lightninboy
Well-known member
If Not Plane Or Missile.......What?
Aldo Marquis CIT
Mar 3 2009
There was a plane and it did not hit. It was more than likely explosives, which can accomplish the "cone shape" damage pattern you are referring to.
Unless you would like to explain to us how the plane approached on the north side of the Citgo, struck the five light poles, showed up low and level across the lawn in the surveillance video, hit the fence/generator trailer with it's right wing/engine, and skimmed under the second floor and into the first floor causing the directional damage pattern outlined by the ASCE.
The human brain is often fooled. Magicians rely on that fact. So do con-artists and corrupt politicians and lying preachers and 9-11 perps and their devoted defenders.
The decoy aircraft flying directly towards Sean Boger in the helipad control tower and banking right above the light poles and overhead highway sign was at one place and the explosion at the Pentagon 1st floor at another.
The actual verified eyewitnesses saw an aircraft flying above the light poles and overhead highway sign on the north flight path and banking to the right and not an aircraft nor helicopter flying inches above the lawn on the official southern flight path at 535 mph.
Are there any explosives capable of producing the damage in, out, and around the pentagon in one large explosion?
I'm not an expert but there are Rapid Wall Beaching Kits.
Now I want you to list where these people were located, and the view they had of the light poles being struck.
As for personal incredulity, as I say there is no evidence that a pole ever came into contact with that cab. A pole dangling out of the front of the window would have helped.
No one saw the plane on the SoC path, no one saw the plane hitting poles. They saw poles lying on the ground, saw photos, or read news reports after the fact and then it turns into, "the plane hit some light poles on its way in" which turns into the pseudoskeptic saying "these witnesses saw the plane hitting light poles".
Walker Lee Evey
LEE EVEY WAS AT HOME DURING THE ATTACK. HE IS NOT A WITNESS. HE WAS THE PEN REN MGR.
Is it really possible for the plane to "try to recover" at over 500mph? If any of the 5 poles really affected the flight of the plane that would have been devastating and there is no way it would have hit with such perfect precision so low and level and fast to the ground as depicted in the security video.
http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/1308922/3/
Aldo Marquis CIT
Mar 3 2009
There was a plane and it did not hit. It was more than likely explosives, which can accomplish the "cone shape" damage pattern you are referring to.
Unless you would like to explain to us how the plane approached on the north side of the Citgo, struck the five light poles, showed up low and level across the lawn in the surveillance video, hit the fence/generator trailer with it's right wing/engine, and skimmed under the second floor and into the first floor causing the directional damage pattern outlined by the ASCE.
The human brain is often fooled. Magicians rely on that fact. So do con-artists and corrupt politicians and lying preachers and 9-11 perps and their devoted defenders.
The decoy aircraft flying directly towards Sean Boger in the helipad control tower and banking right above the light poles and overhead highway sign was at one place and the explosion at the Pentagon 1st floor at another.
The actual verified eyewitnesses saw an aircraft flying above the light poles and overhead highway sign on the north flight path and banking to the right and not an aircraft nor helicopter flying inches above the lawn on the official southern flight path at 535 mph.
Are there any explosives capable of producing the damage in, out, and around the pentagon in one large explosion?
I'm not an expert but there are Rapid Wall Beaching Kits.
Now I want you to list where these people were located, and the view they had of the light poles being struck.
As for personal incredulity, as I say there is no evidence that a pole ever came into contact with that cab. A pole dangling out of the front of the window would have helped.
No one saw the plane on the SoC path, no one saw the plane hitting poles. They saw poles lying on the ground, saw photos, or read news reports after the fact and then it turns into, "the plane hit some light poles on its way in" which turns into the pseudoskeptic saying "these witnesses saw the plane hitting light poles".
Walker Lee Evey
LEE EVEY WAS AT HOME DURING THE ATTACK. HE IS NOT A WITNESS. HE WAS THE PEN REN MGR.
Is it really possible for the plane to "try to recover" at over 500mph? If any of the 5 poles really affected the flight of the plane that would have been devastating and there is no way it would have hit with such perfect precision so low and level and fast to the ground as depicted in the security video.
http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/1308922/3/