• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Mittster to ReRide??!! YEE-HAW!!!

littlejoe

Well-known member
In a stunning and sensational development that had political correspondents from Maine to Chesapeake Bay abandoning their families on the beach and rummaging through their luggage for their laptops, Mitt Romney told Hugh Hewitt, the conservative radio host, that he might yet be persuaded to run for President again in 2016. After echoing previous statements that he’s already decided not to be a candidate, Romney appeared to equivocate, saying, “circumstances can change, but I’m not going to let my head go there.”

“Come on,” I hear you say, between splutters, “it can’t be true.” Romney in 2016? The star-crossed one-per-center, who crashed out of the 2008 campaign after Super Tuesday and got so badly kicked around in 2012 that he ended up, courtesy of a soft-soap Netflix documentary, as someone to be pitied rather than loathed and feared? The robotic, private-equity tycoon and former Governor of Massachusetts, who has a car elevator in his garage and a silver foot in his mouth?



Yes, that’s the guy. The Mittster, to you and me.

For weeks now, political journalists desperate for something more exciting to write about than midterm primary races in Florida and Arizona have been whipping up speculation about Romney staging a Nixon-style resurrection, blithely ignoring the fact that he has repeatedly said that he isn’t interested in subjecting himself, yet again, to the mercies of Republican primary voters, Democratic dirt diggers, and media tormentors. Back in January, when the possibility of another run was put to him by Ashley Parker, of the Times, Romney replied, “Oh, no, no, no. No, no, no, no, no. No, no, no.”

Because political operatives and journalists are skeptical types, such vociferous denials only piqued their interest. They happened to coincide with President Obama’s approval ratings hitting new lows and Romney emerging from his post-2012 purdah. Earlier this year, he started to endorse G.O.P. candidates in this year’s midterms and raised money for some of them. In June, he held a private summit for G.O.P. donors and politicians in Park City, Utah, where one of his five homes is located. According to a report from the Washington Post’s Philip Rucker, the event “quickly became a Romney revival. Minutes after the 2012 Republican presidential nominee welcomed his 300 guests, Joe Scarborough, the MSNBC host and former GOP congressman, urged them to begin a ‘Draft Romney’ movement in 2016.” Rucker reported that Romney even got some encouragement from a Democratic attendee, Brian Schweitzer, the former Governor of Montana, who said, “He would be a giant in a field of midgets.”

With that Post story, the Romney balloon was airborne. This past Sunday, appearing on CBS’s “Face the Nation,” Paul Ryan, Romney’s running mate in 2012, pumped a bit more air into it, saying, “I sure wish he would” run in 2016. “I think he’d make a phenomenal President. He has the intellect, the honor, the character, and the temperament to be a fantastic President.”

Scarborough, Ryan, and Schweitzer. With the endorsement of a focus group like that, who wouldn’t be tempted to reconsider his options?

Sadly—and here I am speaking as a thrill-seeking journalist rather than as a citizen—the answer is it’s likely that Willard Mitt Romney, a man who, for all his weaknesses as a Presidential candidate, knows a losing investment proposition when he sees one. If you examine the entirety of his interview with Hewitt rather than the headlines it generated, you get a rather different picture of his thinking. Here’s some of the exchange:


Hewitt: If you personally believed, I mean really, genuinely believed, that you were the only candidate who could beat Hillary, and that belief was confirmed by your family, your friends, and your respected political advisers, would you not then feel obliged to run?

Romney: Ha, ha. Well, Hugh, the reason I came to the conclusion I did, which is this is not the right time for me to run, is because of my belief that someone else stands a better chance of winning than I do. Had that not been the case, had I believed that I would be best positioned to beat Hillary Clinton, then I would be running. I actually believe that someone new that is not defined yet, someone who perhaps is from the next generation, will be able to catch fire, potentially build a movement, and be able to beat Hillary Clinton. … I think we’ve got a number of very good people looking at this race. I’m expecting someone to be able to catch fire and get the job done.

Hewitt pressed on, unabashed. It was he, not Romney, who first used the line “circumstances can change.” Romney agreed that they could, but rather than seizing upon this possibility he virtually dismissed it. Citing a scene from “Dumb and Dumber,” the 1994 Jim Carey flick, in which the comedian celebrates after being told that he has but the tiniest chance of winning over Lauren Holly, Romney said that there was a “one out of a million” chance that he might end up running. He even explained what he meant. “Let’s say all the guys that were running all came together and said, ‘Hey, we’ve all decided we can’t do it. You must do it.’ Ha, ha, ha. That’s the one out of a million we’re thinking about.”

Was that a not too subtle endorsement for a “draft Romney” campaign? Or was it a bow to reality from a sixty-seven-year-old, twice-defeated Presidential candidate who knows that his chance has come and gone? The latter, surely. But, hey, we can all dream.
 

loomixguy

Well-known member
Mitt is a credit to what we have now. He called it spot on about Russia, while your & OT's boy pooh-poohed the statement. He was right about a lot of other things as well. We know where he was born, what passport(s) he's traveled under, where he went to college and what his transcripts say, his actual sexual orientation, and unequivocally what faith he is. He might not be the perfect candidate, but if he received the nomination, I'd have zero problems voting for him.
 

littlejoe

Well-known member
loomixguy said:
Mitt is a credit to what we have now. He called it spot on about Russia, while your & OT's boy pooh-poohed the statement. He was right about a lot of other things as well. We know where he was born, what passport(s) he's traveled under, where he went to college and what his transcripts say, his actual sexual orientation, and unequivocally what faith he is. He might not be the perfect candidate, but if he received the nomination, I'd have zero problems voting for him.

why would you say --I guess Obama?---is my 'boy'? he ain't, he's a dope. I've always said that.
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
LJ, if I ask you a serious question, could you attempt to answer it?

Since it appears your post is mocking a potential run by Mitt Romney in 2016, could you explain to us here what it is about the man that you dislike, or perhaps more to the point, how it is you view him in lesser terms than Barack Obama?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
littlejoe said:
In a stunning and sensational development that had political correspondents from Maine to Chesapeake Bay abandoning their families on the beach and rummaging through their luggage for their laptops, Mitt Romney told Hugh Hewitt, the conservative radio host, that he might yet be persuaded to run for President again in 2016. After echoing previous statements that he’s already decided not to be a candidate, Romney appeared to equivocate, saying, “circumstances can change, but I’m not going to let my head go there.”

“Come on,” I hear you say, between splutters, “it can’t be true.” Romney in 2016? The star-crossed one-per-center, who crashed out of the 2008 campaign after Super Tuesday and got so badly kicked around in 2012 that he ended up, courtesy of a soft-soap Netflix documentary, as someone to be pitied rather than loathed and feared? The robotic, private-equity tycoon and former Governor of Massachusetts, who has a car elevator in his garage and a silver foot in his mouth?



Yes, that’s the guy. The Mittster, to you and me.

For weeks now, political journalists desperate for something more exciting to write about than midterm primary races in Florida and Arizona have been whipping up speculation about Romney staging a Nixon-style resurrection, blithely ignoring the fact that he has repeatedly said that he isn’t interested in subjecting himself, yet again, to the mercies of Republican primary voters, Democratic dirt diggers, and media tormentors. Back in January, when the possibility of another run was put to him by Ashley Parker, of the Times, Romney replied, “Oh, no, no, no. No, no, no, no, no. No, no, no.”

Because political operatives and journalists are skeptical types, such vociferous denials only piqued their interest. They happened to coincide with President Obama’s approval ratings hitting new lows and Romney emerging from his post-2012 purdah. Earlier this year, he started to endorse G.O.P. candidates in this year’s midterms and raised money for some of them. In June, he held a private summit for G.O.P. donors and politicians in Park City, Utah, where one of his five homes is located. According to a report from the Washington Post’s Philip Rucker, the event “quickly became a Romney revival. Minutes after the 2012 Republican presidential nominee welcomed his 300 guests, Joe Scarborough, the MSNBC host and former GOP congressman, urged them to begin a ‘Draft Romney’ movement in 2016.” Rucker reported that Romney even got some encouragement from a Democratic attendee, Brian Schweitzer, the former Governor of Montana, who said, “He would be a giant in a field of midgets.”

With that Post story, the Romney balloon was airborne. This past Sunday, appearing on CBS’s “Face the Nation,” Paul Ryan, Romney’s running mate in 2012, pumped a bit more air into it, saying, “I sure wish he would” run in 2016. “I think he’d make a phenomenal President. He has the intellect, the honor, the character, and the temperament to be a fantastic President.”

Scarborough, Ryan, and Schweitzer. With the endorsement of a focus group like that, who wouldn’t be tempted to reconsider his options?

Sadly—and here I am speaking as a thrill-seeking journalist rather than as a citizen—the answer is it’s likely that Willard Mitt Romney, a man who, for all his weaknesses as a Presidential candidate, knows a losing investment proposition when he sees one. If you examine the entirety of his interview with Hewitt rather than the headlines it generated, you get a rather different picture of his thinking. Here’s some of the exchange:


Hewitt: If you personally believed, I mean really, genuinely believed, that you were the only candidate who could beat Hillary, and that belief was confirmed by your family, your friends, and your respected political advisers, would you not then feel obliged to run?

Romney: Ha, ha. Well, Hugh, the reason I came to the conclusion I did, which is this is not the right time for me to run, is because of my belief that someone else stands a better chance of winning than I do. Had that not been the case, had I believed that I would be best positioned to beat Hillary Clinton, then I would be running. I actually believe that someone new that is not defined yet, someone who perhaps is from the next generation, will be able to catch fire, potentially build a movement, and be able to beat Hillary Clinton. … I think we’ve got a number of very good people looking at this race. I’m expecting someone to be able to catch fire and get the job done.

Hewitt pressed on, unabashed. It was he, not Romney, who first used the line “circumstances can change.” Romney agreed that they could, but rather than seizing upon this possibility he virtually dismissed it. Citing a scene from “Dumb and Dumber,” the 1994 Jim Carey flick, in which the comedian celebrates after being told that he has but the tiniest chance of winning over Lauren Holly, Romney said that there was a “one out of a million” chance that he might end up running. He even explained what he meant. “Let’s say all the guys that were running all came together and said, ‘Hey, we’ve all decided we can’t do it. You must do it.’ Ha, ha, ha. That’s the one out of a million we’re thinking about.”

Was that a not too subtle endorsement for a “draft Romney” campaign? Or was it a bow to reality from a sixty-seven-year-old, twice-defeated Presidential candidate who knows that his chance has come and gone? The latter, surely. But, hey, we can all dream.

What else does a 67 year old unemployed multi-millionaire have to do :roll: :???:

And just like the last time- I have a hard time in seeing anyone worth a quarter of a Billion $ being able to relate to the average Joe Blow or Mary Doe relating to the real world or everyday life challenges !
 

loomixguy

Well-known member
And the community organizer YOU voted for was even less able to relate to everyday folks, unless everyday folks are entertainers, athletes, or Muslim loving agitators.
 

Traveler

Well-known member
Speaking of Draft Dodger, why don't we ever hear anything about former Rapist in Chief, Bill Clinton? Why would Hitlery be married to something like that if she didn't share in his convictions, or lack of? What kind of first lady will he make? Her SOS gig was sure a glaring F Up.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1070433/posts scroll down a bit.
 

Traveler

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
littlejoe said:
In a stunning and sensational development that had political correspondents from Maine to Chesapeake Bay abandoning their families on the beach and rummaging through their luggage for their laptops, Mitt Romney told Hugh Hewitt, the conservative radio host, that he might yet be persuaded to run for President again in 2016. After echoing previous statements that he’s already decided not to be a candidate, Romney appeared to equivocate, saying, “circumstances can change, but I’m not going to let my head go there.”

“Come on,” I hear you say, between splutters, “it can’t be true.” Romney in 2016? The star-crossed one-per-center, who crashed out of the 2008 campaign after Super Tuesday and got so badly kicked around in 2012 that he ended up, courtesy of a soft-soap Netflix documentary, as someone to be pitied rather than loathed and feared? The robotic, private-equity tycoon and former Governor of Massachusetts, who has a car elevator in his garage and a silver foot in his mouth?



Yes, that’s the guy. The Mittster, to you and me.

For weeks now, political journalists desperate for something more exciting to write about than midterm primary races in Florida and Arizona have been whipping up speculation about Romney staging a Nixon-style resurrection, blithely ignoring the fact that he has repeatedly said that he isn’t interested in subjecting himself, yet again, to the mercies of Republican primary voters, Democratic dirt diggers, and media tormentors. Back in January, when the possibility of another run was put to him by Ashley Parker, of the Times, Romney replied, “Oh, no, no, no. No, no, no, no, no. No, no, no.”

Because political operatives and journalists are skeptical types, such vociferous denials only piqued their interest. They happened to coincide with President Obama’s approval ratings hitting new lows and Romney emerging from his post-2012 purdah. Earlier this year, he started to endorse G.O.P. candidates in this year’s midterms and raised money for some of them. In June, he held a private summit for G.O.P. donors and politicians in Park City, Utah, where one of his five homes is located. According to a report from the Washington Post’s Philip Rucker, the event “quickly became a Romney revival. Minutes after the 2012 Republican presidential nominee welcomed his 300 guests, Joe Scarborough, the MSNBC host and former GOP congressman, urged them to begin a ‘Draft Romney’ movement in 2016.” Rucker reported that Romney even got some encouragement from a Democratic attendee, Brian Schweitzer, the former Governor of Montana, who said, “He would be a giant in a field of midgets.”

With that Post story, the Romney balloon was airborne. This past Sunday, appearing on CBS’s “Face the Nation,” Paul Ryan, Romney’s running mate in 2012, pumped a bit more air into it, saying, “I sure wish he would” run in 2016. “I think he’d make a phenomenal President. He has the intellect, the honor, the character, and the temperament to be a fantastic President.”

Scarborough, Ryan, and Schweitzer. With the endorsement of a focus group like that, who wouldn’t be tempted to reconsider his options?

Sadly—and here I am speaking as a thrill-seeking journalist rather than as a citizen—the answer is it’s likely that Willard Mitt Romney, a man who, for all his weaknesses as a Presidential candidate, knows a losing investment proposition when he sees one. If you examine the entirety of his interview with Hewitt rather than the headlines it generated, you get a rather different picture of his thinking. Here’s some of the exchange:


Hewitt: If you personally believed, I mean really, genuinely believed, that you were the only candidate who could beat Hillary, and that belief was confirmed by your family, your friends, and your respected political advisers, would you not then feel obliged to run?

Romney: Ha, ha. Well, Hugh, the reason I came to the conclusion I did, which is this is not the right time for me to run, is because of my belief that someone else stands a better chance of winning than I do. Had that not been the case, had I believed that I would be best positioned to beat Hillary Clinton, then I would be running. I actually believe that someone new that is not defined yet, someone who perhaps is from the next generation, will be able to catch fire, potentially build a movement, and be able to beat Hillary Clinton. … I think we’ve got a number of very good people looking at this race. I’m expecting someone to be able to catch fire and get the job done.

Hewitt pressed on, unabashed. It was he, not Romney, who first used the line “circumstances can change.” Romney agreed that they could, but rather than seizing upon this possibility he virtually dismissed it. Citing a scene from “Dumb and Dumber,” the 1994 Jim Carey flick, in which the comedian celebrates after being told that he has but the tiniest chance of winning over Lauren Holly, Romney said that there was a “one out of a million” chance that he might end up running. He even explained what he meant. “Let’s say all the guys that were running all came together and said, ‘Hey, we’ve all decided we can’t do it. You must do it.’ Ha, ha, ha. That’s the one out of a million we’re thinking about.”

Was that a not too subtle endorsement for a “draft Romney” campaign? Or was it a bow to reality from a sixty-seven-year-old, twice-defeated Presidential candidate who knows that his chance has come and gone? The latter, surely. But, hey, we can all dream.

What else does a 67 year old unemployed multi-millionaire have to do :roll: :???:

And just like the last time- I have a hard time in seeing anyone worth a quarter of a Billion $ being able to relate to the average Joe Blow or Mary Doe relating to the real world or everyday life challenges !
It might take someone above average, a bit of an overachiever, to lift the country out of this mess. Just a thought.
 

ranch hand

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
littlejoe said:
In a stunning and sensational development that had political correspondents from Maine to Chesapeake Bay abandoning their families on the beach and rummaging through their luggage for their laptops, Mitt Romney told Hugh Hewitt, the conservative radio host, that he might yet be persuaded to run for President again in 2016. After echoing previous statements that he’s already decided not to be a candidate, Romney appeared to equivocate, saying, “circumstances can change, but I’m not going to let my head go there.”

“Come on,” I hear you say, between splutters, “it can’t be true.” Romney in 2016? The star-crossed one-per-center, who crashed out of the 2008 campaign after Super Tuesday and got so badly kicked around in 2012 that he ended up, courtesy of a soft-soap Netflix documentary, as someone to be pitied rather than loathed and feared? The robotic, private-equity tycoon and former Governor of Massachusetts, who has a car elevator in his garage and a silver foot in his mouth?



Yes, that’s the guy. The Mittster, to you and me.

For weeks now, political journalists desperate for something more exciting to write about than midterm primary races in Florida and Arizona have been whipping up speculation about Romney staging a Nixon-style resurrection, blithely ignoring the fact that he has repeatedly said that he isn’t interested in subjecting himself, yet again, to the mercies of Republican primary voters, Democratic dirt diggers, and media tormentors. Back in January, when the possibility of another run was put to him by Ashley Parker, of the Times, Romney replied, “Oh, no, no, no. No, no, no, no, no. No, no, no.”

Because political operatives and journalists are skeptical types, such vociferous denials only piqued their interest. They happened to coincide with President Obama’s approval ratings hitting new lows and Romney emerging from his post-2012 purdah. Earlier this year, he started to endorse G.O.P. candidates in this year’s midterms and raised money for some of them. In June, he held a private summit for G.O.P. donors and politicians in Park City, Utah, where one of his five homes is located. According to a report from the Washington Post’s Philip Rucker, the event “quickly became a Romney revival. Minutes after the 2012 Republican presidential nominee welcomed his 300 guests, Joe Scarborough, the MSNBC host and former GOP congressman, urged them to begin a ‘Draft Romney’ movement in 2016.” Rucker reported that Romney even got some encouragement from a Democratic attendee, Brian Schweitzer, the former Governor of Montana, who said, “He would be a giant in a field of midgets.”

With that Post story, the Romney balloon was airborne. This past Sunday, appearing on CBS’s “Face the Nation,” Paul Ryan, Romney’s running mate in 2012, pumped a bit more air into it, saying, “I sure wish he would” run in 2016. “I think he’d make a phenomenal President. He has the intellect, the honor, the character, and the temperament to be a fantastic President.”

Scarborough, Ryan, and Schweitzer. With the endorsement of a focus group like that, who wouldn’t be tempted to reconsider his options?

Sadly—and here I am speaking as a thrill-seeking journalist rather than as a citizen—the answer is it’s likely that Willard Mitt Romney, a man who, for all his weaknesses as a Presidential candidate, knows a losing investment proposition when he sees one. If you examine the entirety of his interview with Hewitt rather than the headlines it generated, you get a rather different picture of his thinking. Here’s some of the exchange:


Hewitt: If you personally believed, I mean really, genuinely believed, that you were the only candidate who could beat Hillary, and that belief was confirmed by your family, your friends, and your respected political advisers, would you not then feel obliged to run?

Romney: Ha, ha. Well, Hugh, the reason I came to the conclusion I did, which is this is not the right time for me to run, is because of my belief that someone else stands a better chance of winning than I do. Had that not been the case, had I believed that I would be best positioned to beat Hillary Clinton, then I would be running. I actually believe that someone new that is not defined yet, someone who perhaps is from the next generation, will be able to catch fire, potentially build a movement, and be able to beat Hillary Clinton. … I think we’ve got a number of very good people looking at this race. I’m expecting someone to be able to catch fire and get the job done.

Hewitt pressed on, unabashed. It was he, not Romney, who first used the line “circumstances can change.” Romney agreed that they could, but rather than seizing upon this possibility he virtually dismissed it. Citing a scene from “Dumb and Dumber,” the 1994 Jim Carey flick, in which the comedian celebrates after being told that he has but the tiniest chance of winning over Lauren Holly, Romney said that there was a “one out of a million” chance that he might end up running. He even explained what he meant. “Let’s say all the guys that were running all came together and said, ‘Hey, we’ve all decided we can’t do it. You must do it.’ Ha, ha, ha. That’s the one out of a million we’re thinking about.”

Was that a not too subtle endorsement for a “draft Romney” campaign? Or was it a bow to reality from a sixty-seven-year-old, twice-defeated Presidential candidate who knows that his chance has come and gone? The latter, surely. But, hey, we can all dream.

What else does a 67 year old unemployed multi-millionaire have to do :roll: :???:

And just like the last time- I have a hard time in seeing anyone worth a quarter of a Billion $ being able to relate to the average Joe Blow or Mary Doe relating to the real world or everyday life challenges !

This is what the left do...they are so jealous of the R's because they have the brains to make money and not spend what they make at the bars. Why do you OT think a successful person can not run this country successful?
 

Steve

Well-known member
OldTimer said:
And just like the last time- I have a hard time in seeing anyone worth a quarter of a Billion $ being able to relate to the average Joe Blow or Mary Doe relating to the real world or everyday life challenges !

this shows how uneducated you are on the issues and what this country needed then and now...

we are about to get dragged back into two wars.. one in the middle east.. and another cold war is already brewing..

our economy is still failing. and you can't relate to some guy cause he made it..

so instead you vote for some schmuck who never had a job.. yet was handed "position after position",

and then to make it worse you knew what a schmuck obama was so you threw your vote away..

Romney may not have been my first choice,.. but he was the best choice for our country..
 

Steve

Well-known member
we moved into a $62-a-month basement apartment with a cement floor and lived there two years.

“It was tiny. And I didn’t have money to carpet the floor. But you can get remnants, samples, so I glued them together, all different colors. It looked awful, but it was carpeting.

“We were happy"

“Mitt and I walked to class together, shared housekeeping, had a lot of pasta and tuna fish and learned hard lessons.



“We had our first child in that tiny apartment. We couldn’t afford a desk, so we used a door propped on sawhorses in our bedroom. It was a big door, so we could study on it together.

“The funny thing is that I never expected help. My father had become wealthy through hard work, as did Mitt’s father, but I never expected our parents to take care of us. They’d visit, laugh and say, `We can’t believe you guys are living like this.’ They’d take us out to dinner, have a good time, then leave.

“Now, every once in a while, we say if things get rough, we can go back to a $62-a-month apartment and be happy. All we need is each other and a little corner and we’ll be fine.”

I guess that can't compare to Hillery's dead broke with only a few million in the bank, while living in a multi-million dollar mansion story..

or how Obama bought a house from a now convicted person for a song...
or slept with his roommate in the same bed,.. or was it a couch.. ?
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
What else does a 67 year old unemployed multi-millionaire have to do

And just like the last time- I have a hard time in seeing anyone worth a quarter of a Billion $ being able to relate to the average Joe Blow or Mary Doe relating to the real world or everyday life challenges !

Hey ****-for-brains, the country doesn't need a president who relates to the average Joe Blow or Mary Doe, we've tried that first with Jimmy Carter and then with the Messiah. How's it workin' out?

You really should see a doctor. The dementia is definitely taking hold....or perhaps it's just the alcohol.

Oh, and the above words of wisdom from the guy who likes to "study" the issues, candidates, etc and make the wise choice. Thanks again for the Hope & Change, you idiot.
 

bearvalley

Well-known member
Whitewing said:
Oldtimer said:
What else does a 67 year old unemployed multi-millionaire have to do

And just like the last time- I have a hard time in seeing anyone worth a quarter of a Billion $ being able to relate to the average Joe Blow or Mary Doe relating to the real world or everyday life challenges !

Hey s***-for-brains, the country doesn't need a president who relates to the average Joe Blow or Mary Doe, we've tried that first with Jimmy Carter and then with the Messiah. How's it workin' out?

You really should see a doctor. The dementia is definitely taking hold....or perhaps it's just the alcohol.

Oh, and the above words of wisdom from the guy who likes to "study" the issues, candidates, etc and make the wise choice. Thanks again for the Hope & Change, you idiot.

S*** for brains is stretching it in OTs case. It's got to be either full blown dementia, too much of his Louisiana home brew or a complete lack of oxygen from sucking in thin Montana air. In any case a businessman running a country beats having a clown in office. At least he's half way through his second term, soon to be history and a bad memory. If old Hillary couldn't keep Billy happy how can she please a nation. But then maybe she'll recruit Monica and there will be happy times........ For the USA. :lol:
 

littlejoe

Well-known member
Whitewing said:
LJ, if I ask you a serious question, could you attempt to answer it?

Since it appears your post is mocking a potential run by Mitt Romney in 2016, could you explain to us here what it is about the man that you dislike, or perhaps more to the point, how it is you view him in lesser terms than Barack Obama?

" perhaps more to the point, how it is you view him in lesser terms than Barack Obama?"

I don't. Mitt has at least accomplished something. I did vote for Obama the first time---I thought he wouldn't buy into the military/industrial bull and would disengage from Bush's wars. Wrong there. Obama, Clintons, both---cheney--bushie-----none of these people should even be mentioned have /been mentioned or considered to be involved in governing this country. ditto Romney---
 

loomixguy

Well-known member
littlejoe said:
Whitewing said:
LJ, if I ask you a serious question, could you attempt to answer it?

Since it appears your post is mocking a potential run by Mitt Romney in 2016, could you explain to us here what it is about the man that you dislike, or perhaps more to the point, how it is you view him in lesser terms than Barack Obama?

" perhaps more to the point, how it is you view him in lesser terms than Barack Obama?"

I did vote for Obama the first time---

There, you just admitted you have feces for brains and are part of the problem, just like your twin OT.
 

Steve

Well-known member
littlejoe said:
Whitewing said:
LJ, if I ask you a serious question, could you attempt to answer it?

Since it appears your post is mocking a potential run by Mitt Romney in 2016, could you explain to us here what it is about the man that you dislike, or perhaps more to the point, how it is you view him in lesser terms than Barack Obama?

" perhaps more to the point, how it is you view him in lesser terms than Barack Obama?"

I don't. Mitt has at least accomplished something. I did vote for Obama the first time---I thought he wouldn't buy into the military/industrial bull and would disengage from Bush's wars. Wrong there. Obama, Clintons, both---cheney--bushie-----none of these people should even be mentioned have /been mentioned or considered to be involved in governing this country. ditto Romney---

I really hate to get involved in this one,.. but why did you plagiarize OT's answer?

and since you wouldn't vote fro Romney.. .then it must have been Johnson the only other guy on the ballot in MT ... :shock: :roll: :lol:

You and OT may not be the same person.. sharing multiple identities.. but you two are pretty much in lockstep.. :roll:
 

redrobin

Well-known member
You would think that someone that has been everywhere and is well rounded in business ventures etc would have sense enough to not vote for and empty suited community organizer. Only an absolute idiot would vote for Obama the first or second time. There is the second segment of people that voted for Obama, they are the ones that want to involve theirselves in sin and have someone else pay their medical bills that ensue. Alcoholics, homosexuals, prostitutes, drug addicts, etc.
 
Top