Yep we are back to blaming the Benghazi attack on a video according to the New York Times article released today. :roll:
We have heard over a year of facts backed up by US intelligence proving it was a PREMEDITATED TERRORIST ATTACK FROM A AL QUEADE LINKED ORGANIZATION that destroyed all the lies Obama, Hillary and Sue Rice tried to spew for weeks after, so do they really think they can protect Hillary's political career by trying to convince everyone the video was to blame AGAIN? NOPE She wasn't responsible when she didn't provide requested extra security to those she was to be protecting as the Sec of State, it was a spontaneous reaction to a video? :roll:
I doubt this article is going to protect Hillary. I'm betting it will bring the Benghazi fight back to the media's attention to be rehashed to prove the NEW YORK TIMES is a liberal rag out to protect their favorite candidates from their incompetence and miserable failures, IE Hillary from her "WHAT DOES IT MATTER NOW" Comment. :x
We have heard over a year of facts backed up by US intelligence proving it was a PREMEDITATED TERRORIST ATTACK FROM A AL QUEADE LINKED ORGANIZATION that destroyed all the lies Obama, Hillary and Sue Rice tried to spew for weeks after, so do they really think they can protect Hillary's political career by trying to convince everyone the video was to blame AGAIN? NOPE She wasn't responsible when she didn't provide requested extra security to those she was to be protecting as the Sec of State, it was a spontaneous reaction to a video? :roll:
I doubt this article is going to protect Hillary. I'm betting it will bring the Benghazi fight back to the media's attention to be rehashed to prove the NEW YORK TIMES is a liberal rag out to protect their favorite candidates from their incompetence and miserable failures, IE Hillary from her "WHAT DOES IT MATTER NOW" Comment. :x