Michelle: Dessert is Not a Right. It's a Privilege, Which Means Not for You, Peasant
By Teri O'Brien
(AXcess News) Chicago - Yesterday, the boiling cauldron of race-based rage that is Michelle Obama addressed the NAACP. In addition to the inevitable blather about "food deserts," she explained that unlike health care, dessert is not a right. So to summarize:
Michelle Obama deplores racism as she addresses an organization that relies on continued racism for its very existence.
Michelle Obama is having the time of her life as one of the first lucky beneficiaries of long overdue reparations for slavery, while lamenting the existence of slavery In the 19th century.
Michelle Obama, and her husband, President Sham WOW (Walks on Water), who abhor slavery, enthusiastically embrace and try to ensure the enslavement of health care providers and future generations who must foot the bill for creating their Euro-style utopia. You have a right to force a doctor to provide you his services, but, interestingly, not pie. Could this be another broken Obama promise?
After its latest insufferably predictable discovery of yet another hotbed of white racism, this time in the Tea Party movement, I would say that the NAACP had lost all of its credibility, but that would be like saying that Miley Cyrus has lost her credibility as a gifted singer. I could be charitable and say that at one time it had a shred of intellectual integrity, objectivity, and even gravitas, which it demonstrated in its pursuit of socially-beneficial goals like the end of racism, the promotion of equal opportunity, if not outcome, and education about the importance of the rule of law, and that now It has degenerated into typical "non-partisan" (read radical leftwing) "civil rights" interest group, reciting the party line and flacking for its whole hackneyed agenda, including income redistribution, gun grabbing, and "right to choose," as in choosing to kill an unborn child, but not to choose a school in which the students are actually required to learn to read, and to do basic math, rather than receiving endless indoctrination about the evil sins of racist, imperialistic Amerika. I could say that, but it wouldn't really be true. If the NAACP ever was about equal treatment for black people, it lost its commitment to that idea a long time ago. Just ask Clarence Thomas, or one of my favorite legal scholars, Judge Janice Rogers Brown, who understands that socialism is the new slavery. No, the NAACP's agenda was never about eradicating racism. It was started by socialists who believed that promoting a sense of grievance and entitlement in black people was key to installing the Left in power. Think Saul Alinsky. The strategy involved not only "raising the consciousness" of the persecuted racial minorities about their victimhood, but also encouraging a sense of endless guilt in white people that could never be assuaged because it resulted from actions that happened hundreds of years before they were born. The NAACP wants to eradicate racism like Mickey D's wants to ban eating burgers. They make their living from stoking the flames of race division. Please, Libs, don't distort what I’m saying here. (I know that they will in any case, but I gave it a shot.) Am I denying the existence of racism in America in the form of succession, slavery, and segregation, as practiced largely by the Democrat party? Of course not. Just to prove my good faith, please put me down for a substantial contribution to any person of any race who I have personally forced to pick any of my cotton.
Not to get side-tracked here, but I must say that, God, I have missed the dinomedia's endless lamentations about the lack of that gravitas thing since that imbecile George W. Bush left office in favor of the gravitas-oozing COO (Current Occupant of the Oval Office), haven't you? But I digress.
People may have at one time believed that the NAACP was legit, and I concede some still do, but the reality was and is very different from the PR. I wonder if this sort of unmasking is what happened to Mel Gibson. Up until recently, at least outwardly, he was the "Passion of the Christ" guy, the "Braveheart" guy, the devoutly Catholic, happily-married father of seven children. Next thing you know, he's divorced, shacking up with and fathering a child out of wedlock with some Russian bimbo, allegedly knocking out her teeth and threatening to burn her house down. I mean is this Mel Gibson or O.J. Simpson after attending the Rahm Emanuel school of elocution? Or were we simply deceived about who Mel Gibson really was all along? I don't know, but fortunately for Mel, I'm sure that his "white privilege" will ensure that, unlike O.J., he isn't subjected to ridiculously harsh punishment for domestic abuse. Oh wait ...
After Michelle's inspiring speech, she did a drop in on some of those yahoo crackers in the Gulf, and urged others to take their vacations there, right before jetting off on another vacation with her family to Maine. It's exhausting to destroy America! While having to endure those rubes and feign concern about their silly problems, at least she got to enjoy a yummy ice cream treat at the Pink Pelican Ice Cream Bar. No, dessert is not a right. It's a privilege, and rank has its privileges. I can't think of anyone more rank than Michelle and the narcissistic, dangerous empty suit she’s married to.
Note: Teri O'Brien is an author, speaker, recovering (non-practicing) attorney, and dangerous thinker who puts the RED in Republican. Host of the popular "The Teri O'Brien Show", Teri can be heard on Blog Talk Radio every Sunday 2-3:30 p.m. Central time. You can contact her at http://www.teriobrien.com