• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Liberal "hell no" caucas

Whitewing

Well-known member
:lol: The new party of no..........donks. I'm sure the fatman will be running all over the internets whining about them. :D

The defeat of the Keystone XL pipeline in the Senate marked a major show of muscle for next year’s new hell-no caucus: liberals.

Liberal Senate Democrats united to block the controversial project, even though their imperiled Democratic colleague Mary Landrieu of Louisiana begged them not to at a Democratic Caucus lunch on Tuesday afternoon.

It was a remarkable move for a group that has stood behind Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) over the years, as he sought to protect vulnerable moderates, like Landrieu and some of her now-ousted colleagues, from taking tough votes on divisive environmental, health care and social issues.

But red-state Democrats like Mark Pryor of Arkansas and Mark Begich of Alaska are on their way out, and liberals like Jeff Merkley, Bernie Sanders and Sheldon Whitehouse — with Elizabeth Warren leading the way on messaging — may cause as many headaches for Senate Republicans as tea partyers caused Democrats in the past four years.

“I will use whatever tools I have as a senator to protect the environment,” said Merkley, a liberal from Oregon.

Asked if he could ever envision himself performing a Rand Paul-style talking filibuster in the Republican Senate, Whitehouse of Rhode Island replied: “Oh, of course. We will have more tools in the minority than we had in the majority.”

Progressives are girding for battle with Republicans over campaign finance law, consumer protections and women’s health care. But the early battle lines appear increasingly drawn around environmental policy, where Democratic centrists may defect from leadership in next year’s Senate and help Republicans pass legislation strongly opposed by liberal senators.

“They actually want to tear down environmental protection and regulation in every public comment that I’ve heard a Republican make. Clearly, there’s a challenge coming. And we have to be prepared to meet that challenge,” Whitehouse said. “With respect to climate, you can’t just go back and fix it and make it right with whoever was hurt by some stupid policy.”
 

mrj

Well-known member
What are the odds that all these crusading eco-freako's in office are using the government paid flights back home as often as possible, while decrying 'fossil fuels'???

Maybe we can begin to take them seriously when they begin to live in austere conditions themselves!

Realizing, of course, that many of them believe themselves superior to we commoners by reason of them being in the 'ruling class'.

mrj
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
mrj said:
What are the odds that all these crusading eco-freako's in office are using the government paid flights back home as often as possible, while decrying 'fossil fuels'???

Maybe we can begin to take them seriously when they begin to live in austere conditions themselves!

Realizing, of course, that many of them believe themselves superior to we commoners by reason of them being in the 'ruling class'.

mrj

The odds? It's been illustrated over and over again that they leave their 10,000 square foot homes, fly all over the world (burning fossil fuels) to attend climate conferences, stay in $2,000 a night luxury hotels, and then take a limo for that long two block drive to the conference. They then preach to the rest of us that we should reduce our carbon footprints.

I say shove a carbon footprint up their hypocritical asses.
 
Top