• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Instead of aborting innocent babies, slaughter these creeps

Liberty Belle

Well-known member
If you "pro-choice" folks are so anxious to kill other humans, why not switch your focus from innocent pre-born babies to these sub-humans that are guilty of one of the most heinous crimes that can be committed.

I vote we fry them as soon as they have been convicted - and the sooner, the better!!

Child porn ring busted, 27 face charges
‘Molestation on demand’ reportedly offered via Internet chat room
NBC News
March 15, 2006


CHICAGO - Charges were announced Wednesday against 27 people in the United States, Canada, Australia and Great Britain in connection with an Internet chat room allegedly used to trade child porn and view real-time child molestation.

The accused allegedly exchanged videos of live molestation, or what authorities are calling “molestation on demand.”

U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, who appeared at a news conference in Chicago, said seven victims were identified, one of them less than 18 months old.

Gonzales said the images, sent through a peer-to-peer network, represented "the worst imaginable forms of child pornography."
Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents infiltrated the ring during the last year and began making arrests last week, the sources told NBC.
Thirteen of the suspects are charged in the United States.

The Associated Press said that arrests were made in Arizona, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Michigan, Nevada, New York, North Carolina and Tennessee.

The chat room, called “Kiddypics and Kiddyvids,” allowed users to share pictures and video.

Julie Myers, assistant secretary of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, appeared with Gonzales and said the trade in child pornography has expanded with the emergence of new technology.
There is more "home-grown child pornography" she said, and more new victims, with video and photographs shared on-line.

ICE took part in the investigation because the case involved cross-border crimes.
© 2006 MSNBC Interactive
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11839832/
 

Mrs.Greg

Well-known member
Personally that is disgusting! I read the other day Bill Gates is partnering with all police forces world wide to stop child porn on the internet...To Bill Gates :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
 

BBJ

Well-known member
:twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:


All I can say is stevec you obviously don't have kids of your own. And if you do then I feel for them.
 

Mrs.Greg

Well-known member
Yes Stevec Bill Gates made it possible for ALL of us...even you,without the intenet we wouldn't have the pleasure of your write-ups...Oh I see what you mean now about Gates :p
 

Cal

Well-known member
You all forget that stevec would not protect the innocent from torture, sexual exploitation, murder, drug dealers...anything. If any kids were unfortunate enough to be born to him, they're obviously on their own.
 

Faster horses

Well-known member
Well, Stevec, don't pat yourself on the back too hard. I haven't known a kid yet that didn't have to make their own mistakes to learn something. We had that right, why shouldn't they?

Please, don't answer. Just think about it.
 

CattleRMe

Well-known member
Just in my opinion but I strongly believe in capital punishment for those that do horrible acts to children. My question has been for years why do we as a society let child molesters back into society that the judicial system rates high to offend again? I don't think the manditory address publish in newspapers (in Nebraska anyway) of where they live keeps children safe the only way to keep them safe is to take the molestor forever out of society.
 

CattleRMe

Well-known member
stevec said:
Thinking people deserve to die is the first sign of sick thinking.

Anyway, in this case we have pictures of children being tortured (sexually) by adults. The people viewing the pictures did not carryout the torture, but if it is a crime to view pictures and take pleasure from them, then shouldn't the definition be held consistently to others as well?


I guess I'm sick. :shock:

You don't think it's a crime to be part of exploiting innocent children? It's not a crime to enjoy that violation of a child? If it's not it should be that is just sick and wrong.
 

BBJ

Well-known member
stevec said:
Faster horses said:
Well, Stevec, don't pat yourself on the back too hard. I haven't known a kid yet that didn't have to make their own mistakes to learn something. We had that right, why shouldn't they?

Please, don't answer. Just think about it.

I agree, they will make lots of them regardless of what I try to do. Some day they will be able to teach me mine, I hope. :)

Progress (wisdom) is a funny thing. We learn by refining our mistakes. They will certainly have the same opportunity as everyone else on this cosmic merry-go-round.

EarthAS17.jpg

:lol: :lol2: :lol: :lol2: :lol: :lol2: :lol: :lol2: :lol: :lol2:

Judging by your posts that picture must be what you see when you wake up every morning.

:wink:
 

BBJ

Well-known member
Wrong again stevie. The reason you punish, or as you put it "brutalize",a criminal is to deter others from that type of behavior. If people like you were in charge we would just simply catch the criminals then give them a nice room at the Hilton and beg them to act nicely. WELL IT DON'T WORK THAT WAY. You have to know by now that appeasement doesn't work. EVER! If we enforced the death penalty more often I promise you the crime rates would drop considerably. The problem we have now is that criminals know there are idiots like you out there that will try and protect them. And it ain't because the Empire caused them to do it, or they fear something, you really need to get a grip. So from what you are saying if someone killed a family member of yours you would want "JUSTICE"? Or would you just allow them to go about their merry way? BE HONEST! I know you can't answer that question just thought I'd ask.
 

BBJ

Well-known member
:lol: :lol: So all we had to do was "love" Hilter? :lol: :lol:


MAN I'm completely amazed that someone with your knowledge and expertise is here posting to a bunch of nobodies and not sitting in Washington informing our Empire on how to operate.

I bet come 2008 someone will scoop ole stevec up for an advisor. You guys and gals had better absorb his knowledge now before he moves on to bigger and better things. :D Right now there are scouts spying on this board learning about the great stevec. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

As for what you called the "marketplace theroy" yes I have seen it work. It works for me. The fear of what happens when you break the law keeps me from breaking it. Yeah I said FEAR.
 

Faster horses

Well-known member
The problem with LOVE and MERCY solving things is the other side needs to practice it too. Who was it that so aptly said "the best offense is a good defense"?

I have an idea for you stevec. Why don't you preach to Al Quaida? Work on the other side awhile and leave us alone. If they won't listen, try
Muslems; Iran; N. Korea; China. That would take you awhile. Take a trip, see what goes on in their world. Maybe they would listen to your BS, because, quite frankly, I am sick of it.

And I only read about 1/16 of what you write...
 

Jinglebob

Well-known member
stevec said:
There is nothing to be gained in any violence, and everything to be gained through love and mercy.

Stevec, would you defend your life or your families lives, if they/you were being attacked and the only recourse were to kill the attacker?
 

BBJ

Well-known member
Jinglebob said:
stevec said:
There is nothing to be gained in any violence, and everything to be gained through love and mercy.

Stevec, would you defend your life or your families lives, if they/you were being attacked and the only recourse were to kill the attacker?

He'd wet his pants, fall to his knees and beg. :cry2: :cry2: :cry2: :cry2:

Please don't hurt me (probably wouldn't care about anybody else) Mr. Mean guy, "I love you", then he'd quote something the attacker wouldn't understand.

That's just my opinion I can't wait to see how he answers this one.... if he does? :frowns:
 

BBJ

Well-known member
Told you JB. I knew he wouldn't answer it. I'll put it back up for him incase he missed it though. :D



Stevec, would you defend your life or your families lives, if they/you were being attacked and the only recourse were to kill the attacker?



waiting.............................................................
 

BBJ

Well-known member
stevie wrote:"my only recourse would be to die for them", so your answer is NO?

the question was:"would you defend your life or your families lives, if they/you were being attacked and the only recourse were to kill the attacker?"


A simple yes or no will work.
 

BBJ

Well-known member
I'm intirgued because I want to know if you can be honest with us here. And obviously you can't. Still waint for that yes or no. :lol2:
 

Jinglebob

Well-known member
stevec said:
You fear the boogyman, but you don't fear God.

Listen up stevec, who in the hell are you to tell me what I think? You don't know me or anything about me.

Don't be arrogent and ignorant, as some seem to be here, and try and put words in my mouth.

You come off as someone who seems to want us to believe you are holier than us, and smarter than us. Unless you are God, you are no better than my equal.

You have no idea of the life I lead or have lead. All you know of me is what you read here, and you don't know if I have lied or been honest about anything I have posted here.

Don't assume.

You spout the bible as if your the only one who can read or understand it.

Get over yourself and try a little humility.

When someone askes you a direct question, just answer it or say that you don't want to.

Don't tell me to fear the Lord. You don't even seem to understand what that means.

"Who should I fear, when the Lord is on my side?"

By the way, I don't fear the Lord. Why would I fear my father?

I do have love and respect for the Lord.

As for you. I am done trying to understand or trying to have a civil disscussion with you. You come off as a close minded twit, who in older times, would probably be a Pharasee!
 
Top