A
Anonymous
Guest
Brad S said:As long as we agree the heritage foundation is the go to place for truth:
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2014/02/an-executive-unbound-the-obama-administrations-unilateral-actions
1. Abusive, unlawful, and even potentially unconstitutional unilateral action has been a hallmark of the Obama Administration.
2. When Congress refuses to accede to President Obama’s liberal policies, the Administration often ignores the restraints imposed on the executive branch by the Constitution in order to impose “laws” by executive fiat.
3. When the Administration disagrees with duly enacted laws or finds it politically expedient not to enforce them, it often ignores them, skirts them, or claims the Executive has prosecutorial discretion not to enforce them rather than fulfilling its constitutional obligation to take care that those laws be faithfully executed.
4. Examples include suspending implementation of the Obamacare employer mandate, abdicating the Administration’s duty to defend the law in court, implementing the DREAM Act, and unconstitutional “recess” appointments.
5. As the Framers understood, the “accumulation of all powers … in the same hands” is the “very definition of tyranny.”
The "VERY DEFINITION OF TYRANNY" isn't a positive legacy to us wingernut radical racist crazy ... (Could you guys devise a dismissive slur acronym, it'd be so much easier)
So why hasn't he been impeached ?