• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

I'm voting for John McCain because

A

Anonymous

Guest
I'm voting for John McCain because I don't think doubling the national debt in eight years is going far enough. If the nation is bankrupt, I can still use my dollars as wallpaper for the bathroom.



I'm voting for John McCain because I believe in the erosion of my civil liberties and the evisceration of our Constitution. You may see a national ID card the first step towards a police state; I see it as "orderly".



I'm voting for John McCain because I believe it's good foreign policy to use military might to keep order in the world, preserving my God-given right to unfettered access to natural resources from foreign lands, whether the locals agree or not.


I'm voting for John McCain because fabricating evidence and picking a fight with a country that neither attacked us, nor was an 'imminent' threat has increased terrorist attacks worldwide, while also allowing the safe havens and training facilities to flourish. This keeps Americans "focused" on the bad guys and justifies spending billions of dollars each year on "defense".



I'm voting for John McCain because the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians and the forced displacement of nearly four million more from their homes in Iraq means "freedom is on the march". We now have permanent U.S. military bases in the region and can stay there 'for a hundred years'
... Mission Accomplished!



I'm voting for John McCain because I admire the courage it takes to do an "about face" on every single principled stand he's taken over the years in order to get the crooks, lobbyists and polluters on board his "Straight Talk Express". Regular folks won't notice as long as the media calls him 'maverick' during the evening news.



I'm voting for John McCain because I think allowing lobbyists and industry lawyers to write our laws makes Congress more efficient. The massive tax giveaways to big oil, drug and insurance industries and defense contractors that move offshore to avoid payroll and other taxes is merely the price we pay for living in a 'free' society.



I'm voting for John McCain because I believe that regulating energy commodities might hurt our economy. Regulating orange juice and soybeans futures makes perfect sense; closing the Enron Loophole might upset our energy suppliers. I like having to choose between food for the kids, and driving to work!



I'm voting for John McCain because I believe in legislating morality. I want Uncle Sam in my bedroom! Besides, you have to admire a man that can leave his first wife for a blond cheerleader eighteen years his junior (an heiress who illegally helped finance his first political campaign) and still represent the 'family values' party.



I'm voting for John McCain because I'm amused by his lapses in judgment and memory. I like the way he masks his volatile temper with a pained, maniacal grin. I think it's cute the way he furrows his wrinkled brow and stares off into the distance as he forgets reporter's questions ...
 

hopalong

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
I'm voting for John McCain because I don't think doubling the national debt in eight years is going far enough. If the nation is bankrupt, I can still use my dollars as wallpaper for the bathroom.

From what I understand your bathroom has needed wallpaperd for several years, the news reports of your abduction and hauled away by the spaceship-CIA/FBI to those secret meetings have gotten old and almost unreadable anymore


I'm voting for John McCain because I believe in the erosion of my civil liberties and the evisceration of our Constitution. You may see a national ID card the first step towards a police state; I see it as "orderly".




I'm voting for John McCain because I believe it's good foreign policy to use military might to keep order in the world, preserving my God-given right to unfettered access to natural resources from foreign lands, whether the locals agree or not.

What do you suggest using to show that you are in control? Did you not use a badge and a GUN to intimanate all those speeders that you arrested in your county of 5000 when you were JOHN LAW, and don't you currently hide behinde a black robe to exert your supposed athourity as a JP?


b]I'm voting for John McCain because[/b] fabricating evidence and picking a fight with a country that neither attacked us, nor was an 'imminent' threat has increased terrorist attacks worldwide, while also allowing the safe havens and training facilities to flourish. This keeps Americans "focused" on the bad guys and justifies spending billions of dollars each year on "defense".

YOu have a pretty good record of fabricating evidence and picking fights withy anyone who opposes your view


I'm voting for John McCain because the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians and the forced displacement of nearly four million more from their homes in Iraq means "freedom is on the march". We now have permanent U.S. military bases in the region and can stay there 'for a hundred years'
... Mission Accomplished!

Gee no one realized the John McCain was president during the tiome you mention!! :roll:


I'm voting for John McCain because I admire the courage it takes to do an "about face" on every single principled stand he's taken over the years in order to get the crooks, lobbyists and polluters on board his "Straight Talk Express". Regular folks won't notice as long as the media calls him 'maverick' during the evening news.


Does this mean you will not be voting fo Obama he has more about faces than McCain


I'm voting for John McCain because I think allowing lobbyists and industry lawyers to write our laws makes Congress more efficient. The massive tax giveaways to big oil, drug and insurance industries and defense contractors that move offshore to avoid payroll and other taxes is merely the price we pay for living in a 'free' society.

Key word here is YOU THINK, what cut and paste did you dirive that from?



I'm voting for John McCain because I believe that regulating energy commodities might hurt our economy. Regulating orange juice and soybeans futures makes perfect sense; closing the Enron Loophole might upset our energy suppliers. I like having to choose between food for the kids, and driving to work!

Even more of a reason to vote for McCain



I'm voting for John McCain because I believe in legislating morality. I want Uncle Sam in my bedroom! Besides, you have to admire a man that can leave his first wife for a blond cheerleader eighteen years his junior (an heiress who illegally helped finance his first political campaign) and still represent the 'family values' party.


Well that just goes to show you just how far you have sunk in morality, You have an issiue with morality yet you still act like you have commited no trangression in life, just the fact you beat dead horse with 99% of your Cut and paste posts

I'm voting for John McCain because I'm amused by his lapses in judgment and memory. I like the way he masks his volatile temper with a pained, maniacal grin. I think it's cute the way he furrows his wrinkled brow and stares off into the distance as he forgets reporter's questions ...

Guess the truth hurts huh Oldtimr getting too close to home to you huh, Kinda like your repeating yourself and forgetting that you just posted that in another post, miscounting, missreperenting yourself

Even more of a reason to vote for McCain, You don't like him so he must be OK
:D
 

CattleArmy

Well-known member
I'm voting for John McCain because I believe in legislating morality. I want Uncle Sam in my bedroom! Besides, you have to admire a man that can leave his first wife for a blond cheerleader eighteen years his junior (an heiress who illegally helped finance his first political campaign) and still represent the 'family values' party.


Like him or not it is a double standard.

However the more I read about Cindy McCain the more I prefer her to Obamas wife. If only it were a race for the woman the choice would be so much easier.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
hotdryplace said:
'the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians '


OT; Are you calling our troops mass murderers?

Nope- just that their leader who lied and falsified info to bring about an unjustified war-that he sent troops half way around the world to invade a nation that had never attacked us or "presented any threat to the US" - the reason the US has no standing in the world now when they say anything about Russia invading a neighbor and former soviet state...

Troops only follow their commanders on the direction of the Commander in Chief...Its been pretty well recognized by most now- Conservatives and Liberals, Repub and Dems - and most the people of the world that the info given out by GW Bush to justify his war was not true- and that some of it ( like the intelligence report) was purposely altered and censored to propogandize and acquire support...


"Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger." -- Herman Goering at the Nuremberg trials
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
I went to the last night of the local Fair PRCA rodeo last night- and they had a 6 year old little girl from Texas (her Grandpa lives in Glasgow and she was visiting) that boomed out the National Anthem louder and better than any of those professional singers ever did...Just had the crowd froze for awhile....
Like the announcer said- whether you believe all our warmongering policy was justified- or you don't- all politics have to go aside and you have to give support and thanks to our troops - and little ones like that little girl give you faith in the coming generations....
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
I'm voting for John McCain because I don't think doubling the national debt in eight years is going far enough. If the nation is bankrupt, I can still use my dollars as wallpaper for the bathroom.

The author needs to take a calculator to all of Obama's spending proposals and consider what they will do to the debt. You want to talk debt? You ain't seen nuthin yet.

I'm voting for John McCain because I believe in the erosion of my civil liberties and the evisceration of our Constitution. You may see a national ID card the first step towards a police state; I see it as "orderly".

It's obvious the author hasn't seen Obama's comments pertaining to the 2nd amendment. Now THAT is erosion of civil liberties and a rewriting of the Constitution.

I'm voting for John McCain because I believe it's good foreign policy to use military might to keep order in the world, preserving my God-given right to unfettered access to natural resources from foreign lands, whether the locals agree or not.

What fantasy did "unfettered access to natural resources from foreign lands come from"? It's in the news that the US is paying for Iraq's reconstruction while Iraq's bank accounts are swelling thanks to their oil revenue. I also remember crowds of Iraquis welcoming our troops.

I'm voting for John McCain because fabricating evidence and picking a fight with a country that neither attacked us, nor was an 'imminent' threat has increased terrorist attacks worldwide, while also allowing the safe havens and training facilities to flourish. This keeps Americans "focused" on the bad guys and justifies spending billions of dollars each year on "defense".

It would of been wiser to let a rogue country ignore it's terms of surrender and rebuild it's weapons programs to assist any two-bit terrorist that wanted to strike the US. Talk about naive.

I'm voting for John McCain because the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians and the forced displacement of nearly four million more from their homes in Iraq means "freedom is on the march". We now have permanent U.S. military bases in the region and can stay there 'for a hundred years'
... Mission Accomplished!

The US did not slaughter hundreds of thousands of innocents and did not displace millions. That was done by fellow muslims. The author really ought to get their facts correct.

I'm voting for John McCain because I admire the courage it takes to do an "about face" on every single principled stand he's taken over the years in order to get the crooks, lobbyists and polluters on board his "Straight Talk Express". Regular folks won't notice as long as the media calls him 'maverick' during the evening news.

Google "Obama flip-flop" if you've got a month to kill....

I'm voting for John McCain because I think allowing lobbyists and industry lawyers to write our laws makes Congress more efficient. The massive tax giveaways to big oil, drug and insurance industries and defense contractors that move offshore to avoid payroll and other taxes is merely the price we pay for living in a 'free' society.

The author isn't telling the whole story (imagine that). McCain is trying to cut taxes for ALL businesses, not just the industries the author chose to single out.

I'm voting for John McCain because I believe that regulating energy commodities might hurt our economy. Regulating orange juice and soybeans futures makes perfect sense; closing the Enron Loophole might upset our energy suppliers. I like having to choose between food for the kids, and driving to work!

There does need to be changes in the commodities markets. What's Barry have planned?

I'm voting for John McCain because I believe in legislating morality. I want Uncle Sam in my bedroom! Besides, you have to admire a man that can leave his first wife for a blond cheerleader eighteen years his junior (an heiress who illegally helped finance his first political campaign) and still represent the 'family values' party.

McCain's wife doesn't have a problem with the divorce (which happens to 50% of marrages). Maybe she knows a little more about the situation than the author?

I'm voting for John McCain because I'm amused by his lapses in judgment and memory. I like the way he masks his volatile temper with a pained, maniacal grin. I think it's cute the way he furrows his wrinkled brow and stares off into the distance as he forgets reporter's questions ...

I'm not amused by the judgement Obama exhibited with the people that he chose as his friends and leaders. I AM amused when the "Great orator" tries to speak off the cuff without a promptor.

OT, whoever wrote sure as hell never asked themselves if Obama is any better when they wrote their points, and at times they are bordering on outright lies. This is propaganda that would make Himmler proud.
 

hotdryplace

Active member
'Nope- just that their leader'

OT, so you believe Bush ran around Iraq with a pistol and a bag full of hand grenades killing civilians instead of going to the ranch or flying a refurbished F102 dropping bombs on schools and markets during his time off. He must be the second coming of Genghis Khan to rack up a score of several hundred thousand by his himself because it wasn't the us military that accomplished this fantastic feat of genocide.
I've found your juvenal antics with the 'neocon', 'king george','Macsame', and endless pages of leftist propaganda mildly amusing and at times hysterical. I've even agreed with you during some of your increasingly rare moments of lucidity. However, you crossed the line into the extreme anti-military left either through ignorance or the willfull propagation of anti-american lies when you call our troops mass murderers.
Every soldier/pilot that pulls a trigger or toggles a bomb makes a decision to do so.
Apparently:
:you believe that a few months of training removes the mind and conscience from our soldiers and they become mindless automotons roaming around Iraq killing civilians on the presidents personal comand.
:you are ignorant of the extraordinary efforts leadership/training/restrictive ROE(Rules Of Engagement)/threats of judicial action, and judicial action, a soldier goes through to avoid civilian casualties. When civilians are killed the investigaters ALWAYS assume the soldier is guilty until proven innocent.
:you are ignorant of the extraordinary efforts to care for civilian and enemy wounded.
Although I know your not, other readers might be interested in a rational assesment of the casualties of this war.
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htatrit/articles/20080704.aspx
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
hotdryplace said:
'Nope- just that their leader'

OT, so you believe Bush ran around Iraq with a pistol and a bag full of hand grenades killing civilians instead of going to the ranch or flying a refurbished F102 dropping bombs on schools and markets during his time off. He must be the second coming of Genghis Khan to rack up a score of several hundred thousand by his himself because it wasn't the us military that accomplished this fantastic feat of genocide.
I've found your juvenal antics with the 'neocon', 'king george','Macsame', and endless pages of leftist propaganda mildly amusing and at times hysterical. I've even agreed with you during some of your increasingly rare moments of lucidity. However, you crossed the line into the extreme anti-military left either through ignorance or the willfull propagation of anti-american lies when you call our troops mass murderers.
Every soldier/pilot that pulls a trigger or toggles a bomb makes a decision to do so.
Apparently:
:you believe that a few months of training removes the mind and conscience from our soldiers and they become mindless automotons roaming around Iraq killing civilians on the presidents personal comand.
:you are ignorant of the extraordinary efforts leadership/training/restrictive ROE(Rules Of Engagement)/threats of judicial action, and judicial action, a soldier goes through to avoid civilian casualties. When civilians are killed the investigaters ALWAYS assume the soldier is guilty until proven innocent.
:you are ignorant of the extraordinary efforts to care for civilian and enemy wounded.
Although I know your not, other readers might be interested in a rational assesment of the casualties of this war.
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htatrit/articles/20080704.aspx

Are you aware of the reports coming out of the militaries own investigators- the Tagabu Report done by Major General Tagabu-- or the International Red Cross's report-- that both say the US is guilty of WAR CRIMES- that were authorized at the highest levels of government...
Or the Congressional Hearings that found out the torture being carried out by the CIA and assisted by US military people was a facsimile copy of the torture handbook practiced by the Communist Chinese in the 1950's :???:

The leader sets the direction for his team to follow- and if that direction is wrong from the start- it just keeps getting worse and dragging more people into it...
 

Mike

Well-known member
hotdryplace said:
'Nope- just that their leader'

OT, so you believe Bush ran around Iraq with a pistol and a bag full of hand grenades killing civilians instead of going to the ranch or flying a refurbished F102 dropping bombs on schools and markets during his time off. He must be the second coming of Genghis Khan to rack up a score of several hundred thousand by his himself because it wasn't the us military that accomplished this fantastic feat of genocide.
I've found your juvenal antics with the 'neocon', 'king george','Macsame', and endless pages of leftist propaganda mildly amusing and at times hysterical. I've even agreed with you during some of your increasingly rare moments of lucidity. However, you crossed the line into the extreme anti-military left either through ignorance or the willfull propagation of anti-american lies when you call our troops mass murderers.
Every soldier/pilot that pulls a trigger or toggles a bomb makes a decision to do so.
Apparently:
:you believe that a few months of training removes the mind and conscience from our soldiers and they become mindless automotons roaming around Iraq killing civilians on the presidents personal comand.
:you are ignorant of the extraordinary efforts leadership/training/restrictive ROE(Rules Of Engagement)/threats of judicial action, and judicial action, a soldier goes through to avoid civilian casualties. When civilians are killed the investigaters ALWAYS assume the soldier is guilty until proven innocent.
:you are ignorant of the extraordinary efforts to care for civilian and enemy wounded.
Although I know your not, other readers might be interested in a rational assesment of the casualties of this war.
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htatrit/articles/20080704.aspx

Just put OT in the same category as Murtha..........

They're both idiots. :roll:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Mike said:
hotdryplace said:
'Nope- just that their leader'

OT, so you believe Bush ran around Iraq with a pistol and a bag full of hand grenades killing civilians instead of going to the ranch or flying a refurbished F102 dropping bombs on schools and markets during his time off. He must be the second coming of Genghis Khan to rack up a score of several hundred thousand by his himself because it wasn't the us military that accomplished this fantastic feat of genocide.
I've found your juvenal antics with the 'neocon', 'king george','Macsame', and endless pages of leftist propaganda mildly amusing and at times hysterical. I've even agreed with you during some of your increasingly rare moments of lucidity. However, you crossed the line into the extreme anti-military left either through ignorance or the willfull propagation of anti-american lies when you call our troops mass murderers.
Every soldier/pilot that pulls a trigger or toggles a bomb makes a decision to do so.
Apparently:
:you believe that a few months of training removes the mind and conscience from our soldiers and they become mindless automotons roaming around Iraq killing civilians on the presidents personal comand.
:you are ignorant of the extraordinary efforts leadership/training/restrictive ROE(Rules Of Engagement)/threats of judicial action, and judicial action, a soldier goes through to avoid civilian casualties. When civilians are killed the investigaters ALWAYS assume the soldier is guilty until proven innocent.
:you are ignorant of the extraordinary efforts to care for civilian and enemy wounded.
Although I know your not, other readers might be interested in a rational assesment of the casualties of this war.
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htatrit/articles/20080704.aspx

Just put OT in the same category as Murtha..........

They're both idiots. :roll:

Well I feel I fall in with a lot of pretty good idiots-- like many Generals retired and still serving- Congressman Paul, Jones, Rohrbacher, Barr, and many many others... I heard Colin Powell being interviewed the other night- and he said he did everything possible including a 3 hours sit down with King George to dissuade him from invading Iraq- especially unilaterally and without a UN sanctioned mandate-- but he done it anyway :roll: ...But after 4 years of incompetent mismanagement and disagreement- he had asked the President to get someone else....

But since neocons use Goering's definition- these folks are now all classified as unpatriotic and traitors....

"Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger." -- Herman Goering at the Nuremberg trials
 

Latest posts

Top