• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

It aint good for hillary

Red Robin

Well-known member
Democrats Boo Hillary

Saturday, January 5, 2008 11:22 AM

By: Newsmax Staff Article Font Size

As if coming in a shocking third in the Iowa caucuses weren't humiliating enough, Hillary Clinton had to endure being booed by fellow Democrats, not once but twice.

Appearing at the New Hampshire Democratic Party 100 Club dinner Thursday night, Mrs. Clinton was twice greeted by a chorus of boos from some of the 3000 guests at the affair, the largest political dinner in New Hampshire history, according to Time Magazine's Swampland blog.

Noting that when rival Barack Obama rose to speak "the crowd surged forward chanting 'O-bam-a' and 'Fired Up, Ready to Go!' " Time wrote that by comparison Hillary was twice booed -- the first time when she said she has always and will continue to work for "change for you." The audience, particularly from Obama supporters who were waving Obama signs, let out a noise that sounded like a thousand peole collectively groaning.

The second round of boos came when she said: "There are two big questions for voters in New Hampshire. One is: who will be ready to lead from day one? The second, who can we nominate who will go the distance against the Republicans?”

During that second round, Time reported, Mrs. Clinton was forced to pause as boos from the crowd mixed with cheers from her own supporters.

The Swampland concluded that if the dinner "is any bell weather – Barack Obama will handily win here."

© 2008 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Latest Poll: Hillary Trails by Ten in NH

Saturday, January 5, 2008 3:11 PM

By: Newsmax Staff Article Font Size

The latest Rasmussen Poll indicates that Hillary Clinton has dropped well behind in New Hampshire after her third-place finish in Iowa. Meanwhile, John McCain now has a five-point lead over fellow Republican Mitt Romney.

In a telephone survey of 510 likely Democratic voters on Friday, Rasmussen found 37 percent backing Barack Obama, 27 percent for Clinton, 19 percent for John Edwards and 8 percent for Bill Richardson.

In Rasmussen's last New Hampshire polling, before Christmas, Clinton led Obama by 3 percent. Romney had a narrow lead over McCain.

Rasmussen now projects that 40 percent of the Democratic ballots and 32 percent of GOP ballots will be cast by independents, not registered party members.

This week's survey shows McCain with 31 percent, Romney at 26, Ron Paul rising to third place with 14, Iowa winner Mike Huckabee at 11, Rudy Giuliani 8, Fred Thompson 5, others 2. Three percent are undecided.

The poll's margin of error is 4.5 percent.

© 2008 Newsmax. All rights reserved.
 

Red Robin

Well-known member
True but at the moment she looks panic stricken and he looks presidential. Maybe she could still be dennis the menis' running mate.
 

Tex

Well-known member
When Hillary started using the "Fired up", "Ready to go" from O'bama's campaign, she showed how she will say or use anything, even if it is not authenic to her, to get elected.

She sounds desperate to me.
 

Texan

Well-known member
kolanuraven said:
Don't get all excited and wet yer pants just yet.


There's still 49 states and Puerto Rico yet to go!!!
Looks to me like the writing is on the wall. Osama Obama is gaining momentum. You Dems ought to really be proud of him. Two whole years in the US Senate - what an accomplishment.

I'd like to hear the private conversations between old Bill and Hill. I bet that bitch is furious - probably shittin' on one hock and kickin' it off with the other one. :lol:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Texan said:
kolanuraven said:
Don't get all excited and wet yer pants just yet.


There's still 49 states and Puerto Rico yet to go!!!
Looks to me like the writing is on the wall. Osama Obama is gaining momentum. You Dems ought to really be proud of him. Two whole years in the US Senate - what an accomplishment.

Look who went and arrogantly forgot who he represents--told the little folk of the country that they don't matter as long as his elitist buddies are happy and profiteering from their globalist ventures- and has driven the entire country to where they are asking for a massive change and are getting all the uncommitted and independents along with even some of those that were Republican to vote for a black Osama....

Yep-- Even the staunch Repubs at the coffee shop had to chuckle a little when it was brought up that GW's legacy will be that he got the first black man elected President when all thought it was impossible... :wink: :lol: :lol:

But they pretty well agreed Obama or whoever can't do any worse that GW has for 7 years :roll: :( :mad:

These neocons like GW's buddies forget-- when you promote the Walmarting of America- and the further division of the classes in America and the withering away of the middle class-- you also promote the Democratic party--by taking many more small business owners and good paying manufacturing jobs out of the local community- and putting many more into lower paying service jobs- which historically have been and will continue to be Democrat predominated...
You add in GW's refusal to police the border- which creates a new "near-slave illegal immigrant" class- and you end up with getting the Dems millions of new votes- and a good chance minorities will control America from now on....

Yep- Texan-- your guys hero GW has done things up just fine for the America we used to have...SOLD IT DOWN THE DRAIN..... :( :( :mad:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
passin thru said:
I see someone found the GW detour......................

I just didn't want to see you guys giving all the credit for Obama and the upcoming Democrats reign of power to the Democrats or Liberals.... :wink:

GW played a huge role :( :( :(
 

jodywy

Well-known member
Took 4 years of Jimmy Carter to get us Ronald Regan, maybe 4 years of Obama might be what it takes to find another Regan.
Banker has a bummer sticker said Carter made me a Republican, GW changed me back.
 

passin thru

Well-known member
As much as one can give GW heck, I always lok at the bright side. If ole SKerry would have been elected we would have had TWO more Ruth Bader Ginsburgs on the SC...............now that is way past SCARRRYYY.

Now Hill I don't want her to self destruct yet, wait till she gets the nomination.................she will self destruct...........the question is when?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
jodywy said:
Took 4 years of Jimmy Carter to get us Ronald Regan, maybe 4 years of Obama might be what it takes to find another Regan.
Banker has a bummer sticker said Carter made me a Republican, GW changed me back.

Yep-- and I'd love to find one of those bumper stickers...Could sure get some guffaws and stir things up down at the Water Hole and Coffee Shop......

The polls today are all saying that Obama is leading in New Hampshire- another state with few black/minority voters...Rasmussen even puts him 10 points ahead of Hillary.....If he picks up a win in NH too- he will get many of the minority/black voters that before didn't think a black was electable....And if he and Edwards go together- there isn't a Republican candidate now that can stop them.....

I watched Edwards being interviewed on some of the morning news programs-- and I think you will end up seeing a Obama/Edwards Democrat ticket-- which may be unbeatable....

Edwards wouldn't come right out and admit they had an agreed upon "alliance"- but did say they were running with the same goals- change from the status quo and to get Hitlery out of the picture....

Even some of the other "talking heads" say they think they could actually be seeing the death of the "Clinton Machine" -- as just as everyone says they are fed up with the "Bush family"- so are they of the old fogies that Hillary has surrounded herself with....
 

Red Robin

Well-known member
Oldtimer you are continually hijacking the threads and beating a dead horse.What does GW's failure have to do with obama over hillary? Join the conversation. We talk about other things here than GW.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Red Robin said:
Oldtimer you are continually hijacking the threads and beating a dead horse.What does GW's failure have to do with obama over hillary? Join the conversation. We talk about other things here than GW.

Only a few folk left even in Arkansas can't see the handwriting on the wall :roll: Dad used to say it took a big club to educate an Arkasas mule :wink: :lol:
GW's administration has crippled/wrecked the country- and he has continually arrogantly refused to follow the wishes of the public-- which has pretty well neutered the Republican Party-- and it sounds like the majority of the folks in the US no longer trust the Republican Party-- so they want major change (the reason they are not following the establishment annointed Repubs) and many are now going towards the Democrats...The figures I saw today was that 40% of NH is Independent- and about 2/3's of them are predicted to go Democrat...
They also don't see Hillary as any change because she's part of the old status quo establishment that they are trying to get rid of...Maybe the reason the Presidents and Congress's favorable ratings are both below 30%......

Like I said before- GW and the neocons actively promoted the Walmarting of America, which Bill Clinton started- and the further division of the classes in America and the withering away of the middle class... While Corporate profits may have increased- and a small amount of rich got richer--- the large class of working peoples wages have been stagnant over the last 7 years, which has taken many wageearners out of the middle class...By making more lower class people you also promote the Democratic party--by taking many more small business owners and good paying manufacturing jobs out of the local community- and putting many more into lower paying service jobs- which historically have been and will continue to be Democrat predominated...
You add in GW's refusal to police the border- which creates a new "near-slave illegal immigrant" class- and you end up with getting the Dems millions of new votes- and a good chance minorities may control America from now on....

GW has created that backlash and cry for major change in the country- and Obama is seen as that where Hillary or none of the Repubs are....
 

Red Robin

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
GW has created that backlash and cry for major change in the country- and Obama is seen as that where Hillary or none of the Repubs are....
:lol2: really...so if hillary or a republican wins, that would be a vote of confidence for Bush but if Obama wins then it's because Bush was bad... So you're voting for Obama then?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Red Robin said:
Oldtimer said:
GW has created that backlash and cry for major change in the country- and Obama is seen as that where Hillary or none of the Repubs are....
:lol2: really...so if hillary or a republican wins, that would be a vote of confidence for Bush but if Obama wins then it's because Bush was bad... So you're voting for Obama then?

Nope-- I'm just telling you why Obama is beating Hillary in the early primaries....Probably the reason the anti-establishment Huckleberry and non traditional McCain are doing so well over the establishment/corporate annointeds Rumney and Gagliano....
Folks are running as fast as they can away from anything establishment or status quo-- and they don't care who they elect just to get rid of GW's reign....

RR--You gonna vote for McCain if he's the Repub candidate :???: ...Before you answer remember he's committed a couple of Republican sins--he let a former Democrat (Lieberman) put his arm on his shoulder- and he actually talked to Teddy :wink: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 

Red Robin

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Red Robin said:
Oldtimer said:
GW has created that backlash and cry for major change in the country- and Obama is seen as that where Hillary or none of the Repubs are....
:lol2: really...so if hillary or a republican wins, that would be a vote of confidence for Bush but if Obama wins then it's because Bush was bad... So you're voting for Obama then?

Nope-- I'm just telling you why Obama is beating Hillary in the early primaries....Probably the reason the anti-establishment Huckleberry and non traditional McCain are doing so well over the establishment/corporate annointeds Rumney and Gagliano....
Folks are running as fast as they can away from anything establishment or status quo-- and they don't care who they elect just to get rid of GW's reign....

RR--You gonna vote for McCain if he's the Repub candidate :???: ...Before you answer remember he's committed a couple of Republican sins--he let a former Democrat (Lieberman) put his arm on his shoulder- and he actually talked to Teddy :wink: :lol: :lol: :lol:
You're wrong again oldwhiner. The reason hillary is getting beat is because she lacks charisma. A couple months ago you were pounding your fist saying it's the border stupid...now you say it's change that's driving votes. A year ago you were saying they were electing dems (like pelosi :lol: ) because they were more conservative. You just keep spouting off what you read on Libertarian blogs Ot and you're bound to be right sometime. Huckabee also has charisma and can beat hillary.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
I suppose now you ain't gonna buy me one of those neat bumper stickers :???: If I find where to get them do you want me to get one for you anyway ? :wink: :lol:

Carter made me a Republican, GW changed me back.
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Red Robin said:
Oldtimer you are continually hijacking the threads and beating a dead horse.What does GW's failure have to do with obama over hillary? Join the conversation. We talk about other things here than GW.

Only a few folk left even in Arkansas can't see the handwriting on the wall :roll: .




Uhhhh......mmmmm......... you're assuming they can read it???? :lol: :lol: :wink: :wink: :wink:
 
Top