A
Anonymous
Guest
Mike: "How were animals that were under 30 months that tested positive found to be "POSITIVE" if the tests won't reveal? Some were 24 months or under.
"Would Not" gives no wiggle room. Your statement is a blatant lie!"
Your examples doesn't prove a damn thing Mike.
These animals "SUPPOSEDLY" less than 24 months of age WERE NOT CONFIRMED with the same tests that confirmed that some of our false positives were actually negatives. They could have easily been false positives as well. USDA STATED THAT THESE CASES WERE NOT CONFIRMED with the same testing methodology that we use BUT HEY, MIKE KNOWS MORE THAN USDA DOES.
If my statement was a "BLATANT LIE" as you claim, WHY THE HELL DID CREEKSTONE'S FIELDING ADMIT THAT "BSE TESTED DOES NOT MEAN BSE FREE"??? WHERE IS THE CONFIRMED BSE POSITIVES IN THE US AND CANADA THAT ARE UNDER 24 MONTHS OF AGE????
Hmmm???? Well, ah...geee....ah....
A 23 Month Holstein that could be a "false positive" is a hell of a long ways from a 12 - 14 month old beef animal testing positive.
You "illusionists" make me sick.
IF JAPAN WAS DEMANDING BSE TESTED BEEF, THEY WOULD NOT HAVE ACCEPTED NON BSE TESTED BEEF.
Creating an "ILLUSION" is as bad as lying. Both are deceptive and you certainly fit that same mold Mike.
As if you, Mike, know more about BSE testing than the agency taxed with that responsibility. Your arrogance knows no bounds.
~SH~