• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

NYT is questioning Trumps Wiretapping comment

Tam

Well-known member
from their Jan 19 2017 article

At one point, the F.B.I. was so serious about its investigation into the server that it asked The Times to delay publication. Meanwhile, reporters had met with a former British intelligence officer who was building the dossier. While his findings were difficult to confirm, Times reporting bore out that he was respected in his craft. And of his material that was checkable, no significant red flags emerged. What’s more, said one journalist frustrated with the process, a covert link seemed like a plausible explanation for the strange bromance between Trump and Putin.

There were disagreements about whether to hold back. There was even an actual draft of a story. But it never saw daylight. The deciding vote was Baquet’s, who was adamant, then and now, that they made the right call.

“We heard about the back-channel communications between the Russians and Trump,” he said. “We reported it, and found no evidence that it was true. We wrote everything we knew — and we wrote a lot. Anybody that thinks we sat on stuff is outrageous. It’s just false.”


So the NYT knew about the serious FBI investigation into a server that Trump did not know they were investigating, how did they investigate it if they did not secretly wiretap it? If they wiretapped it there should be a warrant as it is illegal to just wiretap without one. The NYT said it was so serious the FBI ASKED them to delay publication. Tell me the FBI was not being POLITICAL when they asked the NYT to delay publication during a Presidential election? If Comey did not know this was going on then he needs to be fired as his agents were out of Control on a case that should have had top supervision because of the sensitve nature of the case.
 

Tam

Well-known member
For months we have read headlines about how the Left was going to take Trump out of the election as their Government sources were telling them about info collected by their surveillance programs during investigations into Russia Trump link and now they are calling Trump a liar as he used THEIR ARTICLES to call for an investigation. Spicer was right yesterday to call the hypocrites out when they are asking him if Trump is going to apologize over the Wiretap tweets as Intel committees see no evidence he was "WIRETAPPED" but they refuse to apologize or even DROP the Russia Trump colluded story after Obama's own heads of intel have said there is NO EVIDENCE to back those liberal Trump destroying stories. The NYT is the worse as that is the paper most look to.
 

Faster horses

Well-known member
Now that he no longer works for Hillary, Michael Morell speaks out:

Angry Patriot) – It’s always extra satisfying when someone on the other side comes out in our favor, and this time is no different!

Former Acting CIA Director and Hillary Clinton endorser Michael Morell spoke out at an event on Wednesday held by Cipher Brief, saying there’s absolutely no evidence to support claims of President Trump colluding with Russia, via NBC News.

“On the question of the Trump campaign conspiring with the Russians here, there is smoke, but there is no fire, at all…There’s no little campfire, there’s no little candle, there’s no spark. And there’s a lot of people looking for it,” Morell stated.

This is a pretty bold statement for Morell to make considering it was he, among others, who started the Trump-Russia collusion claims in the first place last August. However, we commend him for coming forward with the truth — now that he’s no longer under Hillary’s thumb.

No doubt Morell started this ugly rumor hoping to gain favor with the Democrat party during election season. After all, Clinton had promised to make Morell director of the CIA if she won.

Now that Hillary Clinton has lost, Morell can go back to telling the truth about what’s really going on, even if it means going against everyone else who still sides with the candidate he once publicly endorsed.

At the Cipher Brief event, Morell also referred to the words of James Clapper, the former director of national intelligence. In a March 5 interview with Meet the Press, Clapper stated he had seen zero evidence of any ties between Trump and Russia.

“That’s a pretty strong statement by General Clapper,” Morell added. He clearly took the words of Director Clapper very seriously as he’s now changed his tune considerably.

This is a devastating blow the Democrat party as they have been pushing this narrative from day one and now have a huge piece of egg on their face from one of their own insiders.

It’s good to see that some liberals are finally opening their eyes to the fact that our president did nothing wrong, and that he, in fact, was a victim of the previous administration’s abuse of power. Even Morell brought up the recent accusations of Obama using a British agent to spy on Trump!

As more and more evidence comes out, fewer and fewer baseless rumors are left for the “true believers” to grasp onto as “facts.” There was NO Trump-Russia collusion going on — and more proof of that is surfacing each and every day.

We the People have known for a long time that our president is on the up-and-up, but having a respected member of the other side come out and say so as well can only help our cause. Soon, EVERYONE will have to wake up and face the truth.

http://www.angrypatriotmovement.com/former-cia-director-on-trump/


https://www.teaparty.org/breaking-former-cia-director-comes-forward-spills-beans-trump-224221/
 

Steve

Well-known member
iwannabeacowboy said:
If Flynn's conversations were tapped, what makes anyone believe Trump's haven't been?

What FISA warrant was signed for Flynn?

Liberal version,.. Flynn was never wiretapped or surveiled, he just happened to be on a call with the Russian who was and they just happen to save the transcript and somehow someone leaked it out... no big deal happens all the time. :roll:
 

Tam

Well-known member
Problem with that is they also have transcripts of Trump's conversations with two foreign leaders, were they also wiretapping Mexico and the Aussie's OR were they tapping Trump and his people and got all three calls?

That said it does not matter who Flynn was talking to Flynn's name should have NEVER been unmasked without a FISA warrant according to most former intel officers interviewed by FOX. Most say the fact it was unmasked and leaked is a FELONY and needs to be found out who did the authorization of the unmasking and who leaked it. As if they can unmask Flynn's name they can do it to any one including businessmen working in foreign countries that don't want their personal information sold to the highest bidder IE their competition. Can you imagine the money you could make if you have the transcript of a multimillion dollar deal made with a foreign company by a big corporation. Say you sold that info to a group and they bought stock in the company just before the deal was made. The money you could charge for that info might be endless to the right person. It needs to be investigated and stopped even if they have to check everyone's domestic and foreign accounts and see who is make some large deposits on a government salary.
 

Steve

Well-known member
Tam said:
Problem with that is they also have transcripts of Trump's conversations with two foreign leaders, were they also wiretapping Mexico and the Aussie's OR were they tapping Trump and his people and got all three calls?

I know that,.. but the liberals can't seem to understand the logic, nor the legalities of this fine mess team Obama made in the final hours of his eight year coffee break..
 
Top