• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Legality of ID System Questioned

Help Support Ranchers.net:

Tommy

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
755
Reaction score
0
Location
South East Kansas
Legality of ID System Questioned


01/27 17:50


-USDA May Not Have Legal Authority for a Mandatory System Run by Private Entities

By Jerry Hagstrom DTN Political Correspondent

DENVER (DTN) -- Though Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns has been enthusiastically promoting the development of a privately-held national identification system for all livestock animals, Agriculture Department lawyers have not determined whether USDA has the legal authority to institute a mandatory system operated by private entities, a key USDA official said last week.

USDA officials maintain that the Animal Health Protection Act, which was passed as part of the 2002 farm bill, gives USDA authority to develop a national animal identification system, but Neil Hammerschmidt, the coordinator of the proposed National Animal Identification System at the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, said at a meeting of the Ranchers-Farmers Action Legal Fund-United Stockgrowers of America that the agency's lawyers have not determined whether that authority extends to requiring ranchers and other owners of livestock animals to make reports to a private entity.

USDA officials are working on the assumption that the program would be self-policing rather than require inspection and enforcement by USDA employees, Hammerschmidt said.

The pressure to create a better system for tracing the source of animal disease has grown since December 2003 when a cow in Washington state tested positive for bovine spongiform encephalopathy or mad cow disease and other countries closed their borders to U.S. beef. Government and industry officials believe the identification system would make it possible to trace the source of animal disease within 48 hours and would reassure trading partners.

Livestock groups initially expected the government to pay for the system, but on Aug. 30 Johanns announced he wanted to set up a private system which the federal and state governments could access at no cost. APHIS Deputy Administrator John Clifford has also said USDA does not expect to analyze the cost to producers because the system would be private.

At the R-CALF USA meeting, Athol Economou, a director of the Australian Beef Association said that the Australian animal identification system had resulted in substantial costs to ranchers. Economou said the system appears to be only partially effective. Packers and processors are supposed to send reports to ranchers on the disposition of all animals born on their ranches, he said, but ranchers receive reports on only about 50 percent of the animals.

R-CALF USA passed a resolution in opposition to a mandatory animal identification program, saying that most cattle diseases are foreign and that it would be easier and cheaper to keep out diseases with tougher border security.
 

TimH

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
1,421
Reaction score
0
Location
Southwest Manitoba
"At the R-CALF USA meeting, Athol Economou, a director of the Australian...."

Athol??? :???: Athol????? :???: :???:

I wonder how many parenths name their kidth "Athol" in Authtralia?? :shock:
 

cowsense

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
1,394
Reaction score
0
Location
Central Saskatchewan
Tim....... there was a whole slew of "ATHHOLS" that stated cattle diseases are foreign and all they gotta do is close their borders!! :???: :???: :? :shock:
 

PORKER

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 2, 2005
Messages
4,170
Reaction score
0
Location
Michigan-Florida
Livestock groups initially expected the government to pay for the system, but on Aug. 30 Johanns announced he wanted to set up a private system which the federal and state governments could access at no cost. APHIS Deputy Administrator John Clifford has also said USDA does not expect to analyze the cost to producers because the system would be private.

At the R-CALF USA meeting, Athol Economou, a director of the Australian Beef Association said that the Australian animal identification system had resulted in substantial costs to ranchers. Economou said the system appears to be only partially effective. Packers and processors are supposed to send reports to ranchers on the disposition of all animals born on their ranches, he said, but ranchers receive reports on only about 50 percent of the animals.

Wonder why the Australian animal identification system had needed $16 millon in funds to rebuild their database? Could and would have been much cheaper to have had a good bunch of engineers from a traceback and RFID company like www.scoringag.com to use.
 

William Kanitz

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 8, 2005
Messages
134
Reaction score
0
Location
Sarasota Florida
Thanks for the Tip,Porker.We are working on the Mexican Crop Traceback and their Animal ID system at this time.
Wonder why the Australian animal identification system had needed $16 millon in funds to rebuild their database?It doesn't Work Porker and we may be asked to fix it,cattle just disappear and the system can't tell the difference between good data and false data entrys and it doesn't run in real time.
 

Latest posts

Top