• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Journal editorial, 4-23: A visit with Tim Johnson

Tommy

Well-known member
Journal editorial, 4-23: A visit with Tim Johnson

By The Journal Editorial Board

Sen. Tim Johnson stopped by last week to visit with the Journal editorial board, as he and other members of South Dakota's congressional delegation do from time to time. Because yet another Canadian cow had been diagnosed with mad cow disease the week before, we asked the sponsor of country of origin labeling (COOL) legislation about the issue and the Bush administration's plans to open the Canadian border to cows older than 30 months.

"I'm not happy about opening the border to younger cattle," Johnson said. "It's playing with fire to allow older cattle into the country." He added that the Bush administration should "back off" on loosening cattle trade restrictions with Canada.

Johnson said he was frustrated that Congress has delayed implementation of country of origin labeling of meat and poultry products until 2008. The law was originally passed in 2002 and the House has twice delayed its implementation.

What really irked the senator was how the latest delay was pushed through Congress. Johnson was on last year's conference committee negotiating differences between the House and Senate versions of the agriculture spending bill, and the chairmen from the House and Senate agreed to accept the House version of the bill with the COOL delay but did not schedule a committee vote on the final version. The conference report could not be amended and Congress accepted the COOL delay as part of the ag spending bill.

Johnson called the conference committee's action a "corrupted process." "What I don't like is when the process is being done behind closed doors and in the dark of night," he said.

Johnson said every other country labels its own agriculture products, and the European Union has country of origin labeling on meat sold in Europe. He said it is a food safety issue that everyone else gets except the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Because foreign markets have concerns about meat products from the United States, U.S. beef producers have lost export markets. Meanwhile, foreign beef continues to enter the U.S. and is put on the shelves alongside American-produced beef. "Producers get the worst of both worlds," he said.

Sen. Johnson is trying to get COOL implemented immediately and also has a bill that would prohibit the USDA from stamping imported beef and lamb products as "USDA prime" or "USDA choice" and to classify graded imported meat as "misbranded."

Johnson's bill is a good solution if COOL is going to be blocked. How would the USDA know if imported meat products are safe? It makes sense to stop the USDA from putting its logo on meat that it can't verify as safe to eat.

We share Sen. Johnson's frustration with getting COOL legislation implemented. Other countries support their domestic agriculture producers, but not the United States. Even though U.S. beef producers meet USDA regulations that ensure a safe food supply, American consumers aren't told which meat products are produced domestically under strict safety rules and which products come from who knows where. It doesn't make any sense to us.

Good luck, Sen. Johnson, in getting implementation of country of origin labeling through Congress. You're going to need it.
 

Econ101

Well-known member
Tommy said:
Journal editorial, 4-23: A visit with Tim Johnson

By The Journal Editorial Board

Sen. Tim Johnson stopped by last week to visit with the Journal editorial board, as he and other members of South Dakota's congressional delegation do from time to time. Because yet another Canadian cow had been diagnosed with mad cow disease the week before, we asked the sponsor of country of origin labeling (COOL) legislation about the issue and the Bush administration's plans to open the Canadian border to cows older than 30 months.

"I'm not happy about opening the border to younger cattle," Johnson said. "It's playing with fire to allow older cattle into the country." He added that the Bush administration should "back off" on loosening cattle trade restrictions with Canada.

Johnson said he was frustrated that Congress has delayed implementation of country of origin labeling of meat and poultry products until 2008. The law was originally passed in 2002 and the House has twice delayed its implementation.

What really irked the senator was how the latest delay was pushed through Congress. Johnson was on last year's conference committee negotiating differences between the House and Senate versions of the agriculture spending bill, and the chairmen from the House and Senate agreed to accept the House version of the bill with the COOL delay but did not schedule a committee vote on the final version. The conference report could not be amended and Congress accepted the COOL delay as part of the ag spending bill.

Johnson called the conference committee's action a "corrupted process." "What I don't like is when the process is being done behind closed doors and in the dark of night," he said.

Johnson said every other country labels its own agriculture products, and the European Union has country of origin labeling on meat sold in Europe. He said it is a food safety issue that everyone else gets except the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Because foreign markets have concerns about meat products from the United States, U.S. beef producers have lost export markets. Meanwhile, foreign beef continues to enter the U.S. and is put on the shelves alongside American-produced beef. "Producers get the worst of both worlds," he said.

Sen. Johnson is trying to get COOL implemented immediately and also has a bill that would prohibit the USDA from stamping imported beef and lamb products as "USDA prime" or "USDA choice" and to classify graded imported meat as "misbranded."

Johnson's bill is a good solution if COOL is going to be blocked. How would the USDA know if imported meat products are safe? It makes sense to stop the USDA from putting its logo on meat that it can't verify as safe to eat.

We share Sen. Johnson's frustration with getting COOL legislation implemented. Other countries support their domestic agriculture producers, but not the United States. Even though U.S. beef producers meet USDA regulations that ensure a safe food supply, American consumers aren't told which meat products are produced domestically under strict safety rules and which products come from who knows where. It doesn't make any sense to us.

Good luck, Sen. Johnson, in getting implementation of country of origin labeling through Congress. You're going to need it.

Seems like all you have to do is pay off the party leadership to get what you want---behind closed doors.

I'm mad too, Senator Johnson.
 

mrj

Well-known member
Tommy said:
Journal editorial, 4-23: A visit with Tim Johnson

By The Journal Editorial Board

Sen. Tim Johnson stopped by last week to visit with the Journal editorial board, as he and other members of South Dakota's congressional delegation do from time to time. Because yet another Canadian cow had been diagnosed with mad cow disease the week before, we asked the sponsor of country of origin labeling (COOL) legislation about the issue and the Bush administration's plans to open the Canadian border to cows older than 30 months.

"I'm not happy about opening the border to younger cattle," Johnson said. "It's playing with fire to allow older cattle into the country." He added that the Bush administration should "back off" on loosening cattle trade restrictions with Canada.

Johnson said he was frustrated that Congress has delayed implementation of country of origin labeling of meat and poultry products until 2008. The law was originally passed in 2002 and the House has twice delayed its implementation.

What really irked the senator was how the latest delay was pushed through Congress. Johnson was on last year's conference committee negotiating differences between the House and Senate versions of the agriculture spending bill, and the chairmen from the House and Senate agreed to accept the House version of the bill with the COOL delay but did not schedule a committee vote on the final version. The conference report could not be amended and Congress accepted the COOL delay as part of the ag spending bill.

Johnson called the conference committee's action a "corrupted process." "What I don't like is when the process is being done behind closed doors and in the dark of night," he said.

Johnson said every other country labels its own agriculture products, and the European Union has country of origin labeling on meat sold in Europe. He said it is a food safety issue that everyone else gets except the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Because foreign markets have concerns about meat products from the United States, U.S. beef producers have lost export markets. Meanwhile, foreign beef continues to enter the U.S. and is put on the shelves alongside American-produced beef. "Producers get the worst of both worlds," he said.

Sen. Johnson is trying to get COOL implemented immediately and also has a bill that would prohibit the USDA from stamping imported beef and lamb products as "USDA prime" or "USDA choice" and to classify graded imported meat as "misbranded."

Johnson's bill is a good solution if COOL is going to be blocked. How would the USDA know if imported meat products are safe? It makes sense to stop the USDA from putting its logo on meat that it can't verify as safe to eat.

We share Sen. Johnson's frustration with getting COOL legislation implemented. Other countries support their domestic agriculture producers, but not the United States. Even though U.S. beef producers meet USDA regulations that ensure a safe food supply, American consumers aren't told which meat products are produced domestically under strict safety rules and which products come from who knows where. It doesn't make any sense to us.

Good luck, Sen. Johnson, in getting implementation of country of origin labeling through Congress. You're going to need it.


Ignoring the fact that Sen. Johnsons' Democrat party has done just as much "behind closed doors/in the dark of night" business as Republicans ever have......what does the quality/grade stamp have to do with "strict safety rules"? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! if one wants to be honest about it.

MRJ
 

Econ101

Well-known member
MRJ said:
Tommy said:
Journal editorial, 4-23: A visit with Tim Johnson

By The Journal Editorial Board

Sen. Tim Johnson stopped by last week to visit with the Journal editorial board, as he and other members of South Dakota's congressional delegation do from time to time. Because yet another Canadian cow had been diagnosed with mad cow disease the week before, we asked the sponsor of country of origin labeling (COOL) legislation about the issue and the Bush administration's plans to open the Canadian border to cows older than 30 months.

"I'm not happy about opening the border to younger cattle," Johnson said. "It's playing with fire to allow older cattle into the country." He added that the Bush administration should "back off" on loosening cattle trade restrictions with Canada.

Johnson said he was frustrated that Congress has delayed implementation of country of origin labeling of meat and poultry products until 2008. The law was originally passed in 2002 and the House has twice delayed its implementation.

What really irked the senator was how the latest delay was pushed through Congress. Johnson was on last year's conference committee negotiating differences between the House and Senate versions of the agriculture spending bill, and the chairmen from the House and Senate agreed to accept the House version of the bill with the COOL delay but did not schedule a committee vote on the final version. The conference report could not be amended and Congress accepted the COOL delay as part of the ag spending bill.

Johnson called the conference committee's action a "corrupted process." "What I don't like is when the process is being done behind closed doors and in the dark of night," he said.

Johnson said every other country labels its own agriculture products, and the European Union has country of origin labeling on meat sold in Europe. He said it is a food safety issue that everyone else gets except the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Because foreign markets have concerns about meat products from the United States, U.S. beef producers have lost export markets. Meanwhile, foreign beef continues to enter the U.S. and is put on the shelves alongside American-produced beef. "Producers get the worst of both worlds," he said.

Sen. Johnson is trying to get COOL implemented immediately and also has a bill that would prohibit the USDA from stamping imported beef and lamb products as "USDA prime" or "USDA choice" and to classify graded imported meat as "misbranded."

Johnson's bill is a good solution if COOL is going to be blocked. How would the USDA know if imported meat products are safe? It makes sense to stop the USDA from putting its logo on meat that it can't verify as safe to eat.

We share Sen. Johnson's frustration with getting COOL legislation implemented. Other countries support their domestic agriculture producers, but not the United States. Even though U.S. beef producers meet USDA regulations that ensure a safe food supply, American consumers aren't told which meat products are produced domestically under strict safety rules and which products come from who knows where. It doesn't make any sense to us.

Good luck, Sen. Johnson, in getting implementation of country of origin labeling through Congress. You're going to need it.


Ignoring the fact that Sen. Johnsons' Democrat party has done just as much "behind closed doors/in the dark of night" business as Republicans ever have......what does the quality/grade stamp have to do with "strict safety rules"? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! if one wants to be honest about it.

MRJ

So only SH's illusions are acceptable to you, MRJ?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Sen. Johnson is trying to get COOL implemented immediately and also has a bill that would prohibit the USDA from stamping imported beef and lamb products as "USDA prime" or "USDA choice" and to classify graded imported meat as "misbranded."

How ironic that Johnson is using Canada's bse cases as a driver for "M"COOL when "M"COOL specifically prohibited "M"ID because "M"COOL proponents didn't want to be burdened with traceback. Oh the irony!

Grading imported meat as "MISBRANDED"??

What the hell is that supposed to mean?

I'll bet that will really fly. You go liberal Tim Johnson, you tell them packer blamers what they want to hear. Yippee!


~SH~
 

Econ101

Well-known member
~SH~ said:
Sen. Johnson is trying to get COOL implemented immediately and also has a bill that would prohibit the USDA from stamping imported beef and lamb products as "USDA prime" or "USDA choice" and to classify graded imported meat as "misbranded."

How ironic that Johnson is using Canada's bse cases as a driver for "M"COOL when "M"COOL specifically prohibited "M"ID because "M"COOL proponents didn't want to be burdened with traceback. Oh the irony!

Grading imported meat as "MISBRANDED"??

What the hell is that supposed to mean?

I'll bet that will really fly. You go liberal Tim Johnson, you tell them packer blamers what they want to hear. Yippee!


~SH~

If you think your views are so popular, why don't you run for Senator?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
My views aren't popular. Blaming is more popular than truth. At least I don't have to lie or support lies, like you.


~SH~
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
~SH~ said:
My views aren't popular. Blaming is more popular than truth. At least I don't have to lie or support lies, like you.


~SH~

Who are you kidding (other that MRJ)? Your views aren't based in reality.
 

Econ101

Well-known member
~SH~ said:
My views aren't popular. Blaming is more popular than truth. At least I don't have to lie or support lies, like you.


~SH~

Sounds like you are in opposite day with this post. Can't you warn us beforehand?
 
Top