• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

obama = Hitler ??

Help Support Ranchers.net:


Well-known member
Mar 17, 2005
Reaction score
Even the Huffington Post confirms this.
> >
> > This is a new law signed by all congressmen except three. Ron Paul was one of the ones who voted against this bill.
> >
> > New law makes it illegal to protest in Obama's presence
> >
> >
> > This means that, wherever Obama is at, you do not have a right to ask him anything you want to. His secret service can have you arrested, fined, and imprisoned for more than a YEAR if you ask him something he doesn't like. Sound like he's more like Hitler than Lincoln to you?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Guess you've probably heard about this, but sending it on anyway. It's probably the scariest thing this guy has done yet.
> >
> >
> > Are you aware of this new law, signed by "Obama" in early March 2012?
> >
> >
> http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=7SGWH3kirzg&vq=medium
So now they are destroying your rights of Freedom of speech. what's next will everyone have to bow and kiss his friggin feet or risk being arrested for disrespect of "THE ONE"? When in the sam h*ll will the Republicans in Congress smarten up and stop the threat of Peoples rights? :roll:
HR 347 is a modification from Senate bill S. 1794, which restricted people from entering or blocking public areas that have been closed off by Secret Service while a person under their protection is passing through. The law also included major public events, such as the Inaguration and Presidential campaigns.

The new law, which passed the Republican House with a vote of 399-3, extends the original law by adding more protected areas within Washington D.C, and removing the word "willfully," from the paragraph stating that protesters can be prosecuted if they enter the area "willfully and knowingly."

Representative Tom Rooney's (R-Fla. ) the man responsible for introducing the bill to the House communication director dismissed concerns that the bill violates civil liberties by saying, that the protests against H.R. 347 are, "a whole lot of kerfuffle over nothing. This (HR 347) doesn't affect anyone's right to protest anywhere at any time. Ever. " He went on to say that, "… right now it's not a federal violation to jump the fence and run across the White House lawn, this bill makes it a federal violation."

Sounds reasonable to me...If law enforcement close off an area- it should be illegal to enter it..

Another Repubublican conspiracy to take over the world- just like the conspiracy when the Congress without any objections voted unanimously to certify Obama as the President of the United States... Big rightwing/leftwing combined conspiracy.. :roll:
Yep "a whole lot of kerfuffle over nothing"-- but wingnuts can make it into a massive conspiracy... :p :roll: :lol: :lol:
How Big a Deal is H.R. 347, That "Criminalizing Protest" Bill?

Posted by Gabe Rottman, Washington Legislative Office at 11:56am

Recent days have seen significant concern about an unassuming bill with an unassuming name: the "Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011." The bill, H.R. 347, has been variously described as making the First Amendment illegal or criminalizing the Occupy protests.

The truth is more mundane, but the issues raised are still of major significance for the First Amendment.

It's important to note — contrary to some reports — that H.R. 347 doesn't create any new crimes, or directly apply to the Occupy protests. The bill slightly rewrites a short trespass law, originally passed in 1971 and amended a couple of times since, that covers areas subject to heightened Secret Service security measures.

These restricted areas include locations where individuals under Secret Service protection are temporarily located, and certain large special events like a presidential inauguration. They can also include large public events like the Super Bowl and the presidential nominating conventions (troublingly, the Department of Homeland Security has significant discretion in designating what qualifies as one of these special events).

The original statute, unchanged by H.R. 347,made certain conduct with respect to these restricted areas a crime, including simple trespass, actions in or near the restricted area that would "disrupt the orderly conduct of Government," and blocking the entrance or exit to the restricted area.

H.R. 347 did make one noteworthy change, which may make it easier for the Secret Service to overuse or misuse the statute to arrest lawful protesters.

Without getting too much into the weeds, most crimes require the government to prove a certain state of mind. Under the original language of the law, you had to act "willfully and knowingly" when committing the crime. In short, you had to know your conduct was illegal. Under H.R. 347, you will simply need to act "knowingly," which here would mean that you know you're in a restricted area, but not necessarily that you're committing a crime.

Any time the government lowers the intent requirement, it makes it easier for a prosecutor to prove her case, and it gives law enforcement more discretion when enforcing the law. To be sure, this is of concern to the ACLU. We will monitor the implementation of H.R. 347 for any abuse or misuse.

Also, while H.R. 347, on its own, is only of incremental importance, it could be misused as part of a larger move by the Secret Service and others to suppress lawful protest by relegating it to particular locations at a public event. These "free speech zones" are frequently used to target certain viewpoints or to keep protesters away from the cameras. Although H.R. 347 doesn't directly address free speech zones, it is part of the set of laws that make this conduct possible, and should be seen in this context.

Rest assured we'll be keeping an eye on how this law will be interpreted and used by law enforcement — especially in light of the coming elections.

Even the wingnuts at the ACLU are not getting overly excited on this one as this is a law that has existed since 1971-- and the only thing the resolution does is give prosecutors an easier task of convicting those breaking the law..
hypocritexposer said:
What part of "obama is a moderate" do you guys not understand?

Sounds pretty bipartisan to me...Only 3 in the House voted against it- and it passed the Senate by unanimous consent with no one objecting to it..

And the original rule was passed in 1971 and signed into law by President Richard Nixon...

Yep- a massive 40 year in the planning bipartisan conspiracy...Everyone better move to Canada !! :roll: :lol: :lol:
Oldtimer said:
hypocritexposer said:
What part of "obama is a moderate" do you guys not understand?

Sounds pretty bipartisan to me...Only 3 in the House voted against it- and it passed the Senate by unanimous consent with no one objecting to it..

And the original rule was passed in 1971 and signed into law by President Richard Nixon...

Yep- a massive 40 year planned bipartisan conspiracy...Everyone better move to Canada !! :roll: :lol: :lol:

:lol: :roll:
when you get done sucking off the Big Nig, perhaps you will see that he really is not very good for this nation...but I guess if a family makes it's living at the teat of the welfare system, I can see how you would be so infatuated with Obama...
Ahh, don't worry so much, Jiggsy. At the end of the day, the ONLY shovel ready job Obamanure will have ever created is for Old Whiskey Breath, who will be left to shovel all the horse manure that TWAP left us during his one-term failed Presidency. That in itself oughta keep the old alky busy until he dies, but then we know it was all Bush's fault! :wink: :roll: :lol:
jigs said:
when you get done sucking off the Big Nig, perhaps you will see that he really is not very good for this nation...but I guess if a family makes it's living at the teat of the welfare system, I can see how you would be so infatuated with Obama...

Now that he's retired, he's looking for the "obama bucks"
Well that is what we get for looking to the Huffington Post as a creditable news source. :wink: But what I really find comical (to quote Oldtimer) is that the Occupiers are the ones throwing the biggest fit over this new bill but yet Oldtimer thinks it is no big deal. The other thing I find comical is the Republicans introduced this bill and OLDTIMER SEES IT AS NO BIG DEAL. How long has it been since Oldtimer has agreed with the Republicans on anything. :?

That's OK Oldtimer we won't hold it against you. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Obama thinks like Hitler does and worships the same god (Zeus, Baal, Brahma, Apollyon, Osiris, Nimrod aka Satan) he did. You have to study the Mystery Religions of Babylon ( I found Milton Wm Cooper's transcript on scribd.com interesting) and read Manley Hall's book Secret Destiny of America and start piecing it together. I guarantee you didn't hear the same in your school history book. Our science is to the point where they can clone the nephilim or even Cain for that matter.... I used to think the Bible meant in the verse that says God shortenend the days less there be no flesh left that people were killing each other so badly, but now I wonder if it isn't that because they try to change everyone into nephilim (Genesis 6 and Enoch). That's why God flooded the earth was to get rid of the nephilim because it had become such a wicked place. Noah was a godly man but his bloodline was pure, there weren't any nephilim in his bloodline. The bible already tells that in the end times it will be like the days of Noah...... and man is made in God's image and the devil can't stand God, so he will change man's image........well, science can recreate the nephilim and say they are aliens ..... so Wm Cooper's book , "Behold a Pale Horse" makes sense to me now when you understand ufo's and aliens are demonic. Chuck Missler has also talked about this. And I admit its difficult to piece it together because there's as much disinformation as there is information but you take it back to the Holy Bible and read God's word and throw out what doesn't match up with the Bible. You have to remember the Antichrist can only arise as God allows him to and he will only allow him to progress so that he fulfills Bible Prophecy exactly.

Maybe we should look at some things that happened: this is from the book by Tom Horn, Apollyon Rising 2012 (this is a very interesting book and is on scribd as well)

Four days later on January 5, 2009, the chorus call for a New World Order was ramped up by former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger while on the floor of theNew York Stock Exchange. A reporter for CNBC asked Kissinger what he thought Barack Obama's first actions as President should be in light of the global financial crises. He answered, "I think that his task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period, when really a New World Order can be created." Kissinger followed on January 13th, with an opinion piece distributed by Tribune Media Services titled The Chance for a New World Order. Addressing the international financial crises inherited by Barack Obama, Kissinger discussed the need for an international political order (world government) to rise and govern a new international monetary and trade system. "The nadir of the existing international financial system coincides with simultaneous political crises around the globe," he wrote. "The alternative to a new international order is chaos." Kissinger went on to highlight Obama's extraordinary impact on the "imagination of humanity," calling it"an important element in shaping a New World Order." [2] Kissinger—aRockefeller functionary and member of the Bilderberg group and TrilateralCommission who routinely turns up in lists among senior members of the Illuminati—peppered his article with key phrases from Masonic dogma, including the comment about the "alternative to a new international order is chaos," a clear reference to "Ordo ab Chao" from Ancient Craft Masonry, a reference to the doctrine of "Order out of Chaos." Like the mythical Phoenix firebird, Kissinger visualized the opportunity for a New World Order to be engineered from the ashes of current global chaos, exactly the point he had made years earlier at the Bilderberger meeting in Evian, France, May 21, 1991 when describing how the world could be manipulated into willingly embracing global government. He said:"Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to
restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government." [3]

----- some more from the book and this wasn't on the mainstreams news media..................................

Though there is no way of knowing what the Presidential Oath of Office deeply means to Obama or whether the blunder and redo of the swearing in ceremony was anything more than an accident, the unprecedented gaffe was suspicious to some as possibly representing important hidden meaning. Misgivings over it were additionally compounded when reflected against other curious activitiesand declarations by Barack Obama, which most of the media missed, downplayed,or simply refused to report on, that strongly connected his emergence with occult mythology identified in the Bible as both prophetic and demonic.An extraordinary example of this was when Obama gave his speech in Berlin,Germany, on July 24th, 2008, titled "The World that Stands as One." More than a few students of occult history took notice of the symbolism and location of the event, even causing some who until then had rejected any "antichrist" labels hurled at Obama to reconsider their position. This included respected Catholic writer Michael O'Brien, best known for his apocalyptic novel Father Elijah. O'Brien had received numerous letters and emails from subscribers and visitors to his website wondering if Obama was the Antichrist. At first O'Brien wrote that this was not possible. Then a friend that had seen Obama's speech in Berlin called him, talking about how mesmerizing the speech was and that an announcer over German radio had said: "We have just heard the next President of the United States… and the future President of the World." By now Obama was conveying an unusual likeness to the Antichrist character of his novel. After watching the Berlin speech several times for himself, O'Brien sent out a newsletter in which he admitted that, while he still doubted Obama was the prophesied ruler of the end times, he had come to believe he was "a carrier of a deadly moral virus, indeed a kind of anti-apostle spreading concepts and agendas that are not only anti-Christ but anti-human as well." O'Brien finally conceded Obama could be instrumental in ushering in the dreaded Great Tribulation period, and worse, that he was "of the spirit of Antichrist." [34] After Obama's term of office was underway, O'Brien pointed out

the numerous foreign and domestic problems Obama was facing, including wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the possibility of a new war with Iran, and issues related to the crumbling financial systems, saying these obstacles could overshadow Obama and lead to his defeat in the next presidential election. O'Brien then added in what was a clear reference to the coming of Antichrist, "Alternatively, he could become the'Great Facilitator,' negotiator, peacemaker, working marvels throughout the world ashe moves from one seemingly unsolvable problem to another." [35]Because it is true that any significant public political event requires both forethought and symbolic meaning, the location where Obama gave his Berlin speech in front of Berlin's Victory Column contributed to O'Brien's conclusions.The site was offensive to educated Germans as well as to Christians and Jews because of its ties to Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. It was nevertheless oddly appropriate, for it was upon this exact location that Hitler had planned to enthrone himself in the Welthauptstadt Germania—the new "World Capital" upon winning World War II.During the 1930s, Hitler commissioned Albert Speer "the first architect of the Third Reich" to design the new capital. As part of the plans, the "Siegessäule" or BerlinVictory Column—a 226-foot monument topped by a golden winged figure representing Borussia, the female personification of Prussia, and Victoria, the cult goddess of military victory—was removed from its location in front of the Reichstag building in 1939 and relocated to its current location in the Tiergarten, a 495 acre park in the middle of Berlin where Obama gave his speech in front of the Nazi symbol.Rainer Brüderle, deputy leader of the liberal political party Free Democrats in Germany complained to the newspaper Bild am Sonntag: "The Siegessäule in Berlinwas moved to where it is now by Adolf Hitler. He saw it as a symbol of German superiority and of the victorious wars against Denmark, Austria and France." This represented a serious question In Brüderle's mind as to "whether Barack Obama was advised correctly in his choice of the Siegessäule as the site to hold a speechon his vision for a more cooperative world." [36] Another German politician named Andreas Schockenhoff was equally disturbed, saying, "It is a problematic symbol."[37]Evidently it was not problematic for Obama, who stood in front of it and saluted the German audience in a way eerily similar to what Adolf Hitler used to do,followed by thousands returning the salute, which is against German law. When Obama ended his speech in front of the war goddess, he said, "With an eye toward the future, with resolve in our hearts, let us remember this history, and answer our destiny, and remake the world once again." This is exactly what Hitler had promised to do and exactly where he had planned to memorialize it.Of greater significance and not far from where Obama delivered his rousing speech,is the Great Altar of Zeus in the Pergamon Museum. According to several reports,

Obama visited the Great Altar while in Berlin, which is especially important given what he did on returning to the United States. Before we examine Obama's revealing actions, consider carefully what the Bible says about the Altar of Zeus in the letter to the church in Pergamos (Pergamum, Pergamon)."And to the angel of the church in Pergamos write; These things saith he which hath the sharp sword with two edges; I know thy works, and where thou dwellest, even where Satan's seat is: and thou holdest fast my name, and has not denied my faith, even in those days wherein Antipas was my faithful martyr, who was slain among you, where Satan dwelleth" (Rev. 2:12-13).In the Greek, the phrase "where Satan's seat is" literally means, "where a throne to Satan is." Scholars identify this throne or 'seat' as the Great Altar of Zeus that existed in Pergamos at that time. So important was the worship of Zeus in ancient Pergamos that perpetual sacrifices were offered to him upon the towering and famous 40-foot high altar. Antipas, the first leader and martyr of the early Christian church is believed to have been slain on this altar, slowly roasting to death inside the statue of a bull, the symbol and companion of Zeus. The phrase in Revelation 2:13 "wherein Antipas was my faithful martyr, who was slain among you, where Satan dwelleth" is considered a citation of this event.Approximately two-thousand years after Revelation 2:13 was written, German archeologists removed the massive altar of Zeus from the ruins of Pergamos and took it to Berlin, where it was restored as the centerpiece of the Pergamon Museum. It is here that Hitler first adored it, later building an outdoor replica of it from which he gave a series of speeches that mesmerized many Germans."Fast forward about another 75 years," says blogger El Gallo. "Another charismatic young politician mesmerizes huge German crowds with a rousing speech in Berlin. Barack Hussein Obama…. [and] did Barack Obama visit… the Great Altar of Zeus…? Presumably he did." [38]Whether Obama received inspiration from the throne of Satan while in Berlin or not, what he did next was astonishing. Upon returning to the United States, he immediately commissioned the construction of a Greek-columned stage from which he made his acceptance speech for his party's nomination. Because Greek temples such as those built to honor Zeus were thought to house the patron deity, the GOP ridiculed Obama, mocking him as playing Zeus of "Mount Olympus" and accusing his supporters of "kneeling" before the "Temple of Obama." The New York Post ran an enlightening Convention Special supplement on August 28th, 2008 with the telling headline: 'O' MY GOD: DEMS ERECT OBAMA TEMPLE blazoned across the front cover. But it was not until blogger Joel Richardson pointed out how the design of Obama's stage was a dead ringer for the Great Altar of Zeus [39] that Obama's campaign managers tried to explain away the design as being a conglomeration representing the portico of the White House with the U.S. capital

building. "But experts agreed with Richardson," Gallo wrote, "it was a replica of the Great Altar of Pergamum." [40]Thus, incredibly, like Hitler, Obama had honored the goddess Victoria with his presence before ordering a replica of the biblical throne of Satan built, upon which he accepted his date with destiny.A final troubling disclosure at the conclusion of this entry may cast light on why Obama seemed fascinated with such anti-Christian symbolism in the lead-up to his election victory. A Hadith (tradition) sacred to Shiite Islam from the 17th century contains a prophecy from Ali ibn Abi-Talib, which predicts that just before the return of the Mahdi (the end-times redeemer of Islam), a "tall black man will assume the reins of government in the West." This leader will command "the strongest army on earth" and will bear "a clear sign" from the third imam,Hussein. The prophecy concludes that: "Shiites should have no doubt that he is with us."Does this Islamic prophecy identify Obama as the "promised warrior" who comes to help the savior of Shiite Muslims conquer the world? Amir Taheri asked this very question for Forbes Magazine in October, 2008, pointing out how "Obama's first and second names—Barack Hussein—mean 'the blessing of Hussein' in Arabic and Persian" while his "family name, Obama, written in the Persian alphabet, reads OBa Ma, which means 'he is with us,' the magic formula in Majlisi's tradition." [41]Leap forward to 2009, and Barack Hussein Obama on June 4 gave an unprecedented speech to the Muslim world from Cairo, Egypt declaring that he is launching a new era between the United States and the Muslim world. For the first time, Obama was forthright about his Muslim heritage and stated that the United States—which he is on record as saying is "no longer a Christian nation"—is now"one of the largest Muslim countries in the world."

Latest posts