• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Korea Wants To Choose Processors

Mike

Well-known member
S. Korea, US Wrestle Over Unresolved Beef Issues



WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--Contentious issues must still be be worked out before the U.S. will be able to begin exporting beef to South Korea, despite substantial progress made recently by both countries toward trade resumption, according to U.S. government and industry officials.



South Korea still has not publicly released the results of a two-week audit of 37 U.S. beef processing plants, but U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. industry officials say there are some "sticky issues" in it.



The primary "sticky issue," one USDA official said, is that South Korea does not want to agree with a "systems approach" to allow in U.S. beef, but rather wants to pick and choose individual U.S. plants that it will accept beef from.



"I don't see this as a done deal," the official said, expressing some concern over widespread expectations that South Korea will make some form of official announcement about U.S. beef exports on June 7.



The U.S. government and industry officials spoke on condition of anonymity because of the delicate nature of ongoing trade talks.



South Korea, U.S. officials said, want to be able to ban specific beef processors that have been shut out of trade with other countries for problems such a the discovery of bone fragments in shipments.



"It's not a science-based approach," a USDA official said.



USDA spokesman Ed Loyd did not comment on specifics of the trade talks, but did stress that these kinds of deals are always very complicated with uncertain outcomes.



Lynn Heinze, a spokesman for the U.S. Meat Export Federation, said that "beef exporters would like a clear understanding of how South Korea plans to deal with the bone-chip issue before trade resumes." He also stressed that U.S. companies are concerned about the difficulties of getting plants back on the list of eligible exporters after an importer such as Hong Kong "de-lists" them because of a problem.



Hong Kong has stopped accepting imports from three U.S. beef plants since it eased its ban in December 2005. All three of those actions were due to the discovery of bone fragments.



Swift & Company (SWT.Xx), Cargill Inc. (CRG.Xx) and Harris Ranch Beef Co. have all had plants taken off the list of producers that can ship beef to Honk Kong.



South Korea, like Hong Kong did months ago, has agreed to lift its ban only on boneless cuts of U.S. beef.



Most major foreign markets banned U.S. beef in December 2003 after the first case of mad-cow disease, or bovine spongiform encephalopathy, was discovered here. Some - like Hong Kong, Singapore and South Korea - only want to buy boneless beef as a condition for lifting those bans.



But USDA and U.S. industry officials say they are taking the term "boneless" too literally. USMEF's Heinze said "zero tolerance" is not possible.



The U.S., Mexico and Canada agreed years ago under the North American Free Trade Agreement on tolerances for minimal amounts of bone fragments in meat shipments and now some are calling for similar agreements with South Korea, Hong Kong and other trade partners.



USDA officials said they have already begun specific talks on bone fragment standards with Hong Kong and others.



Source: Bill Tomson, Dow Jones Newswires; 202-646-0088; [email protected]
 

Mike

Well-known member
Anyone See A Connection?


US Swift Petitions Hong Kong To Lift Ban On Beef Facility



WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--Swift & Company (SWT.Xx), a Colorado-based meat producer, with the help of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, is petitioning Hong Kong to lift a ban on one the company's beef-producing facilities.



Swift began making changes for beef production soon after Hong Kong suspended imports from the company's Greeley, Colo., facility because of a shipment containing bone fragments.



Sean McHugh, a Swift spokesman, said the company documented changes in its production procedures, such as new quality inspections and special Hong Kong beef labels, and the USDA delivered the information to Hong Kong.



Lloyd Day, head of USDA's Agricultural Marketing Service, told Dow Jones Newswires on Friday that the U.S. is now working with Hong Kong officials to to reach an agreement on bone-fragment tolerances in beef shipments in hopes of avoiding future trade disruptions.



Hong Kong has stopped accepting imports from three U.S. beef plants since it eased its ban on U.S. beef in December 2005. Hong Kong agreed in December to import only boneless cuts and all three of those actions were due to the discovery of bone fragments.



Small bone fragments are impossible to completely keep out of shipments, and they present no consumer safety risk, according to U.S. government and industry representatives.



Swift, Cargill Inc. (CRG.Xx) and Harris Ranch Beef Co. have each had a plant taken off the list of producers that can ship beef to Honk Kong.



McHugh said Swift is hopeful new protocols can be agreed on by the two governments. All would benefit, he said, from a "common set of rules."



Hong Kong, along with most major foreign markets, banned U.S. beef in December 2003 after the first case of mad-cow disease, or bovine spongiform encephalopathy, was discovered here.



Source: Bill Tomson, Dow Jones Newswires; 202-646-0088; [email protected]
 

Murgen

Well-known member
Connection would be that these 3 companies want to sell beef, even after breaking the rules!

3 questions though.

1) If the ability to make a greater profit exist in North america, due to "captive supplies", due to BSE, why would they bother?

2) Has BSE testing been asked for, from these 3 companies?

3) what producer group would have a problem with these 3 companies spending their money on promoting North American beef?
 

Latest posts

Top