• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Nothing not already known

iwannabeacowboy

Well-known member
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/07/hillary-clinton-missing-emails-secretary-state-department-personal-server-investigation-fbi-214016


Anyone else wonder what would have happened if Clinton had been recommended for indictment? Who would the socialists have run? Bernie who had the most delegate votes, Biden, or the Fake Indian?

And had they, do you think that those besides Bernie entering the race so late would have been given an unfair advantage of not having months of primary dirt drudged up and an armory at the ready to lob at them?

We're still laughable for our lack of rule of law. But I wonder if all of this will be enough to keep Hitlery from reaching office. If you read enough comments, more than a few long term dems are dissatisfied with her as an option. Maybe enough so that they stay home in November.

If it wasn't for the future of the country, this would be better than any day time soap opera.
 

iwannabeacowboy

Well-known member
But then there is an instance where the State Department cable traffic rises and there are few if any Clinton corresponding emails. It’s the case of Rosatom, the Russian State Nuclear Agency: Clinton and senior officials at the State Department received dozens of cables on the subject of Rosatom’s activities around the world, including a hair-raising cable about Russian efforts to dominate the uranium market. As secretary of state, Clinton was a central player in a variety of diplomatic initiatives involving Rosatom officials. But strangely, there is only one email that mentions Rosatom in Clinton’s entire collection, an innocuous email about Rosatom’s activities in Ecuador. To put that into perspective, there are more mentions of LeBron James, yoga and NBC’s Saturday Night Live than the Russian Nuclear Agency in Clinton’s emails deemed “official.”

What could explain this lack of emails on the Russian Nuclear Agency? Were Clinton’s aides negligent in passing along unimportant information while ignoring the far more troubling matters concerning Rosatom? Possibly. Or, were emails on this subject deleted as falling into the “personal” category? It is certainly odd that there’s virtually no email traffic on this subject in particular. Remember that a major deal involving Rosatom that was of vital concern to Clinton Foundation donors went down in 2009 and 2010. Rosatom bought a small Canadian uranium company owned by nine investors who were or became major Clinton Foundation donors, sending $145 million in contributions. The Rosatom deal required approval from several departments, including the State Department.

But the system by which this sorting took place was highly arbitrary, and was undertaken not by objective government officials but by lawyers and close aides. Keep in mind that those lawyers have used a more expansive term than Clinton to describe what was deleted. They called them “private, personal records.” By this definition, “private, personal records” doesn’t just have to apply to wedding planning; that term could involve anything related to the Clinton Foundation or Bill’s commercial activities. But the world has a right to know if and when Hillary Clinton’s State Department work overlapped with the Clinton Foundation’s agenda—and what resulted from such blurring of lines.
The media has spent a lot of time parsing through the Clinton emails that already have been released—compiling lists, looking for specific names or discussion of particular issues. But they ought to pay more attention to the holes. Bob Woodward has declared that Hillary Clinton’s email scandal “reminds me of the Nixon tapes.” He’s right. In that case and here, it’s not what’s in the record that’s most troubling. It’s what’s not there.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/07/hillary-clinton-missing-emails-secretary-state-department-personal-server-investigation-fbi-214016#ixzz4DlunRAZD
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
 

Traveler

Well-known member
Big Muddy rancher said:
Hillary's lawyers combed through her emails before the FBI got them. There was Top Secret emails that lawyers without Security clearance saw.
More than enough for charges right there.
 

iwannabeacowboy

Well-known member
In addition, who was the recipient of the classified information? Did they have clearence?

Did the private network technicians?

Who sent it to her unsecure network?
 
Top