• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Keystone XL seems to still be be important to some

Faster horses

Well-known member
Just a little article from a small-town SE Montana newspaper:

Posted December 13, 2013

By Lori Kesinger

TransCanada’s Keystone XL Pipeline project has been delayed most likely until next year as it waits for a final review from the U.S. State Department. President Obama has delegated the State Department the task of determining whether the pipeline is in the U.S. national interest.

The proposed Keystone XL Pipeline is a system to transport crude oil from the oil sands of Alberta, Canada, and the northern U.S. to refineries near the Gulf of Mexico. An on-ramp called the Bakken MarketLink will intersect with the pipeline at Baker providing a terminal to export oil being produced from the Bakken formation. Most of the Bakken oil is currently being transported by tanker or rail car.

Proponents say the pipeline will create jobs, increase tax revenue, and gain energy independence for the U.S. Montana Senators Max Baucus and Jon Tester, and Congressman Steve Daines all support the pipeline project. Congressman Steve Daines was among four members of Congress testifying at a hearing in September on “Keystone’s Red Tape Anniversary: Five Years of Bureaucratic Delay and Economic Benefits Denied”. “These days in Washington, it’s hard to find many measures Republicans and Democrats agree on. The Keystone Pipeline’s bipartisan support should be telling,” Daines said. “This is common sense. Montanans support the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline and are ready to move. Why are we still waiting?”

Local supporters of the pipeline should contact Montana Senators and Congressman to inquire what they are currently doing to get the pipeline approved.

Contact by letter, fax, phone or website:

Senator Max Baucus

Honorable Max Baucus

US Senate

511 Hart Senate Building



Washington, DC 20510-2602
http://www.falloncountyextra.com/tag/bakken-marketlink/
----------------------------------------------------------

Since it has only been on hold for 5 years now, Kerry is in no hurry but makes a promise: "I can promise our friends in Canada that all the appropriate effort is being put into trying to get this done effectively and rapidly," Kerry added. (Isn't that a crack-up????)



Associated Press January 17, 2014
WASHINGTON — Brushing aside pressure from Canada, Secretary of State John Kerry said Friday that the United States will not be pushed into making a decision on the long-delayed Keystone XL pipeline.

At a joint appearance with Canada's foreign affairs minister, John Baird, Kerry said he has not received a crucial environmental report on the $7 billion pipeline, which would carry oil from western Canada to refineries in Texas.

"My hope is that before long, that analysis will be available, and then my work begins," Kerry said, referring to a recommendation he is expected to make on whether the pipeline is in the U.S. national interest. The State Department has jurisdiction over the pipeline because it crosses an international border.

Kerry, who has rarely spoken about the pipeline since taking office a year ago, said "a lot of questions" were raised about the project in a lengthy public comment period the State Department conducted. "Those comments have necessitated appropriate answers," he said.

"I can promise our friends in Canada that all the appropriate effort is being put into trying to get this done effectively and rapidly," Kerry added.

Kerry's comments came as Baird, his counterpart in Canada, concluded a three-day visit to Washington in which he repeatedly urged U.S. officials to decide quickly on the pipeline, which was first proposed by Calgary-based TransCanada in 2008.

"If there's one message I'm going to be promoting on this trip, it's this: the time for Keystone is now. I'll go further — the time for a decision on Keystone is now, even if it's not the right one," Baird told a U.S. Chamber of Commerce luncheon this week. "We can't continue in this state of limbo."

The pipeline plan has become a flashpoint in the U.S. debate over climate change. Environmental groups have pressured President Barack Obama to reject the pipeline, saying it would carry "dirty oil" derived from tar sands and exacerbate global warming. They also worry about a spill.

Lawmakers from oil-producing states, as well as business and labor groups, have urged Obama to approve the pipeline as a source of much-needed jobs and a step toward North American energy independence.

Speaking across the street from the White House, Baird said he expects the State Department review, known as an environmental impact statement, to be released soon after Obama's Jan. 28 State of the Union address, with a final decision after that.

The renewed lobbying on the pipeline comes as TransCanada is poised to begin shipping oil from the pipeline's southern leg next week. A 485-mile segment from Cushing, Okla., to the Houston region is slated to begin shipping oil on Wednesday.

The $2.3 billion southern leg does not require State Department approval because it does not cross a U.S. border. The northern segment would run 1,179 miles from Alberta, Canada, to Steele City, Neb. The pipeline would connect to Cushing through an existing, 298-mile spur.

A spokesman for TransCanada said Friday the company believes U.S. officials have "more than enough information" to approve Keystone XL.

"Our customers continue to need the product we will deliver, (the pipeline) continues to receive extremely strong support from Republicans and Democrats in public opinion polls, and more than 9,000 American construction workers are standing by to build this important piece of modern energy infrastructure," said Shawn Howard, a TransCanada spokesman.

Read more here: http://www.bnd.com/2014/01/17/3010345/kerry-no-rush-to-decide-on-keystone.html#storylink=cpy :D
 

mrj

Well-known member
The SD Cheyenne River Reservation leaders have come out against the Keystone Pipeline, which seems ludicrous as the route isn't even near that area. Environmental purity seems pretty low priority on most reservation towns, in any case!

It isn't going through our ranch, but is nearby, and some of the ranchers whose land is being crossed by Keystone are happy with their treatment, and the pay they will get.

Then, there are the county roads which will be re-built and maintained where Keystone has facilities to tend, as well as generous payments in taxes to our counties. Anytime someone besides the property owners chips in a little taxes is a GOOD thing!!

There are always those who love to hate any new project which they believe will make others "rich"..........yet another proof of success of liberal politicians' efforts at training people to envy others perceived to be somehow better off than themselves.

mrj
 

littlejoe

Well-known member
"The SD Cheyenne River Reservation leaders have come out against the Keystone Pipeline, which seems ludicrous as the route isn't even near that area"

Not too surprising--Vancouver harbour people have lots to say--against--oil or lng terminals up around prince Rupert.

My Canadian oil patch buds have said 'hell, we can't get too mad at U.S. over keystone deal---we can't even get a line thru our own country!"
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
littlejoe said:
"The SD Cheyenne River Reservation leaders have come out against the Keystone Pipeline, which seems ludicrous as the route isn't even near that area"

Not too surprising--Vancouver harbour people have lots to say--against--oil or lng terminals up around prince Rupert.

My Canadian oil patch buds have said 'hell, we can't get too mad at U.S. over keystone deal---we can't even get a line thru our own country!"


Environmentalists paid Canadian Indian chief to oppose oil drilling

12:15 PM 01/20/2014

Who ever said opposing oil development doesn’t pay? Environmentalists have been caught wiring money to the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation in Canada to oppose drilling for oil sands.

The Toronto Sun reports that the Tides Foundation paid $55,000 Athabasca Chipewyan Chief Allan Adam to oppose the development of oil sands in Canada. The San Francisco-based Tides Foundation is a grant-giving organization that provides “fiscal sponsorship for over 230 groups across the country” operates and supports environmental groups and grants “millions each year to charitable organizations across the globe.”

According to journalist Ezra Levant, this is a huge problem because Chief Adam is an elected official of the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation, meaning that Tides gave money to a public official for opposing oil sands development.


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/01/20/environmentalists-paid-canadian-indian-chief-to-oppose-oil-drilling/#ixzz2rQOFW4N5
 

Mike

Well-known member
Environmentalists paid Canadian Indian chief to oppose oil drilling

12:15 PM 01/20/2014

Who ever said opposing oil development doesn’t pay? Environmentalists have been caught wiring money to the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation in Canada to oppose drilling for oil sands.

The Toronto Sun reports that the Tides Foundation paid $55,000 Athabasca Chipewyan Chief Allan Adam to oppose the development of oil sands in Canada. The San Francisco-based Tides Foundation is a grant-giving organization that provides “fiscal sponsorship for over 230 groups across the country” operates and supports environmental groups and grants “millions each year to charitable organizations across the globe.”

According to journalist Ezra Levant, this is a huge problem because Chief Adam is an elected official of the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation, meaning that Tides gave money to a public official for opposing oil sands development.


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/01/20/environmentalists-paid-canadian-indian-chief-to-oppose-oil-drilling/#ixzz2rQOFW4N5

Yep. Another multinational environmental group muscling away at Keystone.

NOT the NIMBY's as you earlier proclaimed. :roll:
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Congratulations to the people of TransCanada, Inc., whose long fight to connect the tar-sands-oil-pumping Keystone pipeline to the Gulf Coast of America finally reached fruition on Wednesday. Even without Keystone XL being approved.

The company announced that oil is now flowing through its Gulf Coast pipeline, a 487-mile stretch of pipe running from Cushing, Oklahoma, to Nederland, Texas. It's the orange dotted segment on that map, but dotted/under construction no longer.

If you follow that map backwards, you see that the oil in Cushing arrives there via the (green) Cushing Extension pipeline, which runs from Steele City, Nebraska, south. Then, the (brown) Keystone Pipeline, original version, which runs from Hardisty, Alberta to Steele City.

http://news.yahoo.com/oil-pipeline-canadian-tar-sands-gulf-coast-complete-223638727.html;_ylt=AwrSyCWK6.NS50cAw0j_wgt.
 

Steve

Well-known member
Chief Adam is an elected official of the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation, meaning that Tides gave money to a public official for opposing oil sands development.

isn't that called a bribe?
 

Tam

Well-known member
The good Chief proved he can be bought, so one has to wonder if the oil executives had got to him first how much it would have cost to buy his support for the pipeline?
 
Top