• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Latinos furious at Obama on immigration delay

A

Anonymous

Guest
Brad S said:
As long as we agree the heritage foundation is the go to place for truth:


http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2014/02/an-executive-unbound-the-obama-administrations-unilateral-actions


1. Abusive, unlawful, and even potentially unconstitutional unilateral action has been a hallmark of the Obama Administration.
2. When Congress refuses to accede to President Obama’s liberal policies, the Administration often ignores the restraints imposed on the executive branch by the Constitution in order to impose “laws” by executive fiat.
3. When the Administration disagrees with duly enacted laws or finds it politically expedient not to enforce them, it often ignores them, skirts them, or claims the Executive has prosecutorial discretion not to enforce them rather than fulfilling its constitutional obligation to take care that those laws be faithfully executed.
4. Examples include suspending implementation of the Obamacare employer mandate, abdicating the Administration’s duty to defend the law in court, implementing the DREAM Act, and unconstitutional “recess” appointments.
5. As the Framers understood, the “accumulation of all powers … in the same hands” is the “very definition of tyranny.”

The "VERY DEFINITION OF TYRANNY" isn't a positive legacy to us wingernut radical racist crazy ... (Could you guys devise a dismissive slur acronym, it'd be so much easier)

So why hasn't he been impeached ?
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
As you will see- Presidents have a lot of authority over law enforcement issues- and just like the Sheriff (the Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the county) has broad discretion over enforcement- so does the President as the Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the nation

And to think you willingly gave up all that power and prestige just to take care of your aging uncles.
 

Brad S

Well-known member
Should have been impeached. First, the Donks worship power so much, they'll never vote remove in the senate. The electorate , thanks to nea dumbed down public education, won't take their eyes off nascar or football or whatever to understand what's at issue. The electorate is civically illiterate and the Donks and half the GOP like it that way. So the Donks know they won't suffer voting to rid the country of the omama crime syndicate. Many unprincipled pubs are more worried about maintaining power then doing their political duty. Pub leadership doesn't want to look like lynching the first black president. If Obama did something really obviously bad on camera, like stabbed his wife, yes the electorate would scream impeach. But Obama calculates , mostly correctly, that his constitutional attacks can't and won't be understood by the electorate, and the Donks know this, and too few of the GOP have the honor to do the right thing in the face of political risk.

At this point, I say don't impeach, hang obamas failures on his supporters for ever.

But I said Carville's remark "drag a hunnerd dollah bill thru the trailah court and look what you get" when dismissing one of Klintons sex assault victims should condemn the entire donk party when none of them condemned the awful remark. I can't explain stupidity
 

Steve

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
loomixguy said:
Then please explain why Harry Reid has over 350 bills that passed the house, most all enjoying bipartisan support, gathering dust on his desk? Talk about doing nothing...you better check what your fellow cult members are up to before you start throwing stones.

Because 2 of the 3 legs did not want them to go any further (WH and Senate)...

the democrats.. harry,.. pislosi and obama "controlled" the 2 legs.. in the first two years of the obama presidency

the court wouldn't have a say until they passed a law..

but they didn't do a darn thing to fix the mess they have created over the years...
 

Latest posts

Top