• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Marine Vet nails Brian Baird @ Townhall

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Town Hall Meeting with U.S. Congressman Brian Baird


starts with

"I'm a Disabled Marine Vet, and like you I took an Oath."

ends with

"when do you intend to uphold your Oath.

He also gives a little bit of a history lesson on Nazis

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rRE5UK6NQU

sign this guy up for 2010
 

MoGal

Well-known member
Here's another one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y98HxYbsdBM&NR=1


Maybe that is why Obama recently changed the military oath to upholding the president instead of the constitution???? I don't understand why people aren't up in arms over it because Hitler did the same thing.
 

MoGal

Well-known member
This is the same thing that Hilter did

THE NATIONAL LAW JOURNAL

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Military to Pledge Oath To Obama, Not Constitution

Secretary of Defense Robert Gates is extremely frustrated with orders
that the White House is contemplating. According to sources at the
Pentagon, including all branches of the armed forces, the Obama
Administration may break with a centuries-old tradition.

A spokesman for General James Cartwright, the Vice Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff, states that the Obama Administration
wants to have soldiers and officers pledge a loyalty oath
directly to the office of the President, and no longer to the Constitution.

"The oath to the Constitution is as old as the document itself." The
spokesman said, "At no time in American history, not even in the
Civil War, did the oath change or the subject of the oath differ. It
has always been to the Constitution."

The back-and-forth between the White House and the Defense Department
was expected as President George W. Bush left office. President Obama
has already signed orders to close Guantanamo and to pull combat
troops from Iraq But, this, say many at the Defense Department, goes too far.

"Technically, we can't talk about it before it becomes official policy."
the spokesman continued. "However, the Defense Department, including
the Secretary, will not take this laying down. Expect a fight from
the bureaucracy an the brass."

Sources at the White House had a different point of view. In a
circular distributed by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, the
rationale for the change was made more clear. "The President feels
that the military has been too indoctrinated by the old harbingers of
hate: nationalism, racism, and classism. By removing an oath to the
American society, the soldiers are less likely to commit atrocities
like those at Abu Ghraib."

"We expect a lot of flak over this," the classified memo continues.
"But those that would be most against it are those looking either for
attention or control." The time frame for the changes are unknown.
However, it is more likely that the changes will be made around the
July 4th holiday, in order to dampen any potential backlash. The
difference in the oath will actually only be slight. The main
differences will be the new phrasing. It is expected that the oath to
the Constitution will be entirely phased out within two years.

WHAT'S NEXT...IS HE GOING TO ASK THE ALLEGIANCE OF ALL AMERICAN
CITIZENS & SET HIMSELF UP AS GOD TO BE WORSHIPPED??? IF YOU'RE AS
OUTRAGED BY THIS AS I AM...PASS IT ON TO OTHERS AND CALL YOUR
REPRESENTATIVE. THIS SNEAKY FRAUD BEHIND CLOSED DOORS DESERVES TO BE
EXPOSED!

--------------------------------

I got this in an email.......... have just reposted just like I got it.
 
Top