• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

McSame????

Cal

Well-known member
From Neal Boortz:

Barack Obama says that John McCain and Sarah Palin are lying about their records when dubbing themselves as the "original mavericks" who would stand up for hard-pressed voters.

Fine, Obama, you want to back that up?

Let's start with John McCain, who has a 100% approval rating on pork-barrel spending for the 2007 legislative season, according to Citizens against government waste. His lifetime score is 88%. What this basically means is that in 2007, John McCain voted with the taxpayers 100% of the time. This means that over his years in the Senate, John McCain voted with the taxpayers 88 out of every 100 votes. And when I say "with the taxpayers" I essentially mean he voted in a way that would allow taxpayers to keep their money, rather than spend it on frivolous government pork projects.

Just in case you weren't aware, Mr. Obama ... you scored a 10% rating in 2007 and an 18% lifetime rating. Oh and your running mate, Joe Biden, he actually managed to score a 0% rating in 2007. These really seem like a pair of guys that are trying to create change in Washington. These really look like the people who are looking out for you, the taxpayers.



http://councilfor.cagw.org/site/DocServer/2007_Senate_Ratings_Final.pdf?docID=3242
 

aplusmnt

Well-known member
If stuff like this would ever get out through the Main stream media it would not even be a race at all, McCain would win 90% of electoral votes.
 

Denny

Well-known member
aplusmnt said:
If stuff like this would ever get out through the Main stream media it would not even be a race at all, McCain would win 90% of electoral votes.

He's going to anyhow.
 

Steve

Well-known member
Obama/Biden change your money from your pocket to thiers...

After Obama/Biden finished, the only change left for them would be to figure out how to tax your pocket change..
 

mjdtexan

Member
backhoeboogie said:
The lib media won't tell it like it is.

Unfortunetly (sp?) thats the truth. To be fair, Fox does the same thing on the Conservative side. It goes back to what I have been saying about wanting some unbiased news media. I really think that there is an oppurtunity to make a profit with a 24 hour unbiased news media. Us Conservative citizens and those liberal citizens are basicly (sp?) all patriotic people. A lot of us would watch a channel like that to get an honest view of our candidates. We could make more informed decisions. One problem for us Conservative people is that there is only one channel that leans our way. The libs have all of the rest and thats what most people watch. The media realizes that they have the power to shape peoples minds. An example is President Bush's approval rating. The media has done nothing but beat him up for the past 8 years. Not one positive story about the positive he has done for our country. And there are positve things to talk about. One such story is the fact that we have not been attacked again since September 11th 2001. Thats not an accident folks. Yes, this is the anniversary. You barely even hear the media bringing that up today. Dont get me wrong, I have been disappointed in our current President. I for one wished he would have picked up that darn veto pen a WHOLE lot more. His approval rate is very low and we hear about it every day. Congress and the Senate approval rate is low and we barely hear anything about it. No supprise, both are currently controlled by the left.

I want to hear the negatives and the positives about both sides on a regular basis. Its to bad that both of our parties have been hijacked by special interest groups. Both sides have their beliefs. Thats fine. Thats good actually. I just want fairness. I am gonna start holding my breath in hope. Starting right now. :shock:

Wait, before I start holding my breath, let me apologise about my spelling. Ok, holding breath ----------------now :shock:
 

Yanuck

Well-known member
mjdtexan said:
backhoeboogie said:
The lib media won't tell it like it is.

Unfortunetly (sp?) thats the truth. To be fair, Fox does the same thing on the Conservative side. It goes back to what I have been saying about wanting some unbiased news media. I really think that there is an oppurtunity to make a profit with a 24 hour unbiased news media. Us Conservatives citizens and those liberal citizens are basicly (sp?) all patriotic people. A lot of us would watch a channel like that to get an honest view of our candidates. We could make more informed decisions. One problem for us Conservative people is that there is only one channel that leans our way. The libs have all of the rest and thats what most people watch. The media realizes that they have the power to shape peoples minds. An example is President Bush's approval rating. The media has done nothing but beat him up for the past 8 years. Not one positive story about the positive he has done for our country. And there are positve things to talk about. One such story is the fact that we have not been attacked again since September 11th 2001. Yes, this is the anniversary. You barely even hear the media bringing that up today. Dont get me wrong, I have been disappointed in our current President. I for one wished he would have picked up that darn veto pen a WHOLE lot more. His approval rate is very low and we hear about it every day. Congress and the Senate approval rate is low and we barely hear anything about it. No supprise, both are currently controlled by the left.

I want to hear the negatives and the positives about both sides on a regular basis. Its to bad that both of our parties have been hijacked by special interest groups. Both sides have their beliefs. Thats fine. Thats good actually. I just want fairness. I am gonna start holding my breath in hope. Starting right now. :shock:

Wait, before I start holding my breath, let me apologise about my spelling. Ok, holding breath ----------------now :shock:

what shade of purple are you now???!!!! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 

Cal

Well-known member
Nothing from Oldtimer. I wonder if he likes all of those earmarks? Looks like Obama and Obiden really suck when it comes to keeping the best interest of the taxpayers in mind.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Cal said:
Nothing from Oldtimer. I wonder if he likes all of those earmarks? Looks like Obama and Obiden really suck when it comes to keeping the best interest of the taxpayers in mind.

I posted it on the other thread....
 

mjdtexan

Member
Cal said:
Nothing from Oldtimer. I wonder if he likes all of those earmarks? Looks like Obama and Obiden

Yall really make me laugh with all of the different names that yall come up with for our candidates. I swear I have laughed out loud several times.

Gotta go for now. I need to watch the news. Looks like IKE is tracking to go right over the top of my house. Good news is it looks like it is going to be a cat 2 hurricane instead of the cat 3 that was predicted.
 

hopalong

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Cal said:
Nothing from Oldtimer. I wonder if he likes all of those earmarks? Looks like Obama and Obiden really suck when it comes to keeping the best interest of the taxpayers in mind.

I posted it on the other thread....

Never stopped you from, posting in different threads before, must not be to proud of or ssure of you knowwledge again because that is what you usually do when backed into a corner. Run away.
Maybe that is why you only served one term of sheriff, you ran away from the speeders so you wouldn't have to face them!
 
Top