T: "You stated that live cattle would have been coming in simultaniously with boxed beef if it had not been for R-CALF. Mar. 2005 is a long way from being simultanious with Sept.2003. Talk about trying to decieve. We all know that the injunction kept the border closed for four months, you are the one who is saying that R-CALF kept it closed longer."
When R-CULT takes credit for keeping the Canadian border closed to live cattle after USDA originally "PROPOSED" to opening it, are they lying?
You can't have it both ways Tommy! You can't support R-CULT in their argument that they kept the Canadian border closed since USDA originally announced their plans to open it and argue here that they only kept it closed for a short period of time. YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS.
Either R-CULT is lying to their members or you are lying now. You sort it out.
Conman: "Yes, SH, I probably said that. Now put it into context. Words or thoughts do not mean a whole lot as quotes unless they are quoted in context. Why do you stoop to such a low tactic in your arguing? Could it be you have no good arguments? I could lay out another scenario and say something else that holds only in that scenario. Will you take it out of context and argue again this same argument?"
Nobody is fooled by your illusionist defense of being "taken out of context". I asked you if you said it and you said "yes". Now you want to say it was taken out of context. Hahaha! Nobody's buying your deception anymore Conman. You have been exposed more times than Pamela Anderson.