• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Interesting question

kolanuraven

Well-known member
Whose administration would you prefer to have overseeing the second half of the $700 billion bailout?


George Bush's 17% 13290

Barack Obama's 83% 63453


Total Votes: 76743





This came off of the MSN web/home page.

Bush says he's gonna ask for the rest of the 'bailout' money before he leaves office. I mean why leave money on the table :roll: :roll: .

Anyhoo...this was asked of the site viewers.....interesting response from lots of folks.
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
Sandman said:
kolanuraven said:
Whose administration would you prefer to have overseeing the second half of the $700 billion bailout?


George Bush's 17% 13290

Barack Obama's 83% 63453


Total Votes: 76743





This came off of the MSN web/home page.

Bush says he's gonna ask for the rest of the 'bailout' money before he leaves office. I mean why leave money on the table :roll: :roll: .

Anyhoo...this was asked of the site viewers.....interesting response from lots of folks.

You forgot to mention the polls were conducted where every other liberal tainted poll was taken over the last 1 and 1/2 years the food stamp office and gay bars. They darn sure were not fair and balanced.


The article didn't say the location. How do you know? Were you @ one of those places when the questions were being asked? How else would you know then??

What's wrong with food stamps? They've helped out a more people than have abused them in yrs past. They've fed a lot of kids over the years....kids that might have gone hungry without them.


You got a problem with kids eating food now do you?
 

ranch hand

Well-known member
What's wrong with food stamps? They've helped out a more people than have abused them in yrs past. They've fed a lot of kids over the years....kids that might have gone hungry without them.

http://www.cis.org/articles/2001/mexico/means.html
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
ranch hand said:
What's wrong with food stamps? They've helped out a more people than have abused them in yrs past. They've fed a lot of kids over the years....kids that might have gone hungry without them.

http://www.cis.org/articles/2001/mexico/means.html


Ohhh...so kids, thru no decision of their own, who were brought here by their parents, they can starve in your opinion?
 

ranch hand

Well-known member
So you are saying, lets open up the border, as I am sure there are plenty more illegal kids that can come over so they have something to eat. What about all the kids here that are starving, because the poor illegal kids get to eat?
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
ranch hand said:
So you are saying, lets open up the border, as I am sure there are plenty more illegal kids that can come over so they have something to eat. What about all the kids here that are starving, because the poor illegal kids get to eat?


I'm not saying anything about the border, yoiu're getting ahead of yourself...I'm talking the kids that are HERE....HERE AND NOW....ALL kids.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
ranch hand said:
So you are saying, lets open up the border, as I am sure there are plenty more illegal kids that can come over so they have something to eat. What about all the kids here that are starving, because the poor illegal kids get to eat?

Maybe GW should have thought of that rather than all the years he refused to enforce the border security-or his corporate buddies use of cheap "illegal" labor-or the fact he told the moneylenders and regulators not to enforce the law requiring folks wanting loans and mortgages to prove their citizenship/residency- resulting in bankrupting many mortgage and loan companies when they took the money and fled back to Mexico- which is the reason Republican Congressman Bilbray asked in the Congressional hearings why Bush shouldn't be indicted under the Rico statute :???: ....
 

jigs

Well-known member
the influx of illegals show a lax law enforcement policy. if it were legal to shoot anyone crossing that border, the flow would slow down considerably.

and if the sherriffs of this nation did thier jobs, they illegals would fear them,. and the public would not have to give them the boot.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
jigs said:
the influx of illegals show a lax law enforcement policy. if it were legal to shoot anyone crossing that border, the flow would slow down considerably.

and if the sherriffs of this nation did thier jobs, they illegals would fear them,. and the public would not have to give them the boot.

Its a federal law-- that does no good when the Sheriffs and Police detain them- turn them over to the feds that then write them a notice to appear in 6 months- and turn them lose.....Been happening for years both with Clinton and Bush.....

Guess how many appear :???:
 

hopalong

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
jigs said:
the influx of illegals show a lax law enforcement policy. if it were legal to shoot anyone crossing that border, the flow would slow down considerably.

and if the sherriffs of this nation did thier jobs, they illegals would fear them,. and the public would not have to give them the boot.

Its a federal law-- that does no good when the Sheriffs and Police detain them- turn them over to the feds that then write them a notice to appear in 6 months- and turn them lose.....Been happening for years both with Clinton and Bush.....

Guess how many appear :???:

NO if the sheriffs were like JOE in AZ who doesn't baby them, instead of Richar in Montana who turned his head perhaps things might have been different,
Tell us all oldtimer just how many illigals have you hired to clean your stall (SINGULAR) to work in your wheat field, while you set in front of a computor, finding cut and pastes????

Would you please inform us all just how you can run a ranch COW HORSE and a wheat field an still manage to accumlate the amount of post not only on here but the other 5 (that i know of) sityes that you post on? OH yes i foprgot to do the brand inspections ( NOT LISITED AS A BRAND INSPECTOR) IN montana, be a judge (NO record of any listing of acting judges) and still manage to accomplish all you claim?
Not to mention all the late night TV you watch to catch the jokes!
All the secret meetings you attend with the various agencies, or the sessions of congress you never fail to attend (another post in another site and your claim)
you have to be awake and moving 48 hours of every 24 hour day!
SLOW down old man slow way down you can't keep up that kind of pace.
Oppps forgot that kind of pace is possible when it is not true.
So go ahed and set on your butt and convince yourseelf you are really the expert!
 
Top