• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

mj - romney invested millions in chinese firm..

Help Support Ranchers.net:

beethoven

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 11, 2009
Messages
746
Reaction score
0
Location
alberta
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/07/bain-capital-mitt-romney-outsourcing-china-global-tech


EXCLUSIVE: Romney Invested Millions in Chinese Firm That Profited on US Outsourcing
The GOP candidate decries China poaching US jobs. But at Bain he held a large stake in a Chinese company that did just that.

—By David Corn
| Wed Jul. 11, 2012 8:10 PM PDT
522



Last month, Mitt Romney's campaign got into a dustup with the Washington Post after the newspaper reported that Bain Capital, the private equity firm the GOP presidential candidate founded, invested in several US companies that outsourced jobs to China and India. The campaign indignantly demanded a retraction, claiming that these businesses did not send jobs overseas while Romney was running Bain, and the Post stood by its investigation. Yet there is another aspect to the Romney-as-outsourcer controversy. According to government documents reviewed by Mother Jones, Romney, when he was in charge of Bain, invested heavily in a Chinese manufacturing company that depended on US outsourcing for its profits—and that explicitly stated that such outsourcing was crucial to its success.

This previously unreported deal runs counter to Romney's tough talk on the campaign trail regarding China. "We will not let China continue to steal jobs from the United States of America," Romney declared in February. But with this investment, Romney sought to make money off a foreign company that banked on American firms outsourcing manufacturing overseas.

On April 17, 1998, Brookside Capital Partners Fund, a Bain Capital affiliate, filed a report with the Securities and Exchange Commission noting that it had acquired 6.13 percent of Hong Kong-based Global-Tech Appliances, which manufactured household appliances in a production facility in the industrial city of Dongguan, China. That August, according to another SEC filing, Brookside upped its interest in Global-Tech to 10.3 percent. Both SEC filings identified Romney as the person in control of this investment: "Mr. W. Mitt Romney is the sole shareholder, sole director, President and Chief Executive Officer of Brookside Inc. and thus is the controlling person of Brookside Inc." Each of these documents was signed by Domenic Ferrante, a managing director of Brookside and Bain.

The SEC filings do not reveal how much Romney initially invested in Global-Tech (which is now known as Global-Tech Advanced Innovations). But Brookside first acquired 748,000 shares at a time when Global-Tech was mounting an IPO at $19 a share. If that was the purchase price Brookside paid, then Romney's firm originally invested $14.2 million in the company.

At the time Romney was acquiring shares in Global-Tech, the firm publicly acknowledged that its strategy was to profit from prominent US companies outsourcing production abroad. On September 4, 1998, Global-Tech issued a press release announcing it was postponing completion of a $30 million expansion of its Dongguan facility because Sunbeam, a prominent American consumer products company and a major client of Global-Tech, was cutting back on outsourcing as part of an overall consolidation. But John C.K. Sham, Global-Tech's president and CEO, said, "Although it appears that customers such as Sunbeam are not outsourcing their manufacturing as quickly as we had anticipated, we still believe that the long-term trend toward outsourcing will continue." Global-Tech, which in mid-1998 announced fiscal year sales of $118.3 million (an increase of 89 percent over the previous year), also manufactured household appliances for Hamilton Beach, Mr. Coffee, Proctor-Silex, Revlon, and Vidal Sassoon, and its chief exec was hoping for more outsourcing from these and other American firms.

The Romney campaign and Bain Capital have insisted that Romney departed Bain in February 1999 to head the troubled 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City and had no involvement in the private equity firm's deals after that point—a contention that has been challenged by the Obama campaign. But the Global-Tech Appliances transactions occurred long before Romney jetted off to Utah.

Brookside downsized its Global-Tech holdings later in 1998. An SEC filing submitted on December 21, 1998, reported that the Bain affiliate now controlled only 4.63 percent of the company's shares. But Brookside was sharing its stake in Global-Tech with Sankaty High Yield Asset Investors LTD—a Bermuda-based corporation of which Romney was the "the sole shareholder, a director, and President." That is, Romney had split his Global-Tech holdings between two of his various business entities. (The SEC filing doesn't indicate why he did that.)

Sankaty is a story in itself. It was recently the focus of an Associated Press investigation that reported that Sankaty "is among several Romney holdings that have not been fully disclosed" and that there is a "mystery surrounding" Sankaty. Reporting on this Romney entity, Vanity Fair noted that "investments in tax havens such as Bermuda raise many questions, because they are in 'jurisdictions where there is virtually no tax and virtually no compliance,' as one Miami-based offshore lawyer put it." With Sankaty, Romney was using a mysterious Bermuda-based entity to invest in a Chinese firm that thrived on US outsourcing.

In early 1999, Romney's investment in Global-Tech expanded again. An SEC report filed on March 25, 1999, stated that Brookside and Sankaty at this stage owned 9.11 percent of the firm's stock. Romney was still listed as the sole shareholder and president of both Brookside and Sankaty.

By this point, according to the open-to-question account offered by Bain and the Romney campaign, Romney no longer had any involvement in Bain deals. But the series of SEC filings show active Brookside and Sankaty trading in Global-Tech Appliances while Romney fully controlled these firms. The two Romney companies repeatedly changed their ownership stake in this Chinese firm, which was not shy about its dependence on outsourcing. In its 2001 annual report, Global-Tech noted that US outsourcing was essential to its prospects: "Household appliance companies are focusing on their primary strengths of marketing and distribution, while increasingly outsourcing product development and manufacturing…Our ability and commitment to develop new and innovative, high quality products at a low cost has allowed us to benefit from the increased outsourcing of product development and manufacturing by our customers."

In August 2000, Brookside and Sankaty sold their interest in Global-Tech, according to the SEC documents. With these filings disclosing minimum details about Romney's investment in Global-Tech, there is no telling how much money he made—or lost—on the deal.

A spokeswoman for Bain says that the company will not comment on the Global-Tech investment or provide any additional details about this deal. A Romney campaign official would not address the issue of Global-Tech profiting from US outsourcing, but this Romney aide maintains that this deal was nothing other than a routine investment in a foreign company: "t's my understanding that while Brookside is a part of Bain Capital, it is not a private equity vehicle. Brookside makes passive investments in public stock. They don't control or manage the companies they invest in. Brookside had a small ownership stake (9.11%) in Global-Tech…while Romney was there. If owning shares in a foreign company is somehow wrong, President Obama is guilty as well." (The Romney campaign points out that Obama's personal holdings include an investment in a Vanguard 500 Index retirement fund that contains shares in a handful of foreign companies.)

In recent weeks, Romney's involvement in outsourcing has become a contentious campaign issue. Late last month, the Obama campaign launched ads that accused Romney of being a "corporate raider" who "shipped jobs to China and Mexico" and slammed him as an "outsourcer in chief." The Romneyites cried foul, pointing to neutral fact-checkers who criticized the ads, and asserted that Obama was trying to distract from bad economic news. And the Romney campaign, pushing back on the Post story, maintained that the newspaper missed the difference between outsourcing and offshoring. This week, Romney declared that Obama was the real "outsourcer-in-chief," insisting that the president funded "energy companies, solar and wind energy companies that end up making their products outside the United States." (The New York Times immediately debunked much of Romney's attack, and the Washington Post's "Fact Checker" column awarded four Pinocchios to an Americans for Prosperity ad that in April made a similar claim about Obama and green-jobs outsourcing.)

Romney's Global-Tech deal adds a new dimension to the debate over Romney and outsourcing. Whether or not he was at the helm when Bain invested in US firms that did or did not ship jobs overseas, Romney was in command when a company he owned and controlled bought a large stake in a Chinese venture that counted on American companies sending manufacturing—and that means jobs—to China. These days, Romney rails against China for swiping American jobs and proclaims, "For me, it's all about good jobs for the American people." But when there was money to be made by acquiring a chunk of a Chinese company that aimed to displace American manufacturers (and American workers), Romney's patriotism did not interfere with the potential for profit.

see link, comments follow
 

Texan

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
3,180
Reaction score
65
Location
Texas
1999? Seriously? Is this the best that you liberals can do? Not a word from you about the taxpayer money that Obama sends overseas, but Romney invested private funds offshore in 1999 and it's a big deal? LMAO
 

TSR

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 27, 2005
Messages
2,115
Reaction score
0
Private investments during a presidential election may not matter to you but they might to others, Texan. BTW did any previous presidents send much money overseas?? Not that both partys haven't been guilty.
 

Steve

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
16,547
Reaction score
0
Location
Wildwood New Jersey
sometimes you have to read a story with a bit of knowledge of the facts...

federal financial disclosure forms show that he left active management of Bain Capital in February 1999."

liberals want to confuse the issue with innuendo and distract from the Presidents current dismal fiscal policy.
 

TSR

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 27, 2005
Messages
2,115
Reaction score
0
Leaving "active management" doesn't necessarily equate to having no influenence. But nevertheless, anyone really interested should just go to Wikipedia and type in Bain Capital in the search engine and read the entire passage and make up their own mind.
 

loomixguy

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2007
Messages
6,061
Reaction score
0
Location
The Dark Side
6% of a company, then 4% of the company?

Really?

Since when is it against the law to make money?

Jesus, Mary, & Joseph, Ma! He owned 6% of a company! That's enough to convince me! Git the rope! String him up, it'll tecah him a lesson!
:roll: :roll: :roll:
 

gearhead

Well-known member
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Location
Southern Az
Romney is co-founder of Bain Capital and during his actual full time tenure until 1999 created tens of thousands of jobs. Then he took over the Olympics in Utah that were in discussions of cancellation and saved them. Then after that successful bid he went on to be governor.
I don't believe for one second that he had time for Bain Capitol once he took over the Olympics. The Olympics were a train heading for derailment that was successfully navigated to great achievement.
 

Tam

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
12,759
Reaction score
0
Location
Sask
They were talking on TV today about Romney's so called outsourcing of US Jobs and a very interesting comment was made. Funny how the liberals are making such an issue about Obama's made up crap about Romney outsourcing considering the Obama Administration outsourced the whole US space Program by hiring Russia to transport US personal and supplies to the space station.


An April 6, 2010 a NASA press release stated that NASA had signed a modification to a contract with the Russian Federal Space Agency for crew transportation in 2013 and 2014. The additional cost -- $335 million -- would cover training, preparation and landing for six crew members. That math works out to about $55.8 million per astronaut.

Then in March 2011, NASA modified the contract with the Russians again to provide six seats a year in 2014 and 2015 for $752 million, or about $62.7 million per astronaut, per trip, said NASA spokeswoman Stephanie Schierholz. The increase reflects inflation in Russia, she said.

Then you consider the US tax payer money that Obama paid out that was shipped over sea.

Remember the $2 billion dollars he gave to Brazil to develop Off Shore drilling after shutting down US Off shore drilling. That was just the tip of the iceberg so does Obama really want to point the out sourcing finger at Romney? :roll:
 

Faster horses

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
28,938
Reaction score
163
Location
NE WY at the foot of the Big Horn mountains
His strategy is that the voters that don't want to know the real story,
will just listen to his crap and take it to the voting booth. 'If he says it,
it must be true', kind of people. Like Juan Williams. I heard him tonight
trying to stand up for Obama.........makes me shake my head....surely he is more intelligent than he sounds when he is defending Obama. Someone
from NH was on there tonight with him and he told Juan Williams
just how it really was! He didn't back off one inch. It was 'punch'
'counter punch'. They were talking about outsourcing jobs and Juan
was talking about Romney and the guy from NH listed a whole bunch
of outscourcing Obama has done. Green cars in Finland, Brazil, China,
and much more, the US taxpayers are financing. After Obama borrowed
the money from China, of course.
 

ANGUS327

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 30, 2005
Messages
291
Reaction score
0
Location
north of the 49th
gearhead said:
Romney is co-founder of Bain Capital and during his actual full time tenure until 1999 created tens of thousands of jobs. Then he took over the Olympics in Utah that were in discussions of cancellation and saved them. Then after that successful bid he went on to be governor.
I don't believe for one second that he had time for Bain Capitol once he took over the Olympics. The Olympics were a train heading for derailment that was successfully navigated to great achievement.

Maybe so but he wasn't a community organiser.
 

okfarmer

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Messages
1,059
Reaction score
0
Location
Oklahoma
TSR said:
Leaving "active management" doesn't necessarily equate to having no influenence. But nevertheless, anyone really interested should just go to Wikipedia and type in Bain Capital in the search engine and read the entire passage and make up their own mind.


:D yep, because not just any tom, dick, or harry can write something in wikipedia. Oh, sorry. They can.

When you can find facts from a credible source, you can rejoin the grown up conversation.
 

TSR

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 27, 2005
Messages
2,115
Reaction score
0
I guess your comment about any Tom,Dick, or Harry would also apply to internet posters. Thus, people can read the article, do the research, and make up their own mind. I might add, I don't think I need anyone's permission to post here.
 

beethoven

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 11, 2009
Messages
746
Reaction score
0
Location
alberta
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/12/mitt-romney-bain-departure_n_1669006.html?ir=Politics
 

hopalong

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 12, 2006
Messages
8,019
Reaction score
0
Location
Az.
You both need the sites administration crews permission to post here!!!!
Of course he is very lets lots of weirdos post, FLOUNDER, LIGHTNINGBOY, not naming others, so your statement you do not need permission is wrong like a lot of your other statements, :cry:
 

hopalong

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 12, 2006
Messages
8,019
Reaction score
0
Location
Az.
jodywy said:
gee my wife's government 401k has off shore investments

Did you get your wife's permission to post that/////

Did you check Wickiup to verify that it was true?????

:wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:
 

TSR

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 27, 2005
Messages
2,115
Reaction score
0
hopalong said:
You both need the sites administration crews permission to post here!!!!
Of course he is very lets lots of weirdos post, FLOUNDER, LIGHTNINGBOY, not naming others, so your statement you do not need permission is wrong like a lot of your other statements, :cry:

So Hoppy post the statements where the site administration crews gave you permission to post. I would like to see them-- where it says "You now have permission to post on Rnet."
 

jodywy

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
5,310
Reaction score
7
Location
Cabin Creek, Carlile,Wyoming
hopalong said:
jodywy said:
gee my wife's government 401k has off shore investments

Did you get your wife's permission to post that/////

Did you check Wickiup to verify that it was true?????

:wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:
:D she can pick any % of her 401K that id foreign investments usually better paying them the G fund(government)
 

Latest posts

Top