A
Anonymous
Guest
MCCHRYSTALNACHT: CONDUCT
UNBECOMING … OF A PRESIDENT
OBAMA, ALONG WITH SYCOPHANTS IN BOTH THE DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN PARTIES, HAVE CONDUCTED A MCCHRYSTALNACHT, A PUBLIC CHARACTER ASSASINATION OF GENERAL STANLEY MCCHRYSTAL. IN TERMS OF OBAMA’S ROLE IN THIS CIVILIAN COUP, IT CONSTITUTES CONDUCT UNBECOMING OF A PRESIDENT. NOW, CONDUCT UNBECOMING AN OFFICER AND A GENTLEMAN IS AN OFFENSE OUTLINED BY ARTICLE 133 OF THE UNITED STATES UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE. ARTICLE 133 STATES THAT THE KIND OF BEHAVIOR DEFINED AS “UNBECOMING” IS “ACTION OR BEHAVIOR IN AN OFFICIAL CAPACITY WHICH, IN DISHONORING OR DISGRACING THE PERSON AS AN OFFICER, SERIOUSLY COMPROMISES THE OFFICER’S CHARACTER AS A GENTLEMAN.” ARTICLE 133 THEN LISTS THE ATTRIBUTES WHICH CONSTITUTE “CONDUCT UNBECOMING. THEY ARE “… ACTS OF DISHONESTY, UNFAIR DEALING, INDECENCY, INDECORUM, LAWLESSNESS, INJUSTICE, OR CRUELTY.” ANYONE FOUND GUILTY OF THESE ACTS OR OMISSIONS ARE SUBJECT TO COURT MARTIAL DEFINED IN THE PUNITIVE CODE. NOW, THERE ARE SOME OF YOU WHO MIGHT SAY THAT OBAMA ISN’T IN THE MILITARY, AND SO SHOULDN’T BE SUBJECT TO THESE RULES. BUT YOU WOULD BE WRONG. THE ENTIRE LEFT-WING MEDIA HAS BEEN GLOATING OVER THE FACT THAT OBAMA IS THE COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF OF THE ARMED FORCES EVER SINCE HE CALLED MCCHRYSTAL BACK TO WASHINGTON. SO HE’S NOT ONLY IN THE MILITARY, HE’S THE HEAD OF THE MILITARY AND THEREFORE SUBJECT TO ITS LAWS. REMEMBER, CONDUCT UNBECOMING AN OFFICER AND A GENTLEMAN IS DEFINED BY:
1. ACTS OF DISHONESTY – OBAMA HAS BEEN DISHONEST ABOUT WHY HE GOT RID OF MCCHRYSTAL. IT’S CLEAR THAT THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH MCCHRYSTAL BEING INSUBORDINATE AND EVERYTHING TO DO WITH OBAMA BEING INTIMIDATED.
2. UNFAIR DEALING – OBAMA DEALT WITH MCCHRYSTAL UNFAIRLY. HE HAD DECIDED HE WAS GOING TO FIRE MCCHRYSTAL EVEN BEFORE HE GAVE MCCHRYSTAL AN OPPORTUNITY TO DEFEND HIMSELF. ACCORDING TO NEWS REPORTS, MCCHRYSTAL OFFERED HIS RESIGNATION AT THE BEGINNING OF THEIR MEETING AT THE WHITE HOUSE. OBAMA IMMEDIATELY ACCEPTED. HE DIDN’T BOTHER TO ASK FOR AN EXPLANATION. THAT’S THE DEFINITION OF “UNFAIR DEALING.”
3. INDECENCY – OBAMA HAS HAD THE INDECENCY TO SHACKLE OUR TROOPS WITH RULES OF ENGAGEMENT THAT WILL PREVENT THEM FROM EVER WINNING IN AFGHANISTAN.
4. INDECORUM – OBAMA’S INDECOROUS AND IMPERIOUS REMOVAL OF MCCHRYSTAL EMARASSES AND UNDERMINES THE COMMAND STRUCTURE OF THE MILITARY.
5. LAWLESSNESS – OBAMA HAS DISPLAYED HIS LAWLESSNESS ON HEALTHCARE, ON THE BAILOUTS, AND IN NUMEROUS OTHER AREAS. BUT HIS VIOLATIONS OF THE MILITARY COMMAND STRUCTURE AND HIS EXTRA-LEGAL CONDUCT IN DICTATING OVER THE MILITARY ARE PERHAPS THE MOST DANGEROUS LAWLESSNESS OF ALL.
6. INJUSTICE – OBAMA’S REFUSAL TO EVEN GIVE MCCHRYSTAL A FAIR HEARING IS THE HEIGHT OF INJUSTICE
7. CRUELTY – OBAMA HAS CRUELLY LEFT OUR ARMY IN AFGHANISTAN WITHOUT A REAL COMMANDER WHO HAS REAL COMBAT EXPERIENCE.
ON EVERY COUNT, HE DEMONSTRATES CONDUCT UNBECOMING OF A PRESIDENT.
NOW, REMEMBER, OBAMA ISN’T THE ONLY ONE COMPLICIT IN THIS MCCHRYSTALNACHT. ALL THE TRAITORS IN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY THAT I’VE TOLD YOU ABOUT FOR YEARS WERE IN ON THIS, TOO. SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM DEFENDED OBAMA’S DECISION AND SAID THAT AS MEMBERS OF THE MILITARY, WE HAVE TO KEEP OUR OPINIONS TO OURSELVES. AND WHY DID HE SAY WE? AND WHY DID LINDSEY GRAHAM SAY WE? BECAUSE AS A RESERVIST IN THE MILITARY, LINDSEY GRAHAM SERVES AS A LAWYER TELLING TROOPS GOING OVERSEAS HOW THEY HAVE TO BE CAREFUL NOT TO FIRE BACK IF THEY’RE ATTACKED FROM A MOSQUE. AND THEN THERE’S JOHN MCSHAME. JOHN MCSHAME WHO LIVES UP TO HIS NAME. JOHN MCSHAME SHAMED HIMSELF AGAIN BY APPLAUDING OBAMA’S DECISION LIKE THE WEAK OLD MAN THAT HE IS. AND THEN THERE WAS DEFENSE SECRETARY ROBERT GATES, A REPUBLICAN, WHO ALSO SUPPORTED OBAMA’S DECISION. REMEMBER, THIS IS THE MAN WHO WHEN ASKED IF THE FT. HOOD MASSACRE CONDUCTED BY THE MUSLIM MAJOR HASSAN WAS AN ACT OF TERROR SAID, “I’M NOT EVEN GOING TO GO THERE.” IT JUST GOES TO SHOW YOU THAT THIS ISN’T SO MUCH THE NIGHT OF THE LONG KNIVES AS IT IS THE NIGHT OF THE SMALL KNAVES.
AND WHAT ABOUT THE DESK GENERALS AND DESK ADMIRALS LIKE MIKE MULLEN? MULLEN CAME OUT TODAY AND SAID THAT HE COULDN’T EXCUSE MCCHRYSTAL’S LACK OF JUDGEMENT. MULLEN IS A DESK ADMIRAL. AS FAR AS I CAN DISCOVER, HE’S NEVER BEEN IN COMBAT. HE ATTENDED HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL. HIS FATHER WAS A HOLLYWOOD PRESS AGENT AND HIS MOTHER WAS AN ASSISTANT TO JIMMY DURANTE. WHEN WE’RE TRUSTING OUR TOP LEVEL MILITARY DECISIONS TO DESK GENERALS LIKE PETRAEUS AND DESK ADMIRALS LIKE MULLEN, WE KNOW WE’RE REALLY IN TROUBLE.
AND LET’S NOT FORGET THE ROLE OF THE MEDIA IN ALL THIS. YOU HEARD THE WAY ANDY MITCHELL AND SOFTBALL AND WOLFIE BLITZER TREATED MCCHRYSTAL, STICKING IN THEIR KNIVES AS THE GENERAL FELL. THEY INSTINCTIVELY FEAR THE MILITARY. BECAUSE OF THEIR YEARS SMOKING BONGS AT ANTI-WAR PROTESTS IN COLLEGE, THE IMAGE THEY HAVE OF ANY REAL MILITARY MAN IS OF GENERAL PINOCHET DISAPPEARING PEOPLE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT. THE SAME THING IS TRUE OF THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION. THE BONG-SMOKERS IN THE MEDIA AND THE BONG-SMOKERS IN THE WHITE HOUSE ARE DEEPLY UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THE MILITARY BECAUSE DEEP DOWN, THEY KNOW THAT THEY, THE BONG-SMOKERS, ARE GUILTY OF SEDITION.
MCCHRYSTALNACHT HAS LEFT OUR TROOPS IN AFGHANISTAN WITHOUT A REAL LEADER. AND THIS COMBINED WITH THE FACT THAT THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT PREVENT OUR MILITARY FROM KILLING THE ENEMY IS A RECIPE FOR DISASTER. THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT USED TO BE, “DON’T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THEIR EYES.” BUT UNDER CLINTON, AND GIVEN THE RECENT NEWS ABOUT AL GORE, IT SEEMS AS IF THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT HAVE BECOME, “DON’T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THEIR THIGHS.”
UNBECOMING … OF A PRESIDENT
OBAMA, ALONG WITH SYCOPHANTS IN BOTH THE DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN PARTIES, HAVE CONDUCTED A MCCHRYSTALNACHT, A PUBLIC CHARACTER ASSASINATION OF GENERAL STANLEY MCCHRYSTAL. IN TERMS OF OBAMA’S ROLE IN THIS CIVILIAN COUP, IT CONSTITUTES CONDUCT UNBECOMING OF A PRESIDENT. NOW, CONDUCT UNBECOMING AN OFFICER AND A GENTLEMAN IS AN OFFENSE OUTLINED BY ARTICLE 133 OF THE UNITED STATES UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE. ARTICLE 133 STATES THAT THE KIND OF BEHAVIOR DEFINED AS “UNBECOMING” IS “ACTION OR BEHAVIOR IN AN OFFICIAL CAPACITY WHICH, IN DISHONORING OR DISGRACING THE PERSON AS AN OFFICER, SERIOUSLY COMPROMISES THE OFFICER’S CHARACTER AS A GENTLEMAN.” ARTICLE 133 THEN LISTS THE ATTRIBUTES WHICH CONSTITUTE “CONDUCT UNBECOMING. THEY ARE “… ACTS OF DISHONESTY, UNFAIR DEALING, INDECENCY, INDECORUM, LAWLESSNESS, INJUSTICE, OR CRUELTY.” ANYONE FOUND GUILTY OF THESE ACTS OR OMISSIONS ARE SUBJECT TO COURT MARTIAL DEFINED IN THE PUNITIVE CODE. NOW, THERE ARE SOME OF YOU WHO MIGHT SAY THAT OBAMA ISN’T IN THE MILITARY, AND SO SHOULDN’T BE SUBJECT TO THESE RULES. BUT YOU WOULD BE WRONG. THE ENTIRE LEFT-WING MEDIA HAS BEEN GLOATING OVER THE FACT THAT OBAMA IS THE COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF OF THE ARMED FORCES EVER SINCE HE CALLED MCCHRYSTAL BACK TO WASHINGTON. SO HE’S NOT ONLY IN THE MILITARY, HE’S THE HEAD OF THE MILITARY AND THEREFORE SUBJECT TO ITS LAWS. REMEMBER, CONDUCT UNBECOMING AN OFFICER AND A GENTLEMAN IS DEFINED BY:
1. ACTS OF DISHONESTY – OBAMA HAS BEEN DISHONEST ABOUT WHY HE GOT RID OF MCCHRYSTAL. IT’S CLEAR THAT THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH MCCHRYSTAL BEING INSUBORDINATE AND EVERYTHING TO DO WITH OBAMA BEING INTIMIDATED.
2. UNFAIR DEALING – OBAMA DEALT WITH MCCHRYSTAL UNFAIRLY. HE HAD DECIDED HE WAS GOING TO FIRE MCCHRYSTAL EVEN BEFORE HE GAVE MCCHRYSTAL AN OPPORTUNITY TO DEFEND HIMSELF. ACCORDING TO NEWS REPORTS, MCCHRYSTAL OFFERED HIS RESIGNATION AT THE BEGINNING OF THEIR MEETING AT THE WHITE HOUSE. OBAMA IMMEDIATELY ACCEPTED. HE DIDN’T BOTHER TO ASK FOR AN EXPLANATION. THAT’S THE DEFINITION OF “UNFAIR DEALING.”
3. INDECENCY – OBAMA HAS HAD THE INDECENCY TO SHACKLE OUR TROOPS WITH RULES OF ENGAGEMENT THAT WILL PREVENT THEM FROM EVER WINNING IN AFGHANISTAN.
4. INDECORUM – OBAMA’S INDECOROUS AND IMPERIOUS REMOVAL OF MCCHRYSTAL EMARASSES AND UNDERMINES THE COMMAND STRUCTURE OF THE MILITARY.
5. LAWLESSNESS – OBAMA HAS DISPLAYED HIS LAWLESSNESS ON HEALTHCARE, ON THE BAILOUTS, AND IN NUMEROUS OTHER AREAS. BUT HIS VIOLATIONS OF THE MILITARY COMMAND STRUCTURE AND HIS EXTRA-LEGAL CONDUCT IN DICTATING OVER THE MILITARY ARE PERHAPS THE MOST DANGEROUS LAWLESSNESS OF ALL.
6. INJUSTICE – OBAMA’S REFUSAL TO EVEN GIVE MCCHRYSTAL A FAIR HEARING IS THE HEIGHT OF INJUSTICE
7. CRUELTY – OBAMA HAS CRUELLY LEFT OUR ARMY IN AFGHANISTAN WITHOUT A REAL COMMANDER WHO HAS REAL COMBAT EXPERIENCE.
ON EVERY COUNT, HE DEMONSTRATES CONDUCT UNBECOMING OF A PRESIDENT.
NOW, REMEMBER, OBAMA ISN’T THE ONLY ONE COMPLICIT IN THIS MCCHRYSTALNACHT. ALL THE TRAITORS IN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY THAT I’VE TOLD YOU ABOUT FOR YEARS WERE IN ON THIS, TOO. SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM DEFENDED OBAMA’S DECISION AND SAID THAT AS MEMBERS OF THE MILITARY, WE HAVE TO KEEP OUR OPINIONS TO OURSELVES. AND WHY DID HE SAY WE? AND WHY DID LINDSEY GRAHAM SAY WE? BECAUSE AS A RESERVIST IN THE MILITARY, LINDSEY GRAHAM SERVES AS A LAWYER TELLING TROOPS GOING OVERSEAS HOW THEY HAVE TO BE CAREFUL NOT TO FIRE BACK IF THEY’RE ATTACKED FROM A MOSQUE. AND THEN THERE’S JOHN MCSHAME. JOHN MCSHAME WHO LIVES UP TO HIS NAME. JOHN MCSHAME SHAMED HIMSELF AGAIN BY APPLAUDING OBAMA’S DECISION LIKE THE WEAK OLD MAN THAT HE IS. AND THEN THERE WAS DEFENSE SECRETARY ROBERT GATES, A REPUBLICAN, WHO ALSO SUPPORTED OBAMA’S DECISION. REMEMBER, THIS IS THE MAN WHO WHEN ASKED IF THE FT. HOOD MASSACRE CONDUCTED BY THE MUSLIM MAJOR HASSAN WAS AN ACT OF TERROR SAID, “I’M NOT EVEN GOING TO GO THERE.” IT JUST GOES TO SHOW YOU THAT THIS ISN’T SO MUCH THE NIGHT OF THE LONG KNIVES AS IT IS THE NIGHT OF THE SMALL KNAVES.
AND WHAT ABOUT THE DESK GENERALS AND DESK ADMIRALS LIKE MIKE MULLEN? MULLEN CAME OUT TODAY AND SAID THAT HE COULDN’T EXCUSE MCCHRYSTAL’S LACK OF JUDGEMENT. MULLEN IS A DESK ADMIRAL. AS FAR AS I CAN DISCOVER, HE’S NEVER BEEN IN COMBAT. HE ATTENDED HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL. HIS FATHER WAS A HOLLYWOOD PRESS AGENT AND HIS MOTHER WAS AN ASSISTANT TO JIMMY DURANTE. WHEN WE’RE TRUSTING OUR TOP LEVEL MILITARY DECISIONS TO DESK GENERALS LIKE PETRAEUS AND DESK ADMIRALS LIKE MULLEN, WE KNOW WE’RE REALLY IN TROUBLE.
AND LET’S NOT FORGET THE ROLE OF THE MEDIA IN ALL THIS. YOU HEARD THE WAY ANDY MITCHELL AND SOFTBALL AND WOLFIE BLITZER TREATED MCCHRYSTAL, STICKING IN THEIR KNIVES AS THE GENERAL FELL. THEY INSTINCTIVELY FEAR THE MILITARY. BECAUSE OF THEIR YEARS SMOKING BONGS AT ANTI-WAR PROTESTS IN COLLEGE, THE IMAGE THEY HAVE OF ANY REAL MILITARY MAN IS OF GENERAL PINOCHET DISAPPEARING PEOPLE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT. THE SAME THING IS TRUE OF THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION. THE BONG-SMOKERS IN THE MEDIA AND THE BONG-SMOKERS IN THE WHITE HOUSE ARE DEEPLY UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THE MILITARY BECAUSE DEEP DOWN, THEY KNOW THAT THEY, THE BONG-SMOKERS, ARE GUILTY OF SEDITION.
MCCHRYSTALNACHT HAS LEFT OUR TROOPS IN AFGHANISTAN WITHOUT A REAL LEADER. AND THIS COMBINED WITH THE FACT THAT THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT PREVENT OUR MILITARY FROM KILLING THE ENEMY IS A RECIPE FOR DISASTER. THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT USED TO BE, “DON’T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THEIR EYES.” BUT UNDER CLINTON, AND GIVEN THE RECENT NEWS ABOUT AL GORE, IT SEEMS AS IF THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT HAVE BECOME, “DON’T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THEIR THIGHS.”