• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Immigration Bill: Skewed For Democrats

Mike

Well-known member
Some say Rubio is lying about the Bill. But the again it's over 1500 pages and no one has read it yet. Sound familiar?


The immigration proposal pending in Congress would transform the nation’s political landscape for a generation or more — pumping as many as 11 million new Hispanic voters into the electorate a decade from now in ways that, if current trends hold, would produce an electoral bonanza for Democrats and cripple Republican prospects in many states they now win easily.
Beneath the philosophical debates about amnesty and border security, there are brass-tacks partisan calculations driving the thinking of lawmakers in both parties over comprehensive immigration reform, which in its current form offers a pathway to citizenship — and full voting rights — for a group of undocumented residents that roughly equals the population of Ohio, the nation’s seventh-largest state.

If these people had been on the voting rolls in 2012 and voted along the same lines as other Hispanic voters did last fall, President Barack Obama’s relatively narrow victory last fall would have been considerably wider, a POLITICO analysis showed.

Key swing states that Obama fought tooth and nail to win — like Florida, Colorado and Nevada — would have been comfortably in his column. And the president would have come very close to winning Arizona.
Republican Mitt Romney, by contrast, would have lost the national popular vote by 7 percentage points, 53 percent to 46 percent, instead of the 4-point margin he lost by in 2012, and would have struggled even to stay competitive in GOP strongholds like Texas, which he won with 57 percent of the vote.
The analysis is based on U.S. Census and Pew Research Center estimates of illegal immigrant populations by state, and presidential exit polls showing how Obama and Romney performed among Latinos.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/immigration-reform-could-upend-electoral-college-90478.html#ixzz2RIXJogh8
 

flounder

Well-known member
mr. anonymous, why are you still here ?

moderator said anyone making terroristic threats would be banned.

why are you still here ?


can someone please explain to me what mr. anonymous (mike) has on the owner of this board?


why is it mr. anonymous (mike), can make terroristic threats here, yet still be here, after what the owner of this board plainly states ;





Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2013 9:41 am Post subject: Re: Assassination Posts

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

M Gravlee wrote:

The Secret Service takes assassination threats very seriously. So do we. Anyone posting that a political figure should be shot will be banned.





what about suggesting to blow a group up with a pressure cooker ???




Mike
Rancher



Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 20217
Location: Montgomery, Al
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:25 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What the hell could those Westboro kooks be protesting?

Someone should concoct a nice little package out of a pressure cooker for them!



_________________
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.







http://ranchers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=64711




Mike
Rancher



Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 19886
Location: Montgomery, Al
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 8:19 pm Post subject: Guess the Rep's Color

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Needs to be a Low or High Tech lynching of an uppity Black State Representative.

Quote:
State Rep. Joe Mitchell, D-Mobile, had an outlandish exchange via email with a Jefferson County man who asked him and other lawmakers not to pass any laws that would restrict gun ownership.

Eddie Maxwell sent a mass email to state legislators at 10:54 p.m. on Jan. 27, warning them that even attempting to introduce a gun control bill was, in his opinion, a violation of state law.

Mitchell responded from his public, ALHouse.gov email account at 11:59 p.m., telling Maxwell: "Your folk never used all this sheit (sic) to protect my folk from your slave-holding, murdering, adulterous, baby-raping, incestuous, snaggle-toothed, backward-a**ed, inbreed (sic), imported criminal-minded kin folk."

"That’s not the type of reply I expect to receive from a state legislator," Maxwell replied on Feb. 11. "I’m not a racist and I find your reply to be especially offensive considering the position you hold."








http://ranchers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=64265









Oldtimer wrote:
Here is a PM message I received from Mike and my answer.... I guess after all the libel and slander he put out against me- with his favorite word "LIAR"--- finding out I had called authorities attention to the postings on this site finally got to him....

But after thinking longer of it-- this PB site in no way represents the rural/rancher community I know or the rural America I want to be associated with- so instead of arguing with the racists, homophobes, and anarchists- I'll let them have their way with all hate, fear and the personal slander and libel they put out.... I have some new cattle ventures I'm moving into- and don't need to fight with losers and wannabes....

But it darn sure won't stop me from doing my duty as an American citizen and reporting those that want to promote hatred and anarchy.....

Quote:

Sent :: Message

From: Oldtimer
To: Mike
Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2013 7:03 pm
Subject: Re: Cease & Desist

Mike wrote:
Richard Britzman
131 Britzman Road
Glasgow, MT 59230

I have saved numerous posts by you untruthfully accusing me of being a member of the "KKK", an "anarchist", and/or "threatening" to the authorities, and other untruthful statements by you.

I have also forwarded these many saved screenshots to my attorney and he agrees, it is time this is stopped.

With this informal "Cease & Desist Warning", you are hereby warned that any further written derogatories on Ranchers.Net or other public forums, business or persona,l towards me constitute "Libel", which is a written and published form of Slander against my good name and character, and that a Defamation suit will be filed in the proper jurisdiction, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama immediately and without hesitation.

What you do with this is up to you. There will be no more warnings.

Mike





Quote:
And how many hundreds do I have from you- accusing me of untruths- libels and slanders... Like my attorney said- there are two sides to the story........
And like my attorney said when old Tammy Faye wanted to threaten things cause her butt got puckered- it only takes a few minutes to subpoena all the last 5 years posts off the site....
And how do you slander an anonymous Mike- when you tell lies against me while posting and backslapping those posting my name and calling me a liar?... Sounds like I should be ringing up my attorney.......

GET OFF MY ASS THEN.... IF YOU STOP ALL POSTS MENTIONING ME- OR BACKSLAPPING THE YAPDOGS ATTACKING ME - I"LL SURELY DO THE SAME... ITS SOMETHING I WOULD DO FOR ANYBODY....BUT IT WILL NOT STOP WHAT I FEEL IS MY DUTY TO REPORT THREATS AGAINST OUR GOVERNMENT OR GOVERNMENT OFFICALS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT....


YOU YOURSELF MADE YOURSELF OUT TO BE WHAT THIS ENTIRE WEBSITE KNOWS YOU AS!


I guess if we want to play the sue game- everyone better hire an attorney!








http://ranchers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=64742&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=12




Let me guess flounder, your momma threw out the baby and kept the afterbirth



Larrry
Rancher



Joined: 23 Jul 2007
Posts: 5544
Location: The good ole USA




Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 7:11 pm Post subject: Re: Hey hypocrite poser ?



say there mr anonymous, you don't here me crying. ...
 
Top