• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Michigan recount over

Tam

Well-known member
State judge said Stein didn't have any standing as the election would not make her the winner in any way or chance and the federal judge is abiding by the State judge and calling off his earlier ruling. The Election Commission voted to stop the recount as soon as the Fed. Judge's ruling came down so Hillary LOST. :clap: :clap: :clap: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Michigan's presidential recount was halted Wednesday after three days, assuring Republican Donald Trump's victory in the state, when a federal judge said he'll abide by a court ruling that found the Green Party candidate Jill Stein couldn't seek another look at the vote.
 

Tam

Well-known member
Trump is doing as expected in the recount in Wisconsin after 70% of votes counted he is still leading by over 22,000 so not likely that state is going to change. Michigan stopped their recount as she had no standing in that state to even request the recount due to her bad campaign results. So it will be interesting to see if the Federal judge in Pennsylvania looks at the other two states on Stein's hit list and decides to stop the lunatic in her tracks and stop the waste of tax payers money.

ALTHOUGH I would have loved to known why so many precincts in liberal left Detroit had poll books not jiving with the ballot counts.
Were the libs stuffing the ballot boxes not think anyone would be checking? :?
 

Steve

Well-known member
Those candidates now pay $125 per precinct, which is Stein’s case is nearly $1 million. Republican Secretary of State Ruth Johnson has said the recount may cost $5 million.

Stein failed to show she was an aggrieved candidate as defined by state law and entitled to a recount, the judge said. He concluded Stein’s request to test the election system’s vulnerability to fraud lacked evidence. “But invoking a court’s aid to remedy that problem in the manner plaintiffs have chosen — seeking a recount as an audit of the election to test whether the vulnerability led to actual compromise of the voting system — has never been endorsed by any court, and would require, at a minimum, evidence of significant fraud or mistake — and not speculative fear of them. Such evidence has not been presented here.”

sadly this also plays into her hands, she is a liberal martyr now, one with millions stashed. I doubt she will pay fro the court costs and the cost already incurred from her demand to do the recount.

Liberals, forcing Americans to pay for their ideals since the 1890's
 

Latest posts

Top