• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Iran Next?

Do you think GW will Attack Iran?

  • Yes- I agree we should...

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes- but I don't think we should

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

Ben H

Well-known member
If there ever was a war to be justified, this just might be the one. The left media picks and chooses what they want you to see to fit their agenda. How many people saw federal agents and police going door to door during Hurricane Katrina disarming law abiding citizens when they needed self protection the most. I'm just proving a point. You don't see hear everything that comes out of Ahmadinejad's mouth. You can't deal with this guy. He believes it is his religious duty to cause the fury on Israel to cause the conditions for the Army of the 12th Imam to come and conquer. I have said it before and I'll say again. People make the mistake of comparing Islam to Christianity and Judaism, it's NOT just a religion. It's a political system first and foremost and your duty to allow Sharia law to rule. The prophet Mohammad did not spread Islam peacefully.
Anyway I also want to point something else out, something that our former President Regan firmly believed would happen in his lifetime. True or not, this event could be happening sooner then we think, now you may think I'm nuts but I'd rather be mentally ready if it does happen, it's the prophecy of Ezekial 38-39. It's the one about the war of the Gog of the Magog. If you figure out who some of these nations mentioned in the prophecy are today that attack Israel then you'll find they are Iran and Russia, for the first time in history Russia and Iran are becoming closer and closer, Russia supplies weapons and nuclear materials, a dictator (Putin) is rising to power. There is a NY Times best selling author, Joel Rosenburg, that has written political thriller novels about events before they have happened. He wrote about a plane flying into a building in NYC, but it was 9 months prior to 9/11. Go to his website to read about his prior books then about his new one Dead Heat that talks about the current events that are brewing. He starts by saying he hopes the events in his book never come true. He also has a link on his site describing his interpretation of Ezekiel 38-39.

http://www.joelrosenberg.com/
 

PrairieQueen

Well-known member
I am reading that book now so don't give away the ending :D . I have not read the previous ones, but I will, Ha! nothing like working backwards. 8)

Let me ask everyone this, and I don't have a lot of time so forgive me if this doesn't come out very clear. Do you think a lot of these prophecies about the "End Times", the War of Gog and Magog, Rapture etc are coming true because the world has driven it's policies to make them come true?

For example, the State of Israel. Could it be that this prophecy about the rebirth of Israel and their great army etc is coming true because people want it to? Does the US support Israel because of what the bible states? What if the bible said something different about Israel, would we still support the state? Does that make sense?

Are prophecies (sp?) coming true because of or in spite of what we do politically and religiously around the world?
 

Ben H

Well-known member
I don't think all these events aligning are due to peoples decisions being based on the prophecies, I think there are just too many factors that lead to decisions on individual issues.

I haven't read any of the Rosenberg books, just about them.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
After 7+ years this adequately purports the faith I have with the GW boys to do anything right :???: :wink: :lol: :p

houston_problem4.jpg
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Israel Attack on Iran 'Unavoidable': Olmert Deputy

Friday, June 6, 2008 8:17 AM



An Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear sites looks "unavoidable" given the apparent failure of sanctions to deny Tehran technology with bomb-making potential, one of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's deputies said on Friday.


"If Iran continues with its program for developing nuclear weapons, we will attack it. The sanctions are ineffective," Transport Minister Shaul Mofaz told the mass-circulation Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper.


"Attacking Iran, in order to stop its nuclear plans, will be unavoidable," said the former army chief who has also been defense minister.


It was the most explicit threat yet against Iran from a member of Olmert's government, which, like the Bush administration, has preferred to hint at force as a last resort should U.N. Security Council sanctions be deemed a dead end.


Iran, which denies seeking nuclear weapons, has defied Western pressure to abandon its uranium enrichment projects. The leadership in Tehran has also threatened to retaliate against Israel -- believed to have the Middle East's only atomic arsenal -- and U.S. targets in the Gulf for any attack on Iranian turf.


Mofaz also said in the interview that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has called for Israel to be wiped off the map, "would disappear before Israel does."
http://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/Israel_Attack_on_Iran/2008/06/06/102217.html?s=al&promo_code=63E4-1
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Former German Diplomat: Israel Readying Strike on Iran

A prominent political observer is predicting that Israel is likely to attack Iran's nuclear facilities before President Bush leaves office.

"The threat of another military confrontation hangs like a dark cloud over the Middle East," declared Joschka Fischer, who was Germany's foreign minister and vice chancellor from 1998 to 2005.

Writing in the Beirut-based English-language newspaper The Daily Star, Fischer notes that a nuclear-armed Iran would be "Israel's worst security nightmare," and the Jewish state takes Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's threat to annihilate Israel very seriously.

He points to several factors that indicate Israel could be readying a strike on Iran:

When President Bush recently visited Israel as the country celebrated its 60th birthday, it was expected that Palestinian-Israeli relations would be the chief topic discussed. Instead, it was Iran.
It has been speculated that during his visit, Bush gave Israelthe green light for an attack on Iran.


Political pressure is mounting in Israel for action to halt the Iranian threat.

The outgoing commander of the Israeli Air Force has said that the air force is capable of any mission, no matter how difficult, to protect Israel's security.

With the Bush presidency approaching its end and uncertainty about his successor's policy toward Israel and Iran, the "window of opportunity" for an Israeli attack is potentially closing, and that window "is now, during the last months of Bush's presidency."
Fischer observes: "Although it is acknowledged in Israel that an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities would involve grave and hard-to-assess risks, the choice between acceptance of an Iranian bomb and an attempt at its military destruction, with all the attendant consequences, is clear. Israel won't stand by and wait for matters to take their course."

As Newsmax reported in December, Bruce Riedel, a former CIA official and senior adviser to three presidents, said after talks with Israeli officials that the Jewish state would launch an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities on its own if the rest of the world does not take action.

Fischer concluded: "Iran must understand that without a diplomatic solution in the coming months, a dangerous military conflict is very likely to erupt. It is high time for serious negotiations to begin."
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
Israel will hit Iran.....since they are our puppet/stepchild we'll ' rush in ' to assist our ' good friend' and thus that is how Bush will get in one last whack at destroying our country.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
kolanuraven said:
Israel will hit Iran.....since they are our puppet/stepchild we'll ' rush in ' to assist our ' good friend' and thus that is how Bush will get in one last whack at destroying our country.

Yep--The reason several of the Congressmen have bipartisanly been trying to get the Constitutional War Powers Resolution passed , which seeks to "prohibit the president from ordering military action without congressional approval, except when the United States or U.S. troops were attacked or when U.S citizens needed to be evacuated." It was introduced by Rep. Walter B. Jones (R-NC), Rep. Wayne Gilchrest (R-MD), and Rep. William Delahunt (D-MA)- and backed by Presidential candidate Ron Paul (R-TX) (who incidentally had the heaviest campaign donation support from military personnell of all the candidates) .....

But one way or another- GW is bound to drag us into it.....I just hope they let the military handle this one- and do it right.......My fear is he will screw it up again- get us several more war zones going around the world- that we don't have the military manpower to even handle what we got now- and end up with the next President having to start drafting our kids and grandkids off the street to go fight Bush's wars -- just because his and McSames principles won't allow them to talk to people they don't like .... :(
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
Iraq's Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki on Sunday tried to allay Iranian fears over a planned U.S.-Iraq security pact, saying his government would not allow Iraq to become a launching pad for an attack on its neighbor.


Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, right, greets Iraq's Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki on Sunday.

1 of 2 "Iraq today doesn't present any threat as it used to be in the times of the former regime," al-Maliki told Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad during a Sunday meeting between two leaders, according to a statement from the prime minister's office.

"Today's Iraq is a constitutional state based on the rule of law, and it seeks to develop its relations with the regional countries based on cooperation and mutual respect," al-Maliki said.

Earlier, Iran's state-run news agency IRNA quoted the Iraqi leader as saying that "Baghdad would not allow its soil to be used as a base to damage the security of the neighboring countries, including Iran."











http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/06/08/iraq.iran/index.html
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
Iraq's Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki on Sunday tried to allay Iranian fears over a planned U.S.-Iraq security pact, saying his government would not allow Iraq to become a launching pad for an attack on its neighbor.


Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, right, greets Iraq's Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki on Sunday.

1 of 2 "Iraq today doesn't present any threat as it used to be in the times of the former regime," al-Maliki told Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad during a Sunday meeting between two leaders, according to a statement from the prime minister's office.

"Today's Iraq is a constitutional state based on the rule of law, and it seeks to develop its relations with the regional countries based on cooperation and mutual respect," al-Maliki said.

Earlier, Iran's state-run news agency IRNA quoted the Iraqi leader as saying that "Baghdad would not allow its soil to be used as a base to damage the security of the neighboring countries, including Iran."











http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/06/08/iraq.iran/index.html





Not that ANY of this would matter to Dubya and Cheney....
 

Mike

Well-known member
I think the draft should be re-instated to build our military back to where it was during the Reagan years. Kinda like the Isreali do.

Would also take a lot of these thugs off the street and make a man of them.

The Muslims ain't gonna quit any time soon. :shock:
 

Latest posts

Top