• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Justice Roberts Agreed To Read Zer0 Documents

Mike

Well-known member
Yesterday I traveled to Idaho. I was able to address Chief Justice Roberts during the question answer session after his lecture. There were numerous cameras recording this event and simultaneous feed broadcast to all the campuses of the University of Idaho. Roughly 5,000 people in all the campuses had an opportunity to hear what I had to say, it is in video archives and now everybody knows the truth and knows that leftist media thugs such as Seattle Washington Observer shamelessly twist the truth to fit their Pro Obama blind idiot agenda.

It was a grueling day, I left home at 3 in the morning after sleeping only 3 hours and drove to San Diego, from there flew to Salt Lake City, from there to Tacoma, Washington, from there I drove for a couple of hours to be in Moscow Idaho, to address Chief Justice Roberts. After the lecture the audience was told, that they can ask questions, give their name and present a shot question. I was the first to run to the microphone and told Roberts. " My name is Orly Taitz, I am an attorney from Southern California. I left home at three o'clock in the morning and flew and drove thousands of miles to talk to you and ask you a question". Roberts seemed to be impressed by that and I continued. "Are you aware that there is criminal activity going on in the Supreme Court of the United States. I have submitted my case Lightfoot v Bowen to you. You agreed to hear it in the conference of all 9 Justices on January 23. Your clerk, Danny Bickle, on his own accord refused to forward to you an important supplemental brief, he has hidden it from you and refused to post it on the docket. Additionally, my case was erased from the docket, completely erased one day after the inauguration, only two days before it was supposed to be heard in the conference. Outraged citizens had to call and demand for it to be posted. On Monday I saw Justice Scalia and he had absolutely no knowledge of my case, that was supposedly heard in conference on January 23rd. It is inexplicable, particularly knowing that roughly half a million American citizens have written to him and to you Justice Roberts demanding that you hear this issue of eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro to be the President of the United States." At that point I have shown to Roberts a stack of papers, that I held. Those were my pleadings and printouts that I got from WorldNetDaily. It contained your names, names of about 350,000 that signed the petition. (there were others that have written individual letters,) . Roberts stated "I will read your documents, I will review them. Give them to my Secret Service Agent and I will review them". His Secret Service Agent approached me and stated " Give me all the documents, I promise you Justice Roberts will get them". I had a full suitcase of documents. The agent went to look for a box, he found a large box to fit all the documents, he showed me his badge, and introduced himself as Gilbert Shaw, secret Service Agent assigned fto the security of Chief Justice Roberts.
I gave him
1.Motion fo reconsideration of Lightfoot v Bowen with all the supplemental briefs.
2. Quo Warranto Easterling et al v Obama et al
3. 3300 pages of your names, people that signed WorldNetDaily petition, demanding that the Supreme Court hear Obama elligibility case.
4. Copy of a 164 page dossier and all the other documents sent to Eric Holder, Attorney General, describing suspected criminal activity, associated with Obama and his supporters. It described a whole campaign of cyber crimes, intimidation, harassment, defamation and assassination of character, impersonation of US army officer Scott Easterling and impersonation of me, it showed screen shots of information being erased from the docket of the Supreme Court, it contained information of court cases being created, fabricated in order to commit voter fraud and sway public opinion, it contained a list of a 100 addresses for Barack Obama with numerous different social security numbers, issued all over the country and attached to those addresses. It showed the address Obama used in Somerville Massachusetts, attached to the social security of a man who is 118 years old. It showed evidence of Obama committing perjury, lying under oath. It had his school registration from Indonesia under the name Barry Soetoro, citizen of Indonesia, religion Muslim. Right after this page there was a page of Obama's registration to become an attorney and officer of the court in Illinois, where he stated under oath that his name is Barack Hussein Obama and he had no other prior names. It contained a report from a federal agent Steven Coffman, stating that there are numerous signs of forgery in his Selective Service Certificate. It contained a letter from a renown expert Sandra Line, stating that there are signs of forgery in Obama's short version Certification of Live Birth, and original birth certificate needs to be reviewed in order to ascertain his status. It contained 130 current job positions for Barry Obama, Barack H. Obama and Michelle Obama, that were obtained from Intellius Jobs.com. None of them were reported on Obamas' tax returns. All of these documents suggest possible massive tax fraud, corruption of a public official, bribery and massive campaign contributions fraud, whereby large campaign contributions, over allowed limits were reported as fictitious positions with different companies, not surprisingly involving most mainstream media outlets. These need to be reviewed in light of a pattern, I've seen previously. For example, as a State Senator Obama arranged for his friend Robert Blackwell from killerspin to get a grant of $320,000 of our taxpayers money for his ping-pong tournaments. In exchange Blackwell gave Obama back roughly a third, $100,000 in the form of a salary. Similarly Obama arranged for Chicago university hospital to get 1 million grant of our taxpayer money and they gave him back roughly a third $357,000 in the form of a board salary for his wife Michelle for working 20 hours a week, even though Michelle was totally worthless as a board member since she had zero medical education and her law licence is on a mandatory inactive status (I wonder why).

I am writing this in a hurry, ready to leave my hotel room, finishing yesterday's dinner leftovers and ready to board a plane for a grueling flight back home. I'll add one more detail. As one of the announcers introduced Roberts, he stated that Roberts has his priorities straight. He described an event when Roberts missed most of a reception because he wanted to be there for his young son, at the sports tournament where his son was participating. He described Roberts as a caring and loving father. At that point I was just about ready to cry. I have 3 sons, I love them too and I would love to be there, attending their events. I am a proud parent. My oldest son scored in top one percent in the Nation in PSATs and he is in an IVY league school studying to be a doctor. He is also a gifted comedian, who formed a stand up comedy improve group and I would love to see him perform. My wo younger sons are great students. My middle son has a beautiful low bass Elvis Presley voice, he sings opera and I would love to hear him perform. My youngest son is a top student taking 5AP classes in tenth grade, gifted mathematician and basketball player, I would love to see him get academic awards and play basketball. I missed time with my children, time that will never come back because a am criss crossing this country talking to Justices of the Supreme court, Representatives, Senators, FBI agents, Attorney Generals, US attorneys, telling all of them, what is wrong with you? Did some evil magician put a spell on the men in this country and they stopped being men? Why are you afraid to speak up, to stand up for you constitution? Why are you afraid to tell this arrogant jerk from Africa and Indonesia- You need to go home, you cannot be a president and commander in chief because you are not a Natural born Citizen. To be a Natural born Citizen you have to have both parents as citizens. Your father was never a US citizen and you don't qualify and you also spit us in the face by refusing to unseal your vital records. There is no proof that you are even a citizen. For all we know, you need to go back to Kenya and wait for your green card, and that after we try you for all the crimes perpetrated upon American citizens. I hope Justice Roberts teaches his son that he is a descendant of people that were real men and fought in Alamo and at Valley Forge. Chief Justice Roberts has a right to issue a stay and appoint Joe Biden a president pro-tempore until Obama proves his qualifications or until a new president is chosen. I hope Roberts teaches his son by example and not by empty words.
Posted by Dr. Orly Taitz at 3/14/2009 5:47 AM
 

Hanta Yo

Well-known member
I sure hope the Secret Service guy, Gilbert Shaw doesn't make that box strangely "disappear". I also hope Dr. Orly Taitz has a LOT of copies of his stuff, he may need them.
 

Tam

Well-known member
I would think if that if a massive group on multiple campuses witnessed the events mentioned that the Chief Justice would have a very hard time explaining where the documents disappeared to.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Her contacting the Chief Justice- and presenting evidence not properly laid out or presented under evidentiary grounds- and the ability for the defense to properly challenge or dispute any of its admissability-- probably just created a "conflict of interest" for Roberts ability to now hear any case connected to them or issue any ruling involving the case..
If it ever got to the Supreme Court since a conflict of interest exists- even if no improper act results from it- it creates an appearance of impropriety that can undermine confidence in the conflicted individual, organization, or public- so Roberts would probably have to recuse himself from the case...
That would take out the strongest conservative on the SCOTUS- and leave the decision to an 8 person panel....
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Her contacting the Chief Justice- and presenting evidence not properly laid out or presented under evidentiary grounds- and the ability for the defense to properly challenge or dispute any of its admissability-- probably just created a "conflict of interest" for Roberts ability to now hear any case connected to them or issue any ruling involving the case..
If it ever got to the Supreme Court since a conflict of interest exists- even if no improper act results from it- it creates an appearance of impropriety that can undermine confidence in the conflicted individual, organization, or public- so Roberts would probably have to recuse himself from the case...
That would take out the strongest conservative on the SCOTUS- and leave the decision to an 8 person panel....

What's the difference between her giving him the information and a clerk giving him the very same information?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Sandhusker said:
Oldtimer said:
Her contacting the Chief Justice- and presenting evidence not properly laid out or presented under evidentiary grounds- and the ability for the defense to properly challenge or dispute any of its admissability-- probably just created a "conflict of interest" for Roberts ability to now hear any case connected to them or issue any ruling involving the case..
If it ever got to the Supreme Court since a conflict of interest exists- even if no improper act results from it- it creates an appearance of impropriety that can undermine confidence in the conflicted individual, organization, or public- so Roberts would probably have to recuse himself from the case...
That would take out the strongest conservative on the SCOTUS- and leave the decision to an 8 person panel....

What's the difference between her giving him the information and a clerk giving him the very same information?

Both would create a conflict- but this public action of doing so would raise a much higher public perception of impropriety...
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Sandhusker said:
How can the clerk create a conflict when going through the clerk is the proper procedure?

So you can walk up to a Judge anytime you want to on the street and present them with "evidence" you want reviewed in your case :???:

The info wasn't filed thru the clerk- it went into his and his SS mans care and custody....It creates a public perception of his reading it, no matter if he doesn't - rather than the filings- and could/does create the perception of impropriety...

All Roberts was doing was a very smart political move in a public setting to get a rightwingernut whackjob off his case....
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Sandhusker said:
How can the clerk create a conflict when going through the clerk is the proper procedure?

So you can walk up to a Judge anytime you want to on the street and present them with "evidence" you want reviewed in your case :???:

The info wasn't filed thru the clerk- it went into his and his SS mans care and custody....It creates a public perception of his reading it, no matter if he doesn't - rather than the filings- and could/does create the perception of impropriety...

All Roberts was doing was a very smart political move in a public setting to get a rightwingernut whackjob off his case....

He accepted it, didn't he? If you couldn't present them with evidence, would he of taken it? He'd be breaking the law.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Sandhusker said:
Oldtimer said:
Sandhusker said:
How can the clerk create a conflict when going through the clerk is the proper procedure?

So you can walk up to a Judge anytime you want to on the street and present them with "evidence" you want reviewed in your case :???:

The info wasn't filed thru the clerk- it went into his and his SS mans care and custody....It creates a public perception of his reading it, no matter if he doesn't - rather than the filings- and could/does create the perception of impropriety...

All Roberts was doing was a very smart political move in a public setting to get a rightwingernut whackjob off his case....

He accepted it, didn't he? If you couldn't present them with evidence, would he of taken it? He'd be breaking the law.


Like I said- he knew what he was doing....All Roberts was doing was a very smart political move in a public setting to get a rightwingernut whackjob off his case....
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
I'm sure he does know what he's doing. And I'm sure he wouldn't violate the law by accepting documents that he couldn't accept, especially in front of a crowd.

You bet, she's a whack job - but you libs are the ones who have no explaination for why Obama is spending thousands of dollars to keep a document hidden that has no reason to be kept hidden.

I agree with you on one point, there is a whacked rational going on here, but it's the people who critisize without being able to answer the above question.
 

Lonecowboy

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Her contacting the Chief Justice- and presenting evidence not properly laid out or presented under evidentiary grounds- and the ability for the defense to properly challenge or dispute any of its admissability-- probably just created a "conflict of interest" for Roberts ability to now hear any case connected to them or issue any ruling involving the case..
If it ever got to the Supreme Court since a conflict of interest exists- even if no improper act results from it- it creates an appearance of impropriety that can undermine confidence in the conflicted individual, organization, or public- so Roberts would probably have to recuse himself from the case...
That would take out the strongest conservative on the SCOTUS- and leave the decision to an 8 person panel....

wouldn't all the justices have to recuse thenselves then??
they all met privatly with obama
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Lonecowboy said:
Oldtimer said:
Her contacting the Chief Justice- and presenting evidence not properly laid out or presented under evidentiary grounds- and the ability for the defense to properly challenge or dispute any of its admissability-- probably just created a "conflict of interest" for Roberts ability to now hear any case connected to them or issue any ruling involving the case..
If it ever got to the Supreme Court since a conflict of interest exists- even if no improper act results from it- it creates an appearance of impropriety that can undermine confidence in the conflicted individual, organization, or public- so Roberts would probably have to recuse himself from the case...
That would take out the strongest conservative on the SCOTUS- and leave the decision to an 8 person panel....

wouldn't all the justices have to recuse thenselves then??
they all met privatly with obama

On this issue :???:
 

Lonecowboy

Well-known member
The Supreme Court’s actions now may become the subject of further questions, because Obama visited with the justices in their private chambers in a meeting closed to the public just before his inauguration. Taitz said a defendant in a legal action meeting with the judges who are deciding the case without have a representative from the other side is unprecedented ? and unacceptable.

“I will file a motion to the chief justice to compel the records of this private meeting, that was held only a few days before my case was supposed to be heard,” Taitz said in a posting on her website.


“I would like to get information about what was discussed,” she told WND in an interview. “It’s unheard of for the Supreme Court to meet with [one] party when a case is pending.”

Multiple reports confirmed Obama met in private with eight of the nine justices. Justice Samuel Alito was absent.

http://www.uslaw.com/library/Obama_Citizenship/WND_Dr_Taitz_Request_Records_Private_SCOTUS_Meeting_Obama.php?item=363834

I was wrong, allito wasn't there !!
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Lonecowboy said:
The Supreme Court’s actions now may become the subject of further questions, because Obama visited with the justices in their private chambers in a meeting closed to the public just before his inauguration. Taitz said a defendant in a legal action meeting with the judges who are deciding the case without have a representative from the other side is unprecedented ? and unacceptable.

“I will file a motion to the chief justice to compel the records of this private meeting, that was held only a few days before my case was supposed to be heard,” Taitz said in a posting on her website.


“I would like to get information about what was discussed,” she told WND in an interview. “It’s unheard of for the Supreme Court to meet with [one] party when a case is pending.”

Multiple reports confirmed Obama met in private with eight of the nine justices. Justice Samuel Alito was absent.

http://www.uslaw.com/library/Obama_Citizenship/WND_Dr_Taitz_Request_Records_Private_SCOTUS_Meeting_Obama.php?item=363834

I think she's 'Tilting at windmills' anymore- but it'll get her publicity and make her money.....The rightwingernut extremist bunch are followers and will follow anything she does from now on...
 

Lonecowboy

Well-known member
OT,the one thing I can't seem to get figured out, why doesn't every American want obama to prove up??
just to shut everyone up if nothing else
Wouldn't you like him to prove us all wrong?? so you could say "see, I told you so!"
I would love it for obama to prove up and prove us all wrong!!
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Lonecowboy said:
The Supreme Court’s actions now may become the subject of further questions, because Obama visited with the justices in their private chambers in a meeting closed to the public just before his inauguration. Taitz said a defendant in a legal action meeting with the judges who are deciding the case without have a representative from the other side is unprecedented ? and unacceptable.

“I will file a motion to the chief justice to compel the records of this private meeting, that was held only a few days before my case was supposed to be heard,” Taitz said in a posting on her website.


“I would like to get information about what was discussed,” she told WND in an interview. “It’s unheard of for the Supreme Court to meet with [one] party when a case is pending.”

Multiple reports confirmed Obama met in private with eight of the nine justices. Justice Samuel Alito was absent.

http://www.uslaw.com/library/Obama_Citizenship/WND_Dr_Taitz_Request_Records_Private_SCOTUS_Meeting_Obama.php?item=363834

I think she's 'Tilting at windmills' anymore- but it'll get her publicity and make her money.....The rightwingernut extremist bunch are followers and will follow anything she does from now on...

"When asked in court to produce evidence of his eligibility, Obama has declined to do so, even in the face of the considerable time, expense and trouble that is needed to avoid providing this evidence."

WHY?
 

Hypo2

New member
Hypocritexposer Here: Needed to use a different logon. Lost my password, and don't have access to my email.

Earlier in the week, Taitz confronted Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who told her the issue of Obama's eligibility, which has been raised before the Supreme Court at least four times but has yet to be given a single hearing, still lacked the votes of the required four justices in conference before it would be officially heard.

She says Scalia responded, "Bring the case, I'll hear it, I don't know about others."

According to Orly Taitz, the attorney who confronted Chief Justice John Roberts at a lecture at the University of Idaho, the judge promised before the gathered crowd that he would, indeed, read and review the briefs and petition.

Sounds like what she is saying is that she has got confirmation from another judge, that he will hear the case.
 

Lonecowboy

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Looks to me like he already has an out of court settlement...

Sad, but hopefully not true :(

If the scotus can be bought off, then is there any wonder that there are
"Defenders of the Constitution" groups forming, somebody has to do the job. If there is no chance at justice in the courts is there any wonder why
"Millitia" groups are being formed??

I hope you are wrong on this one OT, and obama didn't find some way to blackmail or buy off the scotus-- if so then it would fit in very well with the contentions of the "obama Deception" movie.
 
Top