• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

More for the lurking liberals to think about. PLEASE

Tam

Well-known member
Who can you trust?

Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Head of the DNC, told a group she was speaking to that, the Republicans were risking Israel's National Security with their policies, when it was reported she said it, she lied and said she had not said it, BUT taped evidence of her speech proved otherwise. I will just post one of DWS's lies for now as I doubt that woman would recognize the truth if it walked up and slapped her in the face.

John Brennan, Obama's Director of the CIA told the American Public that Obama was not killing innocent Women and Children while targeting those terror suspects on his kill list, with his drones, BUT there are international reports to the contrary.

James Clapper from Obama's National Security Agency testified before the Congressional Oversight Committee that the NSA was not collecting data on Americans citizens BUT Snowden released evidence that they were not only collecting data on each and every American but on Heads of Foreign countries that are Allies to the US.

Susan Rice, Obama's Ambassador to the UN went on 5 TV Sunday Morning Talk Shows and said their best known Intel said the Benghazi attack that killed an Ambassador and three other Americans and Destroyed the US Consulate was caused by a Protest over a Video. BUT evidence proved it was a Premeditated TERRORIST ATTACK carried out by groups linked to Al Queada and the Obama Administration knew it within minutes of it starting.

Kathleen Sebelius testified that the Obamacare Website was On Schedule and ready for rollout BUT in the first month of enrollment they manage to get a whole 6 people signed up between glitches and crashes and later testimony was given by security experts that the site had no security built in so it was putting everyone's private information at risk to hackers and the payment part of the website was not even started yet.

Timothy Geithner Obama's Sec. of the Treasury cheated on his taxes

Lois Lerner an employee of the Obama IRS was called to testify in front of the Congressional Oversight Committee about what was going on with the IRS targeting of Conservative groups, and she plead the fifth after she claimed her innocent. Due to the fact she claimed the fifth after she claimed her innocence she has been subpoenaed to testify again. Her lawyer's answer was only if she gets immunity. What innocent person needs immunity? Oh wait emails have shown that she was working on plans to change IRS rules to clamp down on the group they were caught TARGETING so they could SILENCE THEM.

Mike Morell member of Obama's CIA claimed he had nothing to do with re-writing the Benghazi Talking points that were given to Susan Rice for her Sunday morning appearances BUT evidence that seems to point to him being very much involved with the rewrites right along with someone in the White House has showed up so he is being called back to testify. He left his government job and got a job with a business that advises HILLARY CLINTON the SOS that was in charge when the Benghazi talking points were RE-WRITTEN.

Hillary Clinton Obama's Sec of State and the Democrats next great hope to be 45th President of the US, told the American public along with the grieving families that Benghazi was caused by a Protest over a video, and to push her story she and Obama had the video producer arrested and tossed in jail. BUT evidence proved the White House knew within minutes it was a Terrorist attack and there are reports it was being monitored by drone from the White House Situation Room. AND a Democrat Control Senate committee investigation reported it was an attack that could have been PREVENTED if Hillary's DOS would have provided the Security that the dead Ambassador requested. Oh and let's not forget she said Obama would not be there when the three in the morning phone call came but she would be, But she wasn't and we still don't know why she wasn't. But What Does It Matter Now.

Eric Holder Obama's AG testified he didn't know anything about Fast and Furious But he had to come out and take back his Congressional Testimony as documents proved otherwise and when pushed on what he knew and when he knew it, Obama invoked Executive Privledge to protect him after Issa filed Contempt charges on him for all the stonewalling of JUSTICE for the Terry Family that lost a son to the guns that were ILLEGALLY SOLD INTO MEXICO BY THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION. .

Eric Holder testified he would not have anything to do with pressing/filing charges on the press for doing their jobs BUT Court Documents proved he signed and filed papers on James Rosen of Fox to seize his and his parents phone and email records. ANd evidence came out he also had the AP emails and phone records secretly seized.

Now you might ask why do all these members of the Obama Administration think they can get away with lying under oath and to the voters that pay their wages? Well could it be that their Boss the President of the US Barak Hussan Obama was awarded the Lie of the Year and that they do not see anyone that has lied before them being held accountable for their actions by anyone and that some are even being rewarded for their loyality to Obama with PROMOTIONS?

Please take this into account when voting in 2014. The US is a country that supposedly believes in Right, Freedoms, Liberty and JUSTICE FOR ALL. Where is the JUSTICE in allowing your Federal Government to openly lie to you and not be held accountable for it.

Democrat Constitutional Processor Jonathan Turley testified to the Congress this week that Obama needs to be stopped before he leaves office as he is destroying the 3 EQUAL BRANCHES of the Government with his overreach SO ask yourself if the Democrats retain Control of the Senate will Harry Reid do anything to Stop Obama? Especially since he abolished the filibuster in the Senate so he could sit any radical Obama wanted in his Administration without a fight from the minority Republicans. If the Republicans take power of the Senate at least they can control the flood of liberal Radicals into an already LYING ADMINISTRATION. And If Obama keeps using his UNCONSTITUTIONAL PEN that Professor Turley was testifying about they will have the power to stop him by filing impeachment papers on him. If the Dems control the Senate there is NOT WAY Harry Reid will support any attempts to stop him. He especially will never support the Impeachment of Obama as he would then have to admit his party made a big mistake by electing an incompetent inexperienced candidate into the Highest Seat in the World due to his SKIN COLOR.

Please think about this 77% of Americans believe the US is headed in the wrong direction and it is up to the VOTERS to turn this mess around and get it back on track by holding these people accountable for their actions.

If you, the VOTERS, will not hold this lying Administration and those protecting them in the Senate Accountable WHO WILL?


edit it for spelling :wink:

And to add

If you Expect Harry Reid to do anything about the LYING remember he was the one that just stood on the floor of the Senate and called every American that has voiced their horror stories dealing with Obamacare LIARS.

And if you are looking to Pelosi to save you, she told everyone that the Obamacare was a job creator and would provide millions of jobs but just the opposite is true by CBO reports as the bill give people the incentive to NOT WORK.
 

Tam

Well-known member
One more thing I know most if not all you liberals hated GW Bush as you saw him as a Liar over the WMD issue so if you think that why is Obama's lying any different?

He campaigned on the Promise he was going to CHANGE DC Did he do it? if not he LIED.

He said he was going to repair the US's reputation with foreign countries. Has he done it? If not he LIED. And if he fixed the US reputation why is Russia pushing and pulling on every corner to see where the breaking point is? Why is Iran laughing at Kerry and telling their people they won and the US are lifting/easing the sanctions that are crippling their country and they are going to have a Nuclear system too? Why did the Leadership of Syria step over the Red Line?

He told you Al Queade was on the run after he killed Osama, are they? if not he LIED. And if they are on the run who was in Benghazi, who is in Iraq and who has sent 3 times as many American soldiers home in caskets since Obama took over? and who trained the Boston Bombers that killed innocent Americans on AMERICAN SOIL?

He promised affordable healthcare for ALL Americans did he do it? If not he LIED and guess what he was awarded the LIE OF THE YEAR OVER HIS LAW OF THE LAND as you can't keep your insurance or doctors and the average family is not saving $2500, and not all Americans will be covered even with his trillion + dollar boondoggle that has give American citizens the INCENTIVE NOT TO WORK.

He took an Oath twice to uphold the US Constitution did he do it? if not he LIED and according to people a lot smarter that you or I he needs to be stopped before he leaves office so his UNCONSTITUTIONAL Overreaching of Power becomes the NORM.

So you say you hate Bush because he LIED over WDM and he got you into an illegal war, but who really LIED about WMD and who has the legal right to get you into War? Let's take the Who Lied question, first.

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." --Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." --Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by: -- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." -- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by: -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them." -- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." -- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" -- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." -- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

Did Bush lie are did he just take these DEMOCRATS WORD FOR IT and did what Clinton didn't since the US was attack on 911 under his watch?

Now about who got the US into War?

The Only people that can legally declare war in the US is CONGRESS and that is who voted on a BIPARTISAN VOTE to support the Iraq war. The only people that can fund a war is the CONGRESS that writes the bill that make government spending legal and they needed a BIPARTISAN VOTE to pass any bill while Bush was in power. So that means the Dems in DC are just as responsible for the War in Iraq as GW Bush was as they voted to support it and they FUNDED IT.

Well the only people that could declare war pre- Obama, was the Congress Now if you want to take out a Foreign country's leader just say you are not declaring war, you are just leading from behind and do as you like as the Congress will not stop you at least not a Democrat controlled one.

Seems as long as you are a Democrat of colored skin and have a Nobel Peace Prize Award sitting on your office desk, you can snoop on people, target people for political beliefs, intimidate the press, and kill people with a drone and LIE about it and the Left will sit quietly by and wait for a Republican Governor's staff to close down a bridge without him knowing and all hell breaks loose.

So if you are going to blame Bush and Christie for the things you THINK THEY DID Please for the sake of the rest of the world don't be Hypocrites and let Obama and his Administration get away with their proven LYING PLEASE.
 

Tam

Well-known member
bumped so the liberals that would like to discuss/debate Obama's version of telling the truth has a chance.
 
Top