• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

New York Times destroying their Credibility even further

Tam

Well-known member
Yep we are back to blaming the Benghazi attack on a video according to the New York Times article released today. :roll:

We have heard over a year of facts backed up by US intelligence proving it was a PREMEDITATED TERRORIST ATTACK FROM A AL QUEADE LINKED ORGANIZATION that destroyed all the lies Obama, Hillary and Sue Rice tried to spew for weeks after, so do they really think they can protect Hillary's political career by trying to convince everyone the video was to blame AGAIN? NOPE She wasn't responsible when she didn't provide requested extra security to those she was to be protecting as the Sec of State, it was a spontaneous reaction to a video? :roll:

I doubt this article is going to protect Hillary. I'm betting it will bring the Benghazi fight back to the media's attention to be rehashed to prove the NEW YORK TIMES is a liberal rag out to protect their favorite candidates from their incompetence and miserable failures, IE Hillary from her "WHAT DOES IT MATTER NOW" Comment. :x
 

Tam

Well-known member
Taken from the NYT's article

Months of investigation by The New York Times, centered on extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context, turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault. The attack was led, instead, by fighters who had benefited directly from NATO’s extensive air power and logistics support during the uprising against Colonel Qaddafi. And contrary to claims by some members of Congress, it was fueled in large part by anger at an American-made video denigrating Islam.

I guess we are to ignore the Congressional testimony from those Americans on the ground in Benghazi and believe the liberal rag. :roll:
 
Top