hypocritexposer
Well-known member
Please make sure you not only mention the BC issue, but also the "Natural Born Citizen" issue and dual citizenship. Remind the Judge of the "legitimate doubt" precedent that the SCOTUS has expressed about a "dual citizen" being able to qualify as a Natural Born, and refer him to Obama's website. thank you
http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.3582/pub_detail.asp
http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate
June 25, 2009
Exclusive: Judge Accepting Letters in Lawsuit Re. Birth Certificate Question
Judge Joel Schneider is accepting letters in the Kerchner vs. Obama birth certificate case and will include them in the file if received by Monday, June 29th.
If you’re concerned about the Constitutional issues surrounding the birth certificate controversy, this is your chance to let your opinions be known. Security for families and for all Americans rests on the principles of law, and subversion of the Constitution is not in anyone’s best interests.
Send your letters to:
Hon. U.S. Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider
U.S. District Court
401 Market Street
Camden, NJ 08102-1568
FAX 856-757-5370
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.3582/pub_detail.asp
A judge hearing one of the cases challenging Barack Obama's eligibility to be president has taken the unusual step of describing the dispute as a serious constitutional issue and further has begun adding letters of comment from the public to the court record.
The case focuses on the alleged failure in Congress to follow the Constitution. That document, the lawsuit states, "provides that Congress must fully qualify the candidate 'elected' by the Electoral College Electors."
The Constitution provides, the lawsuit said, "If the president-elect shall have failed to qualify, then the vice president elect shall act as president until a president shall have qualified."
"There existed significant public doubt and grievances from plaintiffs and other concerned Americans regarding Obama's eligibility to be president and defendants had the sworn duty to protect and preserve the Constitution and specifically under the 20th Amendment, Section 3, a Constitutional obligation to confirm whether Obama, once the electors elected him, was qualified," the case explained.
"Congress is the elected representative of the American people and the people speak and act through them," the lawsuit said.
The defendants "violated" the 20th Amendment by failing to assure that Obama meets the eligibility requirements," the lawsuit said.
"Plaintiffs' complaint raises significant issues necessitating that the named defendants engage competent counsel to represent their interests. Given the high ranking positions of the defendants, the decision as to who will represent them in this case is not simple and straightforward," the judge said.
But as soon as attorneys are lined up, "the case will proceed expeditiously," he said.