• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Levin on Hannity last night re: wire tapping

Faster horses

Well-known member
(After posting this, I found the youtube video and posted it under "Levin blows up on Hannity 3/6/17) Don't miss that video.

He pretty much closes the case. Trump was wiretapped.

Mark Levin on Trump wiretapping claims: 'We're talking about police state tactics'

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/03/07/mark-levin-on-trump-wiretapping-claims-were-talking-about-police-state-tactics.html

Radio host Mark Levin stood by President Trump's claim Monday that President Obama tapped his phones during last year's campaign, alleging that the now-former chief executive engaged in "police state tactics."

Levin cited a New York Times story from January that reported that "intercepted communications" were being used in a multi-agency investigation into links between Russian officials and Trump campaign personnel.

WHITE HOUSE OFFICIALS STAND BY TRUMP'S WIRETAPPING CLAIM

"We know that if a FISA warrant [against Trump's campaign] was secured, it’s very likely ... the president would be given a heads-up," Levin told Fox News' "Hannity." "I assume Obama knew something. I mean, unless he’s Helen Keller."

Trump has offered no evidence to support his contention in a series of tweets Saturday morning, though he appeared to be addressing claims Levin made on his radio show about alleged efforts by the Obama administration to undermine the Trump campaign. Levin's timeline was drawn from a range of other news reports and sources, including the Times, The Washington Post and The Guardian.




"The reason I got fed up with this last week is I’m a constitutional conservative," Levin told host Sean Hannity. "We have a runaway executive branch. I don’t know who knows what, and as of today, the media don’t appear to know who knows what, which is exactly why I’ve been calling for a congressional investigation."

Levin also took aim at former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who categorically denied Trump's claims Sunday on NBC's "Meet The Press." Levin said Clapper's denial "contradicts every piece of significant reporting over the last six months."

"Why all the investigations?" Levin asked. "Was there evidence – a scintilla of evidence at all – that Trump, his campaign advisers, and his transition team were on the take?"

"None," Hannity responded.

"OK, then," Levin answered, "why are six federal departments and agencies involved in an investigation and now Clapper says he doesn’t know anything?"

In addition to a congressional investigation, Levin called for any FISA requests by the Obama administration involving the Trump campaign to be made public.

"We have a real problem right now," Levin said. "The media’s turning on the media, we have leaks coming out that are felonies, we have stories about six federal departments and agencies – intelligence and law enforcement – that were investigating something, somebody, somehow. So what’s the answer?"
 

Steve

Well-known member
"OK, then," Levin answered, "why are six federal departments and agencies involved in an investigation and now Clapper says he doesn’t know anything?"

Is it just to easy for the liberal left to understand?


for weeks now we have heard baseless accusations based on sources "within" the goverment.

This begs the question, Where did they get the intel from? someone had to do the "act" of surveillance.
WASHINGTON — Phone records and intercepted calls show that members of Donald J. Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign and other Trump associates had repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence officials in the year before the election, according to four current and former American officials.

American law enforcement and intelligence agencies intercepted the communications around the same time they were discovering evidence that Russia was trying to disrupt the presidential election by hacking into the Democratic National Committee, three of the officials said. The intelligence agencies then sought to learn whether the Trump campaign was colluding with the Russians on the hacking or other efforts to influence the election.

The officials interviewed in recent weeks said that, so far, they had seen no evidence of such cooperation.

so who got bugged? who was surveiled?
The officials said the intercepted communications were not limited to Trump campaign officials, and included other associates of Mr. Trump.

The officials declined to identify the other Trump associates on the calls.

The call logs and intercepted communications are part of a larger trove of information that the F.B.I. is sifting through as it investigates the links between Mr. Trump’s associates and the Russian government
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/14/us/politics/russia-intelligence-communications-trump.html?_r=0

so now they "claim" Trump wasn't wiretapped, as he has no evidence.

Isn't the consistent leaks themselves evidence of surveillance?

or were they fake news based on unfunded rumors?


Sadly Donald used the term wiretapped, that is so old school and a no longer relevant term for the techie left.. (unless it is to promote their agenda)

Donald should just claim that Obama and his administration spied on not only his campaign, but new evidence supports they did not stop the surveillance after the election.
 

Tam

Well-known member
What gets me is Obama's press release said they didn't order any wiretaps but then Obama's former speech writer came out and warned people to not take the Obama press release to say there was no wiretap only that Obama did not order it.

There was another liberal reporter that was on Watter's World talking to Kimbery G. on Sat. night and she said her source, that worked for the Obama White House for 7 years said the White House did know about the wiretaps as they were talking about them within the White House.

Then you have all the liberal rags printing stories about the wiretap info being delivered to the White House.

We also have Hillary tweeting about info collected on Trump, and Robby Mook her campaign manager just this morning talking about reading transcripts of Trump assoc. talking to Russians.

Clapper said he didn't know anything about the wiretaps but then he was lying as he could not even look the interviewer in the eye when he said it.

SO Trump using the words Wire Tap was likely due to the media calling them that. But that said it does not matter what you call them there is enough evidence out now to surely make people stop and think about where the info came from and who obtained the info.

The reporter tonight said there is a confirmation a FISA warrant was granted in Oct. but a second warrant was also granted to look at the Russian Bank to Trump Tower which turned out to be SPAM. She said they have the proof that the FISA warrant turned up NOTHING linking Trump's campaign to Russia. We also have the FBI< CIA< NSA< DNI report that Obama demanded before leaving office saying NO LINK FOUND So why are the Dems demanding an investigation into Russia Trump Links when intel investigation proved THERE WAS NO LINK.

If it turns out that someone in the OBAMA CIA used their little cloaking program to make it look like Russia had hacked Podesta do you think any of the Dems are going to apologize to Russia and the American public for all their accusations made on behave of their Party's corrupt Candidate????? NO I don't think so either.

I still believe the DNC was not hacked and they know it was an inside job due to the fact the DNC cheated to make sure Bernie was not the nominee. They refused to let the FBI examine their servers to see if there was any evidence to prove a hacking took place. Why would they do that and what were they HIDING from the FBI? They had the Russia Podesta hack to fall back on to explain away their internal LEAK. I think it was Seth Rich and he was shot in the head to stop him from testifying against Hillary like he was reportedly scheduled to. If he had testified under oath to the fact he leaked the DNC emails the hole Russia story was going to start unraveling. Could not have that so Clinton had her little clean up squad to take care of that little mess. The police still have not come clean on that case as they ruled it a robbery gone bad yet his wallet was still on his body.

The Dems are corrupt to the Core and Obama was right up there will Hillary in the top spot as thee Most Corrupt.

If Obama doesn't have anything to hide and is not going after Trump to destroy him then why does he need to set up his Organizing for America in the privacy of his own mansion with Valerie Jarrett living there with him?
 

mrj

Well-known member
Tam said:
What gets me is Obama's press release said they didn't order any wiretaps but then Obama's former speech writer came out and warned people to not take the Obama press release to say there was no wiretap only that Obama did not order it.

There was another liberal reporter that was on Watter's World talking to Kimbery G. on Sat. night and she said her source, that worked for the Obama White House for 7 years said the White House did know about the wiretaps as they were talking about them within the White House.

Then you have all the liberal rags printing stories about the wiretap info being delivered to the White House.

We also have Hillary tweeting about info collected on Trump, and Robby Mook her campaign manager just this morning talking about reading transcripts of Trump assoc. talking to Russians.

Clapper said he didn't know anything about the wiretaps but then he was lying as he could not even look the interviewer in the eye when he said it.

SO Trump using the words Wire Tap was likely due to the media calling them that. But that said it does not matter what you call them there is enough evidence out now to surely make people stop and think about where the info came from and who obtained the info.

The reporter tonight said there is a confirmation a FISA warrant was granted in Oct. but a second warrant was also granted to look at the Russian Bank to Trump Tower which turned out to be SPAM. She said they have the proof that the FISA warrant turned up NOTHING linking Trump's campaign to Russia. We also have the FBI< CIA< NSA< DNI report that Obama demanded before leaving office saying NO LINK FOUND So why are the Dems demanding an investigation into Russia Trump Links when intel investigation proved THERE WAS NO LINK.

If it turns out that someone in the OBAMA CIA used their little cloaking program to make it look like Russia had hacked Podesta do you think any of the Dems are going to apologize to Russia and the American public for all their accusations made on behave of their Party's corrupt Candidate????? NO I don't think so either.

I still believe the DNC was not hacked and they know it was an inside job due to the fact the DNC cheated to make sure Bernie was not the nominee. They refused to let the FBI examine their servers to see if there was any evidence to prove a hacking took place. Why would they do that and what were they HIDING from the FBI? They had the Russia Podesta hack to fall back on to explain away their internal LEAK. I think it was Seth Rich and he was shot in the head to stop him from testifying against Hillary like he was reportedly scheduled to. If he had testified under oath to the fact he leaked the DNC emails the hole Russia story was going to start unraveling. Could not have that so Clinton had her little clean up squad to take care of that little mess. The police still have not come clean on that case as they ruled it a robbery gone bad yet his wallet was still on his body.

The Dems are corrupt to the Core and Obama was right up there will Hillary in the top spot as thee Most Corrupt.

If Obama doesn't have anything to hide and is not going after Trump to destroy him then why does he need to set up his Organizing for America in the privacy of his own mansion with Valerie Jarrett living there with him?

Tam, I've wondered about that DNC incident where the goal was to stop Bernie from beating Hillary. Someplace, I heard that Russians did the deed attempting to assure Hilary became President. It just seems like there has been little attempt to uncover facts about any of this.......that it makes 'the unthinkable'......that the corruption goes to the very core of our highest federal office, the Obama administration and 'their' investigative agencies........the very groups who should be our agencies earning and most deserving of our absolute trust. It is going to be devastating to our peace of mind if this issue isn't resolved in a very clear manner, one way or the other!

mrj
 

Tam

Well-known member
Why would Russia want Hillary to win the nomination only to take her out in the general? I believe the Russian's had NOTHING to do with any of this and are sitting back Laughing their butts off at the Dems pulling their hair out trying to link Russia to Trump when all evidence they have proves there is NO LINK.

The DNC emails were leaked out by a Bernie supporter when he/she found out Debbie Wasserman Shcultz and Donna Brazile were cheating for Hillary. If this is not what happen why would the DNC not allow the FBI to examine their servers?

After Hillary won the nomination I believe the intel agents that had to watch Hillary mishandle classified info over decades and put some of their fellow agents at risk with no consequences, decided there was no way they were going to allow her to become President and risk anyone elses life. So they used the Cloaking program to hide the fact they leaked the info which sent the Dems on a wild goose chase blaming Russia for everything.

The Dems had to have someone to blame for Hillary's lose as they are not going to blame their own actions in cheating to get a completely unacceptable candidate nominated for POTUS. Russia is just the innocent bystander that everyone used to cover their own corruption. Assange said it was not Russia The US Intel said there is footprints of programs Russia once used, but we now know the CIA can cloak their programs. The US intel got a FISA warrant and the results of that warrant proved NO LINK BETWEEN RUSSIA AND TRUMP.

So when are the Dems going to realize they lost because of the corrupt candidate they cheated to nominate? The only investigations that the Congress should be looking at now is who is leaking info out of the government, endangering National Security. Stop the which Hunt to connect Trump to Russia as if Clapper had any proof he would have HAPPILY put it out. IF NSA had any evidence someone would have leaked it out just like they did with the fact Michael Flynn had a conversation with Russian Abm. The strainer I use to drain my noodles has less holes then DC's intel agencies and that is exactly how Obama wanted it to be once he left office. There is only one reason you spread raw collected data out over the whole government and that is to have it LEAKED and the leaker not found. He was corrupt and we are just starting to see the results of his corruption. If Hillary had been elected we may have never known the extent of his corruption and that is why Obama and Michelle were out campaigning for Hillary every chance they got. They were protecting themselves from anyone finding out the extents he went to save his legacy from a Trump win.
 
Top