• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Jury Trial Begins April 3 in Cattle Producers’ Class Action

Help Support Ranchers.net:

Tommy

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
755
Reaction score
0
Location
South East Kansas
Jury Trial Begins April 3 in Cattle Producers’ Class Action Suit Against ‘Big 4’ Packers and Misreported Boxed Beef Prices



(Aberdeen, S.D.) – A federal jury trial will begin here April 3 to consider claims made against the four largest United States beef packers arising out of the misreporting of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s) boxed beef prices that occurred between April 2 and May 11, 2001.



The lawsuit was filed two and one-half years ago by three cattle producer-plaintiffs – Herman Schumacher, Michael Callicrate and Roger Koch – all of whom are proud members and staunch supporters of R-CALF USA. Each of these men sold cattle to the defendant-packing companies during the misreporting period. In June 2004, U.S. District Court Judge Charles Kornmann certified the case as a class action on behalf of all cattle producers who sold fed cattle on the cash market, or a basis affected by it, during the misreporting period to any of the four packer defendants: Tyson Fresh Meats Inc., formerly IBP Inc.; Cargill Meat Solutions, d/b/a Excel Corporation; Swift & Co., formerly known as ConAgra Beef Co.; and National Beef Packing Co., formerly known as Farmland National Beef Packing Co. The defendants control about 80 percent of the market for beef products in this country. The trial, expected to last two weeks, follows motions by the defendants to have the case dismissed, which Judge Kornmann denied in January.



The misreporting of boxed beef prices occurred at the start of mandatory reporting of boxed beef prices, which took effect April 2, 2001. Under the mandatory reporting law, the packers must report twice daily to USDA certain cattle-price information, including prices being received by the packers for boxed beef cuts. USDA duty was to then release the price information to the public so cattle producers and other market players have accurate, up-to-date information on cattle prices to inform their business operations. During the misreporting period, the prices the packers reported contained substantial errors that actually underreported the price the packers were receiving for boxed beef, which had the effect of depressing the prices cattle producers received for fed cattle sold to the packers during the same time period.

The reporting errors occurred in Choice and Select USDA boxed beef prices, with Choice prices underreported by between $1 per hundredweight (cwt) to more than $6 cwt during the period, and Select prices generally were underreported by about $1 cwt for most of the period. The lawsuit alleges the packer defendants violated the federal Packers and Stockyard Act (PSA), which prohibits unfair and deceptive practices by packers and stockyards. The suit claims that the packers’ conduct was unlawful because they knew from their internal records what prices they were receiving for boxed beef, while the sellers of fed cattle accepted lower prices for their cattle because of the inaccurately reported USDA boxed beef prices.



“These packing companies were trading on inside information to reap a windfall profit at the expense of cattle producers,” said plaintiff Mike Callicrate. “The packers knew both the real prices they were getting for their beef products, and the falsely lower prices being reported by USDA. Fed cattle sellers only had access to the false price information, and so were short-changed by the packers who had the true price information from their own records.”

Callicrate and the other plaintiffs intend to prove at trial that the four packer-defendants caused total damages to cattle-producer class members exceeding $40 million.

The April trial follows on the heels of a U.S. Government Accountability Office report released in December, which shows more than half of the government’s meatpacker audits revealed inaccuracies, omissions or undocumented transactions.

“That particular report raised serious questions in my mind as to whether the published price reports accurately represented true market conditions,” said Schumacher, another plaintiff. “Market conditions affect how much money producers receive for their cattle.”

Additionally, a January report released by USDA’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) concluded agency administrators had prevented employees from conducting investigations into complaints of anti-competitive activities and price manipulation by packers, and that USDA staff were falsely inflating the numbers of such investigations.
 

Econ101

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 26, 2005
Messages
7,060
Reaction score
0
Location
TX
"Fat cattle follow boxed beef prices in the U.S. and that is a fact"----SH.


It would be good if we had honest information on boxed beef prices instead of an assertion that twice daily reporting of boxed beef prices assumes accuracy of those numbers. Again, another fallacy of logic by SH.---Econ.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
18,486
Reaction score
0
Location
Nebraska
If it turns out that boxed beef prices were indeed underreported, that would make SH a "packer blamer" too! Won't we have fun with that! :lol:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Conman,

For you to question the relation between boxed beef prices and live cattle prices shows how completely ignorant you really are.



~SH~
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Are you saying that live cattle prices in Canada do not follow boxed beef prices?

Are you really that stupid?


~SH~
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
18,486
Reaction score
0
Location
Nebraska
~SH~ said:
Are you saying that live cattle prices in Canada do not follow boxed beef prices?

Are you really that stupid?


~SH~

Do the words "Salmon Run" bring back any memories? Did live cattle prices follow boxed beef prices then?
 

Latest posts

Top