• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Ranchers.net

6/15/2005 10:04:00 AM


Cattle Alert: McAdams Letter to Secretary Johanns



Dear Secretary Johanns:



On behalf of our 25,000 members and 64 affiliate organizations, I would like to express deep concerns over a number of issues related to USDA’s announcement on June 10, 2005 regarding BSE testing. This announcement is creating great uncertainty within our industry, and is expressing itself in greater market fluctuations—resulting in an increased exposure to market risk and economic harm.



The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) expects a full explanation of the circumstances that caused the Office of Inspector General (OIG) to recommend additional testing of previously identified BSE negative animals. While NCBA has supported the surveillance program and its intent, these most recent actions by USDA and the OIG do not increase the safety of U.S. beef, nor do they improve the health of the U.S. cowherd, but instead put the industry at greater economic risk.



We call upon USDA to clearly communicate the scientific basis for the protocol that they will follow, and the timeframe that the industry can expect to bring this current issue to resolution. It is important not to communicate the results of this situation until they are definitive. To prevent further economic uncertainty in the market, USDA should not release intermediate test results or additional information that is not final and conclusive in nature.



We believe it is imperative that USDA clearly restore integrity to the process to avoid further and lasting criticism that ultimately costs producers their livelihood through the erosion of consumer confidence, loss of international markets, and unnecessary market volatility.



NCBA calls for a renewed effort from USDA to follow a consistent protocol in testing that protects consumer confidence and mitigates economic harm to cattlemen. NCBA remains committed to a science based approach in addressing these concerns, but cannot tolerate actions that serve political pressures or pseudo-science over a sound surveillance program.



I look forward to personally meeting with you to discuss this issue in the near future.



Sincerely,


Jim McAdams
Top