• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Is anybody surprised?

A

Anonymous

Guest
The way all the dems slobber all over her, it should come as no surprise that hitlery has some questionable ethics. :lol2:

Excerpts, link below. My emphasis. :lol:



"WASHINGTON, Nov. 20 — She had only token opposition, but Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton still spent more on her re-election — upward of $30 million — than any other candidate for Senate this year. So where did all the money go?

"It helped Mrs. Clinton win a margin of victory of more than 30 points. It helped her build a new set of campaign contributors. And it allowed her to begin assembling the nuts and bolts needed to run a presidential campaign.

"But that was not all. Mrs. Clinton also bought more than $13,000 worth of flowers, mostly for fund-raising events and as thank-yous for donors. She laid out $27,000 for valet parking, paid as much as $800 in a single month in credit card interest and — above all — paid tens of thousands of dollars a month to an assortment of consultants and aides.

"Mark Penn, Mrs. Clinton’s pollster and longtime adviser, received at least $1.1 million. Mandy Grunwald, her longtime communications strategist, received more than $930,000. Hudson Media Partners, an offshoot of the Glover Park Group consulting firm where two prominent Clinton advisers, Howard Wolfson and Gigi Georges, work, received nearly $200,000.

"Campaign aides said much of the consulting work went toward building a donor list that would be vital in a presidential race. But they did not specify the work done by each of the consultants or say exactly how much of the money they received went to preparing for a presidential run rather than Mrs. Clinton’s Senate re-election. And the figures have raised eyebrows among the people who raise money for her."




(I split the link up so that it wouldn't run off the page. If you want to see the entire article, you'll have to copy and paste it.)

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/21/us/politics/21donate.html?ei=5065&en=
ec8012d7bc870ecb&ex=1164776400&partner=MYWAY&pagewanted=print
 

Econ101

Well-known member
I hope Hillary gets sidelined fast. She will be no good for the nation.

Tyson Foods' chief counsel Blair was on the other side of her infamous commodity trades that netted her over a hundred thousand. She sold out her ethics then, something to be watched for in any person being given power.

Since commodity trades were not time stamped at that time, they could not pin a charge on her but the evidence is there. If Hillary will whore out her ethics in the Tyson commodity deals for money, what else will she do?

She is definitely not a friend of cattle ranchers/farmers or integrity.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
:shock: :shock: :shock:

Econ101, I think I actually agreed with you about something... :lol:
 
Top