• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Is it acceptable for Iran to have a Nuke?

Is it acceptable for Iran to have a Nuke?

  • Yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

Steve

Well-known member
Quote:
France's President said we now have two alternatives, "Iran with a bomb, or bomb Iran".


Gee I never thought I would agree with a frenchman,...(but then again I have in the past agreed with Kolanuraven)

I think now is the time for all free nations to make a decision,

Deal with Iran now...or prepare for the end results...

Maybe its time for a new poll.

Is it acceptable for Iran to have a Nuke?

Yes.

No.

If No, how should we deal with it?
 

MoGal

Well-known member
Is it acceptable for the US to have nukes?
Are you saying USA is the only one who should have nukes (given we've got a sociopath president and war happy Cheney who makes billions from war)?

Are we going to "nuke" everybody who doesn't see eye to eye with the US? or who doesn't willingly give up their resources (water, oil, minerals, etc....)

Here we are with enough oil in Alaska to keep the USA for the next 200 years and oil pirates want to bilk the Americans for millions.

There are many countries with the capability to "nuke" don't you think we should proceed with caution??
 

Steve

Well-known member
MoGal
Is it acceptable for the US to have nukes?

No we shouldn't have Nukes...

in fact in a "perfect world" their should be no need for any weapons..

but this is not a perfect world... so in the short term it would be advisable to keep them out of the hands of those who would use them.




MoGal
(given we've got a sociopath president and war happy Cheney who makes billions from war)?

so·ci·o·path (sō'sē-ə-păth', -shē-) pronunciation
One who is affected with a personality disorder marked by antisocial behavior.

Just your biased opinion.. but He seems to get along fine in social settings...

I think your Crazy and more dangerous then Bush, but then again I've only read what you and the conspiracy theorists in your head have said..

MoGal
Are we going to "nuke" everybody who doesn't see eye to eye with the US?

No. I said "I think we should obliterate Iran's Navy, Air Force, Army, and Mosques...",..we can do that without Nukes...

as for the rest of you comments...It's not about oil...it's about a Extremist Radical Islamic wacko country getting a Nuke,
 

Steve

Well-known member
MoGal
Here we are with enough oil in Alaska to keep the USA for the next 200 years

and Bush has often pushed for access to that oil..

He made access to it a major part of his energy policy...

you can't have it both ways... Blaming Bush for Not drilling in Alaska is like saying Gore personally melted the Antarctic with a blow dryer to prove global warming exists...

If you google "Bush Alaska oil",.. you get 2,130,000 responses.

I would be willing to bet that in an overwhelming majority of them the general theme is:

"Bush is advocating tapping the oil supply in Alaska"

But feel free to read them all and prove me wrong...
 

outrigger

Well-known member
correct me if i am wrong, the environmentatlist are the ones holding use back from drilling in ANWR right? didn't Carter buy this land for drilling of oil?
 
Top