• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Is this a joke?

leanin' H

Well-known member
Amazing to see how much "change" is actually really just the same but with a different definition? Must come out of a liberal dictionary where ya learn the new meaning to words like "bitter", "clinging to religion", "whitefolks greed", "95% Americans get tax cuts"!
 

Steve

Well-known member
MSNBC's Matthews gives insight on the next step for President-elect Obama: transition. According to his sources, the new Obama administration will be formed using "three watchwords":

-- Bipartisan

-- Diversity. Matthews: "A truly diverse government is going to be formed."

-- Youth. Matthews: "No retreads -- they're not going to bring back people from old administrations."

Obama sure fooled the liberals,.. bet Matthews is haveing trouble eating crow.. on that one,.. :roll:
 

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
Larrry said:
The I TOLD YOU SO'S are sure starting early. That phrase is gonna be used so much in the next four years.

And he aint even president yet. More of that PC junk? Queer is now called Gay. EEO is now called diversity. The list goes on and on.

So now "change" will have a whole new definition for the dictionary. The "quick oil change" businesses will have to come up with a new name like "quick oil replacement."
 

CattleArmy

Well-known member
It should have always been gay or homosexual the other word is not nice.

Some here could be referred to as queer. They wouldn't like it one bit.
 

Texan

Well-known member
I thought you libs told us not to worry about Obama and gun control? Are any of you aware of the gun control efforts that Eric Holder was responsible for in the Reno Justice Department? Do any of you care that Eric Holder supported the DC handgun ban and wants a national handgun registry? And Obama said he supports the Second Amendment? :x
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
How many of the liberal arguements for Obama are already toast? Let's make a list;
1) He supports gun rights
2) No lobbyists in his government
3) He supports the Constitution
3) He is going to change Washington
 

Texan

Well-known member
Sandhusker said:
How many of the liberal arguements for Obama are already toast? Let's make a list;
1) He supports gun rights
2) No lobbyists in his government
3) He supports the Constitution
3) He is going to change Washington
People who fell for his crap should be furious at being conned, Sandhusker. He hasn't even made it to inauguration day yet and I can think of a few people around here that should be ashamed to show up.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
Texan said:
Sandhusker said:
How many of the liberal arguements for Obama are already toast? Let's make a list;
1) He supports gun rights
2) No lobbyists in his government
3) He supports the Constitution
3) He is going to change Washington
People who fell for his crap should be furious at being conned, Sandhusker. He hasn't even made it to inauguration day yet and I can think of a few people around here that should be ashamed to show up.

They're not smart enough to know they've been conned, Texan. They're drunk on the kool-aid. Heck, they're even DEFENDING the con!
 

Texan

Well-known member
Don't you Obamaniacs care about ethics in your guy's cabinet picks? What about the Marc Rich pardon? Don't you care that Eric Holder was at best incompetent in that deal? And much more likely than incompetent, he had a desire to be paid off - don't you guys care?

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-holder20-2008nov20,0,532485.story

Aren't 'little' things like competence and integrity in an Attorney General important to you libs?
 

Texan

Well-known member
Much has been made, and appropriately so, of Holder’s untoward performance in the final corrupt act of the Clinton administration: the pardons issued in the departing president’s final hours. Of these, most notorious is the case of Marc Rich, an unrepentant fugitive wanted on extensive fraud, racketeering, and trading-with-the-enemy charges — but granted a pardon nonetheless thanks to the intercession of his ex-wife, a generous donor to Clinton’s library and legal-defense fund.

Holder’s role was aptly described as “unconscionable” by a congressional committee. He steered Rich’s allies to retain the influential former White House counsel Jack Quinn (Holder later conceded he hoped Quinn would help him become attorney general in a Gore administration); he helped Quinn directly lobby Clinton, doing an end-run around the standard pardon process (including DOJ’s pardon attorney); and he kept the deliberations hidden from the district U.S. attorney and investigative agencies prosecuting Rich so they couldn’t learn about the pardon application and register their objections.

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YmM1OGM4OGRiNTI5NTIzOTFkMDAwMTJiNGFlYWFiZGI=
 

Texan

Well-known member
Texan said:
Aren't 'little' things like competence and integrity in an Attorney General important to you libs?
Well, it's been three years, Oldtimer. So, what do you think?
 

Steve

Well-known member
Sandhusker said:
How many of the liberal arguements for Obama are already toast? Let's make a list;
1) He supports gun rights
2) No lobbyists in his government
3) He supports the Constitution
3) He is going to change Washington

5. most transparent administration in the history of DC. :roll:
6. unemployment will not go over 8% :shock: :roll:
("would boost the economy and keep the unemployment rate below 8%".)
7. Close the Guantanamo Bay Detention Center
8.Allow five days of public comment before signing bills
9. Reduce earmarks to 1994 levels or pledge to veto legislation containing earmarks,.. (Obama doubled them instead!!!) :shock: :roll:

I think a book could be written just on the earmark promises broken.. and a full 21 volume set on the lack of transparency...
:roll: :shock: :roll:
 
Top