• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Iraq War Simplified

aplusmnt

Well-known member
To simplify this Iraq War issue.

Bush said he would go after Terrorist and those enemies of ours that wish to harm the U.S. no matter who or where.

Question is do we support him in this endeavor? Yes or No?

Second Question is was Saddam a Terrorist? Did he promote Terrorism? Did he financially Support Terrorism? Was he an Enemy of the U.S.? Did he swear to harm the U.S.? Was he a bad man needing to be removed?

Bush did not just make us a promise to go after the Terrorist responsible for 911 but to go after any and all that could and would do or support FUTURE attacks.

Libs try to make this an issue of punishment for past crimes, Conservatives made it an issue of prevention of future Attacks.

I say wipe the word WMD from the argument the simple answers are above.
 

Ben H

Well-known member
why wipe WMD's from the discussion. Chlorine is a chemical weapon, and it has been used over there in that sh!thole of a sandbox they call Iraq. Why does the media ignore the movement of chemical weapons to Syria? That is a fact. Google it and you can find Sat photos of facilities before and after where weapons were moved to.
 

Soapweed

Well-known member
aplusmnt said:
I say wipe the word WMD from the argument the simple answers are above.

The Liberals get all bent out of shape over this topic, but it is a non-issue. Any idiot that can hijack a big jet plane full of fuel is a potential Weapon of Mass Destruction.
 

CattleArmy

Well-known member
Soapweed said:
aplusmnt said:
I say wipe the word WMD from the argument the simple answers are above.

The Liberals get all bent out of shape over this topic, but it is a non-issue. Any idiot that can hijack a big jet plane full of fuel is a potential Weapon of Mass Destruction.

Good point.
 

Latest posts

Top