• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Obama Seizes Individually Owned Business

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Is this the hope and change you voted for? Government seizing private business? This is not hope. It’s the wanton destruction of the very thing that makes us a free people, the Constitution of the United States. It is change however…. And it is looking like those states who are even now asserting their 10th Amendment rights are right on the money. “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” The Federal Government has zero authority to do what it is doing. None whatsoever.

Tyranny is now the USA's reality, with Totalitarianism as its form of government.
Obama Seizes Individually Owned Business
Sher Zieve Bio
Email Article
By Sher Zieve Thursday, May 21, 2009

This just gets worse and worse, folks. Except for a few of us, no one out there seems to be reporting the facts. Fear of the Dictator Obama (he appears to be more like Stalin than Hugo Chavez) is on the rise. Soon to be Obama-owned (under the cover of his government-takeovers) private sector business executives, workers, small business owners and even elected Congressional representatives and senators--from both sides of the aisle--are running scared of the despot-usurper.

As it becomes more obvious that the Obama is--in fact--destroying the country to rebuild it in his own image (with all of us now working for him--not ourselves and/or our families), more and more people are cowering in what they hope will be the cover of shadows. Every day, Obama is on television--at least once/day--telling us what he is and will be doing. These items include unconstitutional activities and others that are patently against the laws of the United States of America. For example, under the US Constitution neither he nor any other POTUS has the authority to seize and nationalize private industry. But, he has. Obama does not have the authority to seize any private business. But, he seems to be doing just that.

Obama has seized both General Motors and Chrysler and essentially handed them to the UAW. He is closing down multiple Chrysler agencies. Jim Anderer owns--soon to be past-tense--a highly successful and high-performing Chrysler agency on Long Island. Anderer has been advised that his agency is going to be seized by the new ownership--as we already know this is Barack Hussein Obama. Other Chrysler agencies on Long Island are documented to not be fairing nearly as well. However, many of them--the “Obama-okayed” ones--are still planned to be in business.

Despite multiple letters, emails and phones calls, Anderer has been given no explanation as to why his dealership was targeted. On Neil Cavuto’s show, Anderer said “They won’t give us a solid explanation. They come up with all these reasons, but none of them seem to make sense” and “but I think there is a lot of favored dealers, there is some collusion.” Anderer continued with: “This is insanity. The government is stealing my business. Well, I cannot accept that as a patriotic American. I was raised in this country to believe that if I work hard and I achieve what I was going after—and I did! I did it! I got it, and now all of a sudden because, you know, we have a president who pushes Chrysler into bankruptcy and puts all of the UAW workers out...? Didn’t have to. Maybe some would have to go out but not all of them, okay. This doesn’t happen in America. This is still America, I think. I mean, this isn’t Stalinist Russia. This is not Nazi Germany where the troopers say you’re out and their buddies are in. That’s what I’m faced with.” The problem here is that America has become a Stalinist Amerika.

The next story of a Chrysler dealership being stolen from its rightful owner is that of George C. Joseph--the sole owner of Sunshine Dodge-Isuzu in Melbourne, FL. Joseph writes: “On Thursday, May 14, 2009 I was notified that my Dodge franchise, that we purchased, will be taken away from my family on June 9, 2009 without compensation and given to another dealer at no cost to them. My new vehicle inventory consists of 125 vehicles with a financed balance of 3 million dollars. This inventory becomes impossible to sell with no factory incentives beyond June 9, 2009. Without the Dodge franchise we can no longer sell a new Dodge as “new,” nor will we be able to do any warranty service work. Additionally, my Dodge parts inventory, (approximately $300,000.) is virtually worthless without the ability to perform warranty service. There is no offer from Chrysler to buy back the vehicles or parts inventory.”

The above are only two stories of a likely growing number of businesses that are now being stolen out from under their rightful owners. The full weight and power of the US federal government is now being brought to bear against We-the-People. Along with stealing our money by taking over the banks, Obama is now also openly stealing the livelihoods from the American people. It is both against the law and demonstrates--proves--that the USA is now under a full and expanding dictatorship! With no one doing anything to stop Obama and his power-mad minions, it will get far worse.

People are now finally asking--that is screaming--"What has happened to America?” and George C. Joseph writes: “HOW IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CAN THIS HAPPEN?” It happens when our lawmakers ignore the laws of the land when they are no longer convenient to their personal purposes and ambitions. It happens when people stop paying attention to the business of our country and our elected officials. It happened when people refused to listen to what Obama actually said, in favor of granting him rock-idol status. It happens when people do nothing to stop it. Tyranny can only prosper when We-the-People allow a dictator to rise up and take over.

The USA and its people are coming close to being totally owned and operated by Obama--who is now going against and bypassing his own leftist Congress. It is being reported that Obama will announce, today, that he will not only close Gitmo--which was voted down Wednesday (90-6) by both Senate Democrats and Republicans--but, WILL release some of the terrorists into the US population.

Tyranny is now the USA’s reality, with Totalitarianism as its form of government. It has arrived and may prove to be the fastest turnaround ever from the most free of all countries to the most oppressed. Was this the change you voted for? Was it?

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/11287
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
In the hearings yesterday- several of the Republican Congressmen were telling Geithner they think the government should grab total control of AIG- and some of the other banking/financial/lending institutions that are riding on the skin of their teeth only by TARP/Federal money- because they were much more in the hole than the Bush boys let on.....

In fact I watched several that said if he would bring back the bill to "nationalize" some of these institutions they believed it would pass the Senate by a 95-4 vote and the House by the same majority... :???:

You're going to working for Obama yet there Sandhusker :wink:

"Yes Sir Mr. Obama- thank you for my paycheck"--eh :???: :wink:

Say "Thank You- Mr Bush"... :wink:
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
In the hearings yesterday- several of the Republican Congressmen were telling Geithner they think the government should grab total control of AIG- and some of the other banking/financial/lending institutions that are riding on the skin of their teeth only by TARP/Federal money- because they were much more in the hole than the Bush boys let on.....

In fact I watched several that said if he would bring back the bill to "nationalize" some of these institutions they believed it would pass the Senate by a 95-4 vote and the House by the same majority... :???:

You're going to working for Obama yet there Sandhusker :wink:

"Yes Sir Mr. Obama- thank you for my paycheck"--eh :???: :wink:

Say "Thank You- Mr Bush"... :wink:

That's real nice, but how about commenting on the article......
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Sandhusker said:
Oldtimer said:
In the hearings yesterday- several of the Republican Congressmen were telling Geithner they think the government should grab total control of AIG- and some of the other banking/financial/lending institutions that are riding on the skin of their teeth only by TARP/Federal money- because they were much more in the hole than the Bush boys let on.....

In fact I watched several that said if he would bring back the bill to "nationalize" some of these institutions they believed it would pass the Senate by a 95-4 vote and the House by the same majority... :???:

You're going to working for Obama yet there Sandhusker :wink:

"Yes Sir Mr. Obama- thank you for my paycheck"--eh :???: :wink:

Say "Thank You- Mr Bush"... :wink:

That's real nice, but how about commenting on the article......

I did----- this new Republicanism now think these companies that the government has had to put money into should be owned by the share of money the taxpayer put in.....In the case of AIG- right now we have should have 80% ownership is what they are saying...

Geithner opposes outright "nationalization"-but rather enough control to guarantee the taxpayers money---but said he may be open to the Republicans ideas if the Bush Bust economy gets worse...

Isn't the "nationalization" they now support- the same as the "socialism" you whined before about....

GW sat this country back 100 years..... :(
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Geithner opposes outright "nationalization"-but rather enough control to guarantee the taxpayers money---but said he may be open to the Republicans ideas if the Bush Bust economy gets worse...

How much did the taxpayers get back out of Chrysler? Was that a Bush deal too?
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Sandhusker said:
Oldtimer said:
In the hearings yesterday- several of the Republican Congressmen were telling Geithner they think the government should grab total control of AIG- and some of the other banking/financial/lending institutions that are riding on the skin of their teeth only by TARP/Federal money- because they were much more in the hole than the Bush boys let on.....

In fact I watched several that said if he would bring back the bill to "nationalize" some of these institutions they believed it would pass the Senate by a 95-4 vote and the House by the same majority... :???:

You're going to working for Obama yet there Sandhusker :wink:

"Yes Sir Mr. Obama- thank you for my paycheck"--eh :???: :wink:

Say "Thank You- Mr Bush"... :wink:

That's real nice, but how about commenting on the article......

I did----- this new Republicanism now think these companies that the government has had to put money into should be owned by the share of money the taxpayer put in.....In the case of AIG- right now we have should have 80% ownership is what they are saying...

Geithner opposes outright "nationalization"-but rather enough control to guarantee the taxpayers money---but said he may be open to the Republicans ideas if the Bush Bust economy gets worse...

Isn't the "nationalization" they now support- the same as the "socialism" you whined before about....

GW sat this country back 100 years..... :(
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
hypocritexposer said:
Geithner opposes outright "nationalization"-but rather enough control to guarantee the taxpayers money---but said he may be open to the Republicans ideas if the Bush Bust economy gets worse...

How much did the taxpayers get back out of Chrysler? Was that a Bush deal too?

Like he told Congress-- the autoplant deals are not done with- as they change daily with the worsening of the Bush Bust- and they still must be approved by the bankruptcy courts- but as set up now- the US government/taxpayer will have a major shareholder/BOD involvement to try and protect their investment....
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Congress is now saying they were misled by Obama on the Chrysler deal. What they were told and how it is evolving are 2 different things.

Much like most of his speeches!
 

Faster horses

Well-known member
What do you expect from a man who has done nothing but be
a community organizer? Why would anyone think he would
know anything about managing a business.
:shock:

And closing dealerships is absolutely ridiculous; and
very sad. Small towns that lose them are going to find out
about the trickle down effect. The car dealers contribute greatly
to the community.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. granted a rare approval to a program that will allow GMAC to raise money cheaply and take on lending for Chrysler. The Federal Reserve had to waive a rule separating banking and commerce that would have prevented GMAC, which just became a bank holding company, from lending to GM customers because the auto maker is a major shareholder in GMAC.

According to the Post, "The decision by regulators to grant these waivers demonstrates the lengths the government is going to prop up the nation's auto industry." Well, Ford Motors is also part of the auto indutry, but it doesn't appear that Ford Credit is going to benefit from this program, so it's not the auto industry that's getting breaks, it's the now-government-un car companies.

For the Fed to make an exception to its rule separating banks and commercial enterprises would not be unprecedented. The Fed took such a step in its original decision to bring GMAC under the agency's umbrella and it made similar moves involving other financial companies.

So the relevent precedent the Post can cite is the one involving GMAC. I know there are space limitations in a newspaper, but it's hardly reasonable to claim as precedent a decision involving the same company now getting another waiver.

Moreover, the Post notes that up until now, the FDIC had been reluctant to give GMAC access because of its shaky finances. It doesn't even address the possibility that the waiver was influenced by Washington's newly-acquired stake in the car companies.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/joshua-sharf/2009/05/21/fed-changes-rules-benefit-government-carmakers-washington-post-cover-0
 

TexasBred

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
hypocritexposer said:
Geithner opposes outright "nationalization"-but rather enough control to guarantee the taxpayers money---but said he may be open to the Republicans ideas if the Bush Bust economy gets worse...

How much did the taxpayers get back out of Chrysler? Was that a Bush deal too?

Like he told Congress-- the autoplant deals are not done with- as they change daily with the worsening of the Bush Bust- and they still must be approved by the bankruptcy courts- but as set up now- the US government/taxpayer will have a major shareholder/BOD involvement to try and protect their investment....

OT you have taken the bait as well as the hook, line and sinker. Have another cup of kool-Aid with it.
 
Top