• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

More law breaking from the Flaunter-in-Chief

Whitewing

Well-known member
Feds: Obama Broke Law with Bergdahl Swap

President Obama violated a “clear and unambiguous” law when he released five Guantanamo Bay detainees in exchange for Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl, the Government Accountability Office reported Thursday.

“[The Department of Defense] violated section 8111 because it did not notify the relevant congressional committees at least 30 days in advance of the transfer,” the GAO report said. “In addition, because DOD used appropriated funds to carry out the transfer when no money was available for that purpose, DOD violated the Antideficiency Act. The Antideficiency Act prohibits federal agencies from incurring obligations exceeding an amount available in an appropriation.”

The GAO rejected the idea that the action was legal and sidestepped the Obama team’s suggestion that the law is unconstitutional.

“It is not our role or our practice to determine the constitutionality of duly enacted statutes,” the report says. “In our view, where legislation has been passed by Congress and signed by the President, thereby satisfying the bicameralism and presentment requirements in the Constitution, that legislation is entitled to a heavy presumption in favor of constitutionality.”

Of course, to quote the fatman, there's precedence.......he's broken the law before. :lol:
 

Mike

Well-known member
Whitewing said:
Feds: Obama Broke Law with Bergdahl Swap

President Obama violated a “clear and unambiguous” law when he released five Guantanamo Bay detainees in exchange for Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl, the Government Accountability Office reported Thursday.

“[The Department of Defense] violated section 8111 because it did not notify the relevant congressional committees at least 30 days in advance of the transfer,” the GAO report said. “In addition, because DOD used appropriated funds to carry out the transfer when no money was available for that purpose, DOD violated the Antideficiency Act. The Antideficiency Act prohibits federal agencies from incurring obligations exceeding an amount available in an appropriation.”

The GAO rejected the idea that the action was legal and sidestepped the Obama team’s suggestion that the law is unconstitutional.

“It is not our role or our practice to determine the constitutionality of duly enacted statutes,” the report says. “In our view, where legislation has been passed by Congress and signed by the President, thereby satisfying the bicameralism and presentment requirements in the Constitution, that legislation is entitled to a heavy presumption in favor of constitutionality.”

Of course, to quote the fatman, there's precedence.......he's broken the law before. :lol:

Take the $Million$ in costs out of Buckwheat's check now, Impeach him after the election this Nov, and tolerate Biden's dumazz for a few months.
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Mike said:
Whitewing said:
Feds: Obama Broke Law with Bergdahl Swap

President Obama violated a “clear and unambiguous” law when he released five Guantanamo Bay detainees in exchange for Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl, the Government Accountability Office reported Thursday.

“[The Department of Defense] violated section 8111 because it did not notify the relevant congressional committees at least 30 days in advance of the transfer,” the GAO report said. “In addition, because DOD used appropriated funds to carry out the transfer when no money was available for that purpose, DOD violated the Antideficiency Act. The Antideficiency Act prohibits federal agencies from incurring obligations exceeding an amount available in an appropriation.”

The GAO rejected the idea that the action was legal and sidestepped the Obama team’s suggestion that the law is unconstitutional.

“It is not our role or our practice to determine the constitutionality of duly enacted statutes,” the report says. “In our view, where legislation has been passed by Congress and signed by the President, thereby satisfying the bicameralism and presentment requirements in the Constitution, that legislation is entitled to a heavy presumption in favor of constitutionality.”

Of course, to quote the fatman, there's precedence.......he's broken the law before. :lol:

Take the $Million$ in costs out of Buckwheat's check now, Impeach him after the election this Nov, and tolerate Biden's dumazz for a few months.

"Joe Biden reminds us of a simpler America, when a kid could go to the local drug store and buy cough syrup and model glue and leaded paint."

:lol:
 

Mike

Well-known member
Whitewing said:
Mike said:
Whitewing said:
Of course, to quote the fatman, there's precedence.......he's broken the law before. :lol:

Take the $Million$ in costs out of Buckwheat's check now, Impeach him after the election this Nov, and tolerate Biden's dumazz for a few months.

"Joe Biden reminds us of a simpler America, when a kid could go to the local drug store and buy cough syrup and model glue and leaded paint."

:lol:

At least he's smarter than his constituents. But not by much.
 

Traveler

Well-known member
Whitewing said:
Mike said:
Whitewing said:
Of course, to quote the fatman, there's precedence.......he's broken the law before. :lol:

Take the $Million$ in costs out of Buckwheat's check now, Impeach him after the election this Nov, and tolerate Biden's dumazz for a few months.

"Joe Biden reminds us of a simpler America, when a kid could go to the local drug store and buy cough syrup and model glue and leaded paint."

:lol:
:lol: :lol:

And read Batman comics, where he got his debating skills.
 
Top