• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

I will Vote for McCain

aplusmnt

Well-known member
Bill O'Reilly changed my mine today. I was thinking if McCain got the nomination I would stay home and not vote in election.

But based strictly on Supreme court appointees and the effect it would have on America forever. I could not see letting Hillary or Obama appoint a couple supper liberal Judges.

I think as O'Reilly does that McCain would appoint more conservative judges than either Democrat would.

I also think he will be tough on Terrorist. So I will have to over look all the other Liberal crap he is likely to do.
 

aplusmnt

Well-known member
kolanuraven said:
It's a shame that you Rep's have no one on your side you can ' get' together & agree on!!

Shame the only choices you Dem's have is Ultra Liberal woman or Ultra Liberal black man.

Republicans do have a choice between 3 different political types. I just don't like the one that possibly could win. Dem's have no choices they are both basic carbon copies, just one is black and one is a woman.

I would hate to be deciding who would represent my party based on color and gender.
 

olderroper

Well-known member
kolanuraven said:
It's a shame that you Rep's have no one on your side you can ' get' together & agree on!!

And it is a bigger shame that our Dem controlled congress who now have the power to pass some laws in this country for the good of all are setting on their duffs doing nothing.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
olderroper said:
kolanuraven said:
It's a shame that you Rep's have no one on your side you can ' get' together & agree on!!

And it is a bigger shame that our Dem controlled congress who now have the power to pass some laws in this country for the good of all are setting on their duffs doing nothing.

Most have been filibustered by the Repubs-- same as the Dems filibustered the Repubs before when they had control....

Except they're all too lazy now to actually do a filibuster and talk for days like they used to have to do- now they have a new rule that all they have to do is holler "filibuster" and unless there is a 2/3 majority to break it - nothing happens.....
 

Work Hard and Study Hard

Well-known member
aplusmnt said:
Bill O'Reilly changed my mine today. I was thinking if McCain got the nomination I would stay home and not vote in election.

But based strictly on Supreme court appointees and the effect it would have on America forever. I could not see letting Hillary or Obama appoint a couple supper liberal Judges.

I think as O'Reilly does that McCain would appoint more conservative judges than either Democrat would.

I also think he will be tough on Terrorist. So I will have to over look all the other Liberal crap he is likely to do.

People ignorant enough to be swayed by radio shows should not be allowed to vote in the first place.
 

Work Hard and Study Hard

Well-known member
aplusmnt said:
kolanuraven said:
It's a shame that you Rep's have no one on your side you can ' get' together & agree on!!

Shame the only choices you Dem's have is Ultra Liberal woman or Ultra Liberal black man.

Republicans do have a choice between 3 different political types. I just don't like the one that possibly could win. Dem's have no choices they are both basic carbon copies, just one is black and one is a woman.

I would hate to be deciding who would represent my party based on color and gender.

Your racism is spilling out of your post, I guess the bible said hate blacks??????? Your kind is going to be the dinosaurs that died 5 MILLION years ago, and it's a good thing because we all know what radical extremism has done to the middle east. It's not healthy to train your own little GOD WARRIORS with AK47's. I didn't know Shirely Phelps Roper had cattle and frequented a rancher site.
 

MoGal

Well-known member
Not for me. I'd vote Obama before I'd vote for McCain and if its Hitlary or McCain, I sure hope there is a 3rd choice. Actually I'd prefer a 3rd choice over Obama as well.

I am not for amnesty.... I am not for being the global police and making the banking cartel rich while we're at war. I think global warming is a scam just a way to get a global tax. I'm tired of unfair deficit trading. I'm sick and tired of greed and immorality.

maybe if you all sign up over at www.loudobbsforpresident.org
we might have someone who would make a difference.
 

aplusmnt

Well-known member
Work Hard and Study Hard said:
aplusmnt said:
kolanuraven said:
It's a shame that you Rep's have no one on your side you can ' get' together & agree on!!

Shame the only choices you Dem's have is Ultra Liberal woman or Ultra Liberal black man.

Republicans do have a choice between 3 different political types. I just don't like the one that possibly could win. Dem's have no choices they are both basic carbon copies, just one is black and one is a woman.

I would hate to be deciding who would represent my party based on color and gender.

Your racism is spilling out of your post, I guess the bible said hate blacks??????? Your kind is going to be the dinosaurs that died 5 MILLION years ago, and it's a good thing because we all know what radical extremism has done to the middle east. It's not healthy to train your own little GOD WARRIORS with AK47's. I didn't know Shirely Phelps Roper had cattle and frequented a rancher site.

I am not the one in the Democratic party at the moment trying to decide on the Black Liberal or the Woman Liberal. That is the fight within the Democrats now not me!!!!!!

Only prejudice I see is the Liberal in front of their name. Two of my top 5 picks for President would be either a black man or a black woman. So I know there is no prejudice here. I would vote for Condoleezza Rice over any person running on either side of the aisle.

Ps. Condoleezza Rice is Secretary of State currently, I know you most likely do not know who she is :wink:
 

aplusmnt

Well-known member
Work Hard and Study Hard said:
aplusmnt said:
Bill O'Reilly changed my mine today. I was thinking if McCain got the nomination I would stay home and not vote in election.

But based strictly on Supreme court appointees and the effect it would have on America forever. I could not see letting Hillary or Obama appoint a couple supper liberal Judges.

I think as O'Reilly does that McCain would appoint more conservative judges than either Democrat would.

I also think he will be tough on Terrorist. So I will have to over look all the other Liberal crap he is likely to do.

People ignorant enough to be swayed by radio shows should not be allowed to vote in the first place.

When someone shows you the errors of your thinking it does not matter if they are on the radio, a message board or the are a 10 year old kid. A smart person listens to reason and makes adjustments in their thinking.
 

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
Work Hard and Study Hard said:
aplusmnt said:
kolanuraven said:
It's a shame that you Rep's have no one on your side you can ' get' together & agree on!!

Shame the only choices you Dem's have is Ultra Liberal woman or Ultra Liberal black man.

Republicans do have a choice between 3 different political types. I just don't like the one that possibly could win. Dem's have no choices they are both basic carbon copies, just one is black and one is a woman.

I would hate to be deciding who would represent my party based on color and gender.

Your racism is spilling out of your post, I guess the bible said hate blacks??????? Your kind is going to be the dinosaurs that died 5 MILLION years ago, and it's a good thing because we all know what radical extremism has done to the middle east. It's not healthy to train your own little GOD WARRIORS with AK47's. I didn't know Shirely Phelps Roper had cattle and frequented a rancher site.

Er - wasn't it the two of them that started playing the R & S words?
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
aplusmnt said:
kolanuraven said:
It's a shame that you Rep's have no one on your side you can ' get' together & agree on!!

Shame the only choices you Dem's have is Ultra Liberal woman or Ultra Liberal black man.

Republicans do have a choice between 3 different political types. I just don't like the one that possibly could win. Dem's have no choices they are both basic carbon copies, just one is black and one is a woman.

I would hate to be deciding who would represent my party based on color and gender.




Looks like you already make decisions based on color!!!!


You could have just as easily said an Ultra Liberal Man.... you scared of the black man??? :roll: :roll:
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
Work Hard and Study Hard said:
aplusmnt said:
Bill O'Reilly changed my mine today. I was thinking if McCain got the nomination I would stay home and not vote in election.

But based strictly on Supreme court appointees and the effect it would have on America forever. I could not see letting Hillary or Obama appoint a couple supper liberal Judges.

I think as O'Reilly does that McCain would appoint more conservative judges than either Democrat would.

I also think he will be tough on Terrorist. So I will have to over look all the other Liberal crap he is likely to do.

People ignorant enough to be swayed by radio shows should not be allowed to vote in the first place.



Credit where credit is due WHSH.

For the " pain in the arse" you can be....sometimes you do hit the truth dead center!!!! :lol:
 

Soapweed

Well-known member
kolanuraven said:
aplusmnt said:
kolanuraven said:
It's a shame that you Rep's have no one on your side you can ' get' together & agree on!!

Shame the only choices you Dem's have is Ultra Liberal woman or Ultra Liberal black man.

Republicans do have a choice between 3 different political types. I just don't like the one that possibly could win. Dem's have no choices they are both basic carbon copies, just one is black and one is a woman.

I would hate to be deciding who would represent my party based on color and gender.




Looks like you already make decisions based on color!!!!


You could have just as easily said an Ultra Liberal Man.... you scared of the black man??? :roll: :roll:

It isn't the "black" or the "woman" that scares me. It is the "liberal" bones in their bodies. I would vote for Condoleezza Rice, who is both black and a woman, before I would vote for even any of the Republican presidential front-runners. My only predjudice is against liberals. :)
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
Soapweed said:
kolanuraven said:
aplusmnt said:
Shame the only choices you Dem's have is Ultra Liberal woman or Ultra Liberal black man.

Republicans do have a choice between 3 different political types. I just don't like the one that possibly could win. Dem's have no choices they are both basic carbon copies, just one is black and one is a woman.

I would hate to be deciding who would represent my party based on color and gender.




Looks like you already make decisions based on color!!!!


You could have just as easily said an Ultra Liberal Man.... you scared of the black man??? :roll: :roll:

It isn't the "black" or the "woman" that scares me. It is the "liberal" bones in their bodies. I would vote for Condoleezza Rice, who is both black and a woman, before I would vote for even any of the Republican presidential front-runners. My only predjudice is against liberals. :)[/quote]



The above statement is NOT a news flash as I am one of those you are prejudiced against. This fact is known to all.

But what caught my eye was that it was not stated. in a general term as ' a man'....but ' a black man'.

Hillary was not called a ' white woman'....she was stated as just being a ' woman'.

Just something I felt the need to point out....the subconscious thoughts of some posters showing through.
 

Soapweed

Well-known member
kolanuraven said:
Soapweed said:
kolanuraven said:
Looks like you already make decisions based on color!!!!


You could have just as easily said an Ultra Liberal Man.... you scared of the black man??? :roll: :roll:

It isn't the "black" or the "woman" that scares me. It is the "liberal" bones in their bodies. I would vote for Condoleezza Rice, who is both black and a woman, before I would vote for even any of the Republican presidential front-runners. My only predjudice is against liberals. :)[/quote]



The above statement is NOT a news flash as I am one of those you are prejudiced against. This fact is known to all.

But what caught my eye was that it was not stated. in a general term as ' a man'....but ' a black man'.

Hillary was not called a ' white woman'....she was stated as just being a ' woman'.

Just something I felt the need to point out....the subconscious thoughts of some posters showing through.

Kola, I think you are getting my posts and A-plus' posts mixed up. He is the one that said black man, not me.
 

aplusmnt

Well-known member
kolanuraven said:
aplusmnt said:
kolanuraven said:
It's a shame that you Rep's have no one on your side you can ' get' together & agree on!!

Shame the only choices you Dem's have is Ultra Liberal woman or Ultra Liberal black man.

Republicans do have a choice between 3 different political types. I just don't like the one that possibly could win. Dem's have no choices they are both basic carbon copies, just one is black and one is a woman.

I would hate to be deciding who would represent my party based on color and gender.




Looks like you already make decisions based on color!!!!


You could have just as easily said an Ultra Liberal Man.... you scared of the black man??? :roll: :roll:

I have no dog in this fight, I am not a Democrat so I have made no choices. It is the Dem's that are trying to debate rather they will elect an ultra liberal woman or ultra black man. It is your party that is making the race issue. You never hear any policy differences between the two candidates all you hear is about her being a woman and him being black. This issue is between you Dem's as you try to elect your candidate.

Once it goes general election I will be willing to bet that the republicans do not play the race or gender card like the Dem's are doing amongst themselves. We will just point out the Ultra Liberal facts because that is all conservatives care about!
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
Soapweed said:
kolanuraven said:
Soapweed said:
It isn't the "black" or the "woman" that scares me. It is the "liberal" bones in their bodies. I would vote for Condoleezza Rice, who is both black and a woman, before I would vote for even any of the Republican presidential front-runners. My only predjudice is against liberals. :)[/quote]



The above statement is NOT a news flash as I am one of those you are prejudiced against. This fact is known to all.

But what caught my eye was that it was not stated. in a general term as ' a man'....but ' a black man'.

Hillary was not called a ' white woman'....she was stated as just being a ' woman'.

Just something I felt the need to point out....the subconscious thoughts of some posters showing through.

Kola, I think you are getting my posts and A-plus' posts mixed up. He is the one that said black man, not me.




I know it was AMinus...I was just pointing it out to you.
 

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
Soapweed said:
It isn't the "black" or the "woman" that scares me. It is the "liberal" bones in their bodies. I would vote for Condoleezza Rice, who is both black and a woman, before I would vote for even any of the Republican presidential front-runners. My only predjudice is against liberals. :)

I'll second that motion. Can we get her on the ticket?
 
Top