WHY DO YOU CONSTANTLY HIGHJACK THREADS WITH YOUR INSULTS? What would have been wrong with fff and I debating this thread topic, in a civil manner, but here you go, I'll respond.
You don't seem to get the fact that I do believe some of the scientific evidence.
But I do not come to the same conclusion/opinion that SOME 911truthers have come to. Why do you automatically assume that I think Bush had anything to do with it?
You sure do have a lack of curiosity and reasoning ability for such a science buff.
Here's some other "foolishness" for you to attack. Maybe if they push hard enough for some "Truth", there will be less chance of such a tragedy ever happening again.
Are these people insulting you also?
Professionals for 9/11 Truth
* Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
* Firefighters for 9/11 Truth
* Lawyers for 9/11 Truth
* Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth
* Patriots Question 9/11
* Religious Leaders for 9/11 Truth
* Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice
* Scientists - Journal of 9/11 Studies
* Researchers - Complete 911 Timeline
And more from the families:
We want truthful answers to questions such as:
1. Why were standard operating procedures for dealing with hijacked airliners not followed that day?
2. Why were the extensive missile batteries and air defenses reportedly deployed around the Pentagon not activated during the attack?
3. Why did the Secret Service allow Bush to complete his elementary school visit, apparently unconcerned about his safety or that of the schoolchildren?
4. Why hasn't a single person been fired, penalized, or reprimanded for the gross incompetence we witnessed that day?
5. Why haven't authorities in the U.S. and abroad published the results of multiple investigations into trading that strongly suggested foreknowledge of specific details of the 9/11 attacks, resulting in tens of millions of dollars of traceable gains?
6. Why has Sibel Edmonds, a former FBI translator who claims to have knowledge of advance warnings, been publicly silenced with a gag order requested by Attorney General Ashcroft and granted by a Bush-appointed judge?
7. How could Flight 77, which reportedly hit the Pentagon, have flown back towards Washington D.C. for 40 minutes without being detected by the FAA's radar or the even superior radar possessed by the US military?
8. How were the FBI and CIA able to release the names and photos of the alleged hijackers within hours, as well as to visit houses, restaurants, and flight schools they were known to frequent?
9. What happened to the over 20 documented warnings given our government by 14 foreign intelligence agencies or heads of state?
10. Why did the Bush administration cover up the fact that the head of the Pakistani intelligence agency was in Washington the week of 9/11 and reportedly had $100,000 wired to Mohamed Atta, considered the ringleader of the hijackers?
11. Why did the 911 Commission fail to address most of the questions posed by the families of the victims, in addition to almost all of the questions posed here?
12. Why was Philip Zelikow chosen to be the Executive Director of the ostensibly independent 911 Commission although he had co-authored a book with Condoleezza Rice?
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633
There are many on PB that are sick of you coming onto PB and trying to squash the truth, when it comes to global warming, BSE, Food safety etc. You most probably found Ranchers by doing an internet search on BSE, and thought that you would come on board to attack those Ranchers who you believe negligent in your husband's death.
If I was into making assumptions about people, I would assume that you work for the government and are posting on PB, working towards some DC agenda. My guess would be FDA or some agency like it. You are most probably working for US taxpayer dollars, through contracts.
Quit trying to project your guilt and sins of being a conspiracy theorist on others.
If you are in doubt of what I believe ask, don't assume that I think as you do.
There, how are those for some assumptions?