• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Judge David O. Carter issued no ruling on the MTD

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Looks like we will need to wait a cuple more days for the ruling.

Judge David O. Carter issued no ruling on the Motion to Dismiss, nor to grant discovery. He cited his need to sort out the complex legal issues, consider all the arguments carefully.

One interesting question that Judge Carter asked was about Impeachment.

Judge Carter questioned the Defense’s counsel, regarding the method of impeachment and how that would address this controversy.

In all, Judge Carter was very concerned about standing claims and wanted to know what the actual injuries were, and how standing was being justified.

The Defense argued that the Court had no authority to hear the case, and that claims were political in nature and therefore not for the Judiciary to adjudicate.

Judge Carter pointed out that the case was unique and that there were no precedents to guide him thoroughly.
 

Lonecowboy

Well-known member
ORDER


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

CV-90 (12/02) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1

Case No. SACV09-0082 DOC (ANx) Date

October 5, 2009



Title CAPTAIN PAMELA BARNETT, ET AL.


V.


BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ET AL.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Present: The Honorable David O. Carter, U.S. District Judge

Kristee Hopkins Debbie Gale N/A

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:


Orly Taitz

Gary Kreep

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

David DeJute, AUSA

Roger West, AUSA

Proceedings: 1. MOTION BY DEFENDANTS TO DISMISS CASE

2. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Cause called and counsel state their appearances. Argument by counsel. Motion taken under submission.

On September 8, 2009, the Court previously set tentative case management dates.

The Court now orders those dates be made final.

Case Management dates are as follows:

Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing December 7, 2009, at 8:30 a.m.

File Motion for Summary Judgment November 16, 2009

Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment November 26, 2009

Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment November 30, 2009

Final Pretrial Conference January 11, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.

Jury Trial January 26, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.http://nationalwriterssyndicate.com/content/view/1473/2/
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
The date on what you posted is Oct 5, LC, so I'm not sure that is not just from the MTD case.

I have a funny feeling that this is Taitz putting the cart before the horse.

I still have not seen the decision on the motion to dismiss.
 

Lonecowboy

Well-known member
yea hypo, I've ben on the lookout and this is all I've found so far,
nothing about discovery or mtd.
I posted this for what it was worth. :D

gosh I'd love to be on that jury- not bad enough to move to CA though.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
hypocritexposer said:
The date on what you posted is Oct 5, LC, so I'm not sure that is not just from the MTD case.

I have a funny feeling that this is Taitz putting the cart before the horse.

I still have not seen the decision on the motion to dismiss.


Hypo there are about 32 pages that take a minute or two to load up at this site. Judge Carter told them to plan on the schedule he had set forth. I think what she is doing is just being prepared for any outcome.
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=7428

It is a pretty interesting read of what happened on the 5th.
 
Top