• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Iran

Mike

Well-known member
Heard a little inside scoop on Iran from my son who has a friend on a "Boomer" sub.

The U.S. is sending a 3rd battle group to the gulf. That's a little over 150 ships and approx. 2400 nuclear weapons. Biggest deployment ever.

I say let's do it while we got the chance and still can.

Pelosi gave GWB the green light last week by removing the "Don't Go Into Iran" language from the Bill that went through the House and Senate.

They all know we have to deal with Iran sooner or later. Might as well get it over with............

Make glass out of Persia. This has drug on for over 25 years.
 

jigs

Well-known member
I think we need to let Israel do it.... but we warn Europe first! tell them they back us, or we pull all our troops out, and our money too!

why financially support countries that stab us in the back, time and time again?
 

Red Robin

Well-known member
I've mentioned this before without much discussion but somewhere , someday, this organization is going to come into play.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanghai_Cooperation_Organization
 

aplusmnt

Well-known member
Mike said:
Pelosi gave GWB the green light last week by removing the "Don't Go Into Iran" language from the Bill that went through the House and Senate.

They all know we have to deal with Iran sooner or later. Might as well get it over with............

Kind of like going into Iraq, deep down the Libs know what has to be done. Iran will be just like Iraq they will OK it, agree it needed to be done and then once the dirty work is done they will flip flop and politicise it and try to get more elected on the premises that the Republicans are war mongers.
 

Mike

Well-known member
aplusmnt said:
kolanuraven said:
Iran will be just like Iraq




SOOOOOOOOOO WRONG!!!! Iran will such a CF of the likes we've never seen.

CF ???

Does the "C" rhyme with "Cluster"?

I don't understand the statement either. Would take a fellow Georgian to translate.

And James Brown is gone. :roll:
 

Soapweed

Well-known member
aplusmnt said:
Red Robin said:
Mike said:
I don't understand the statement either. Would take a fellow Georgian to translate.

:roll:
You fellars are obviously lacking A education. :wink:


:lol: :lol: :lol:

The English language is amazing, due to the fact that one or two letters, randomly scattered here and there, can make such a difference in the meaning of a sentence. :wink: :)
 

Silver

Well-known member
Mike said:
Heard a little inside scoop on Iran from my son who has a friend on a "Boomer" sub.

The U.S. is sending a 3rd battle group to the gulf. That's a little over 150 ships and approx. 2400 nuclear weapons. Biggest deployment ever.

I say let's do it while we got the chance and still can.

Pelosi gave GWB the green light last week by removing the "Don't Go Into Iran" language from the Bill that went through the House and Senate.

They all know we have to deal with Iran sooner or later. Might as well get it over with............

Make glass out of Persia. This has drug on for over 25 years.

Why not N. Korea instead? They actually have the bomb. Why not China? What's the matter, scared? Terrible things going on there. The Cuba deal has been going on alot longer than 25 years, better crush them too. How about old Chavez, he could use a good old arse kicking. Venezuala isn't even that far away.
What about 6 or 8 african countries where things are going completely crazy. Africa is the one place in the world where intervention might acually make a difference but nobody will do it. Go figure.
 

aplusmnt

Well-known member
Silver said:
Mike said:
Heard a little inside scoop on Iran from my son who has a friend on a "Boomer" sub.

The U.S. is sending a 3rd battle group to the gulf. That's a little over 150 ships and approx. 2400 nuclear weapons. Biggest deployment ever.

I say let's do it while we got the chance and still can.

Pelosi gave GWB the green light last week by removing the "Don't Go Into Iran" language from the Bill that went through the House and Senate.

They all know we have to deal with Iran sooner or later. Might as well get it over with............

Make glass out of Persia. This has drug on for over 25 years.

Why not N. Korea instead? They actually have the bomb. Why not China? What's the matter, scared? Terrible things going on there. The Cuba deal has been going on alot longer than 25 years, better crush them too. How about old Chavez, he could use a good old arse kicking. Venezuala isn't even that far away.
What about 6 or 8 african countries where things are going completely crazy. Africa is the one place in the world where intervention might acually make a difference but nobody will do it. Go figure.

So you have no problem with attacking these guys you just do not approve of the order it is being done in? :lol: :roll:

From a serious stand point Iran poses the most pressing threat of any of the ones you mentioned. Each have separate ways that can be contained. Iran on the other hand is a loose canon that is not being led by a reasonable man. You can not go around saying how you are going to wipe a country off the map and then be allowed to pursue the resources that would make it possible for you to do it.

If there was ever an issue that we should all agree upon that would be the fact that Iran needs to be shut down at all cost. Basically we have a young Hitler in charge with a suicidal death wish.

I think that cleaning house in Iran is unavoidable, only question is will the Iranian people step up and do it themselves? Will Israel take care of it? Or will we have to do it? It will happen, Iran will not get a Nuke only question is who will stop it!
 

Steve

Well-known member
The U.S. is sending a 3rd battle group to the gulf. That's a little over 150 ships and approx. 2400 nuclear weapons. Biggest deployment ever.

Then the Iranians took 15 sailors hostage.....and we backed off....



"I think that cleaning house in Iran is unavoidable, only question is,..."

I think the real question is:,....Is GW putting the world on the brink of world war three....or Keeping Iran from starting it?
 

Kathy

Well-known member
Mike:

Heard a little inside scoop on Iran from my son who has a friend on a "Boomer" sub.

The U.S. is sending a 3rd battle group to the gulf. That's a little over 150 ships and approx. 2400 nuclear weapons. Biggest deployment ever.

I say let's do it while we got the chance and still can. Pelosi gave GWB the green light last week by removing the "Don't Go Into Iran" language from the Bill that went through the House and Senate.

They all know we have to deal with Iran sooner or later. Might as well get it over with............

Make glass out of Persia. This has drug on for over 25 years.


Wow, Mike, I am so disappointed in this comment and attitude. I am shocked.

When did God make the USA "ruler of the worlds' population"?

One reason Iran and other countries are rushing to develop nuclear energy/and or/ weapons, is because if they don't have them, they are under the constant threat of having them used against them by those who do. Since the only country to date to use an "official" atomic bomb against another country (in war) is the USA, the attitude that you have some Right to stop others from developing nuclear anything is ridiculous.

You know I despise nuclear development; the USA empirialistic adventures to control the development of other nations (against their own peoples' will) by force is so wrong it just isn't funny, Mike.

An attack on Iran (or any other nation's nuclear facilities) would contaminate the entire Earth's atmosphere with nuclear fallout and nobody has the Right to do that. Atmospheric testing of nuclear bombs (and even under-ground or water testing) by England, France, USA, Russia, China, Korea or any nation was and continues to be a crime against ALL humanity.

The get them first attitude is pathetic! Why don't you steal everything from your neighbors, heck they might want to steal all of your stuff someday.

Other countries/groups that want to do harm don't need to have nuclear bombs to do it.

I am in disbelief at the blood thirsty attitudes of people who think that they have the right to "strike" first.
 

Red Robin

Well-known member
Stick it in your ear Kathy. We can't all run through a field of daisies like you do all day. Live in the real world , if you can. Iran is a crazy country with a crazy leader that denies reality, such as the holocost. They are too stupid to play with dangerous toys. Someone has to stop them.
 

Mike

Well-known member
Kathy, I hope you have nothing against wearing burkas.

These people are intent on either converting us or killing us.

Which would you rather be?
 

aplusmnt

Well-known member
It is not only the U.S. that is saying that Iran can not have Nukes it is most of the rest of the world also. It is just the U.S. that in the end will be the one most likely that will enforce it.

Seeing how most other nations have no problem making the rules they just do not want to enforce them.

See Iraq as an example of that, U.S. did not make the rules that Saddam did not follow, all we did was remove him once he did not following the rules laid out before him that he signed from the U.N.
 
Top