards only apply to conservatives? That must be it....as evidenced by your continued failure to make your normal(?) judgmental comments about the 'intent' of this thread. An obvious intent to ridicule RR for having strong beliefs and the resolve to put the money where the mouth is.

Or maybe we should just assume that you are no longer the resident 'thread intent' policeman. Could that be it? Hmmm. So many possibilities...

Let's do this...let's just assume that your previous concerns regarding 'intent' with threads started by conservatives was only a coincidence. Surely, it doesn't represent a double standard or hypocrisy on your part?



theHiredMansWife said:
You're started this thread to berate a person, rather than discussing the points he brought up.
http://ranchers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=72326#72326


theHiredMansWife said:
Look at the title--This thread was created for the sole purpose of attacking her. And several people wandered in to oblige.
I can see where she might get a bit snarky...
confused-smiley-013.gif
http://ranchers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=90865#90865


theHiredMansWife said:
Have you ever noticed that most of the threads you start are for the sole purpose of ridiculing people?
http://ranchers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=84537#84537


theHiredMansWife said:
And frankly, someone who creates a whole thread for the purpose of trying to denigrate others would strike me as an elitist....
Just something you might want to consider.
http://ranchers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=77021#77021


theHiredMansWife said:
What was your purpose for starting this thread, then? :???:
http://ranchers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=95811#95811


Or perhaps it was just a stage you were going through and now you have outgrown it? :lol:
 

theHiredMansWife

Well-known member
I guess I haven't noticed where it's either a habitual thing for people to gang up on RR, or where the chief starts multitudes of threads for the sheer joy of being nasty to people.
It might seem like a double standard to you, but to me it seems more along the lines of the squeaky wheel gets smacked with the hammer.
:lol:
If you don't like it, quit squeaking.
 

Red Robin

Well-known member
CattleRMe said:
Red Robin said:
kolanuraven said:
Why don't you worry about child abuse, spousal abuse, hunger....things that ARE NOT A CHOICE........instead of what people do of their own free will and CHOICE???
Of the three threads that have mentioned or are about homosexuality, none of them have been started by me. Go look at the threads. They were all started or the topic was broached by gay right supporters. The question is why don't You and your buddies quit bringing the topic up if you don't want to talk about it. I have another idea , when you see a thread steer toward homosexuality, don't look at it again. You'll be so happy then.

Is it supporting it or just saying why don't people stay out of other's personal lives. I no more wanna know what a heterosexual does in their bedroom then a homosexual. If it's not in my bedroom it's not my business. :wink:
I certainly may have you read all wrong. I thought you were for the right for homo's to marry. I thought you were for the right for homosexuals to have health care like spousal coverage. I thought you were for the right for homosexuals to have the same rights as heterosexuals. I personally am against those rights. I don't think deviate behavior should be rewarded . I guess if you are for a don't ask don't tell then you aren't a gay rights supporter. Good , when we discuss these topics, you can keep your mouth shut. On the other hand if you support gay rights, why insinuate that you don't?
 

the chief

Well-known member
theHiredMansWife said:
I guess I haven't noticed where it's either a habitual thing for people to gang up on RR, or where the chief starts multitudes of threads for the sheer joy of being nasty to people.
It might seem like a double standard to you, but to me it seems more along the lines of the squeaky wheel gets smacked with the hammer.
:lol:
If you don't like it, quit squeaking.

Excuse me, hmw, but exactly how many MULTITUDES OF THREADS have I started on this forum? I see, hmmmm....ONE! And it was THIS ONE.
And I didn't get the SHEER JOY OF BEING NASTY. I was pointing out the incomprehensible belief that someone would choose a state to vacation in based on their political, religious or idealistic beliefs.

I'm glad you stated you have a life. Now pretend to use it.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
the chief said:
theHiredMansWife said:
I guess I haven't noticed where it's either a habitual thing for people to gang up on RR, or where the chief starts multitudes of threads for the sheer joy of being nasty to people.
It might seem like a double standard to you, but to me it seems more along the lines of the squeaky wheel gets smacked with the hammer.
:lol:
If you don't like it, quit squeaking.

Excuse me, hmw, but exactly how many MULTITUDES OF THREADS have I started on this forum? I see, hmmmm....ONE! And it was THIS ONE.
And I didn't get the SHEER JOY OF BEING NASTY. I was pointing out the incomprehensible belief that someone would choose a state to vacation in based on their political, religious or idealistic beliefs.

I'm glad you stated you have a life. Now pretend to use it.
In all fairness to HMW, I think you misunderstood her. I think her post was directed toward me. I understood her to be saying that you DON'T do that. But just this once you did, and she is willing to overlook it. Don't you feel lucky?

Good thing for you that you're not a conservative, though. Different set of rules apply in that case. :wink:
 

theHiredMansWife

Well-known member
Good grief...
X is right. You completely mis-read my post, chief.
Excuse me, hmw, but exactly how many MULTITUDES OF THREADS have I started on this forum? I see, hmmmm....ONE! And it was THIS ONE.
And I didn't get the SHEER JOY OF BEING NASTY.
That's precisely what I was saying...
confused-smiley-013.gif
 

the chief

Well-known member
theHiredMansWife said:
Good grief...
X is right. You completely mis-read my post, chief.
Excuse me, hmw, but exactly how many MULTITUDES OF THREADS have I started on this forum? I see, hmmmm....ONE! And it was THIS ONE.
And I didn't get the SHEER JOY OF BEING NASTY.
That's precisely what I was saying...
confused-smiley-013.gif

Well then, sorry. I guess that's why it is so hard to read someone's intentions in type rather than hearing it for oneself.
In the words of Ruth Buzzy, "Never mind." :)
 

Latest posts

Top