hypocritexposer
Well-known member
I guess they didn't tell him what he wanted to hear...
"Lower regulations and taxes"
"Lower regulations and taxes"
hypocritexposer said:I guess they didn't tell him what he wanted to hear...
"Lower regulations and taxes"
But doubt now hangs over the question of whether the council’s original charter will be extended beyond its two-year term, with a White House aide telling The Hill that it “was only intended” to last that long.
The executive order that created the council states, “The [jobs council] shall meet regularly” and it “shall terminate 2 years after the date of this order unless extended by the president.”
Oldtimer said:hypocritexposer said:I guess they didn't tell him what he wanted to hear...
"Lower regulations and taxes"
or could it be because that's the time period it was set up to exist for :???:
But doubt now hangs over the question of whether the council’s original charter will be extended beyond its two-year term, with a White House aide telling The Hill that it “was only intended” to last that long.
The executive order that created the council states, “The [jobs council] shall meet regularly” and it “shall terminate 2 years after the date of this order unless extended by the president.”
Oldtimer said:hypocritexposer said:I guess they didn't tell him what he wanted to hear...
"Lower regulations and taxes"
or could it be because that's the time period it was set up to exist for :???:
But doubt now hangs over the question of whether the council’s original charter will be extended beyond its two-year term, with a White House aide telling The Hill that it “was only intended” to last that long.
The executive order that created the council states, “The [jobs council] shall meet regularly” and it “shall terminate 2 years after the date of this order unless extended by the president.”
Oldtimer said:The executive order that created the council states, “The [jobs council] shall meet regularly” and it “shall terminate 2 years after the date of this order unless extended by the president.”
Tam said:Oldtimer said:The executive order that created the council states, “The [jobs council] shall meet regularly” and it “shall terminate 2 years after the date of this order unless extended by the president.”
Obama could have extended it but he didn't Oldtimer WHY? Did he figure he had created enough jobs and didn't want to risk getting any more people an actual job and off the government welfare rolls/Democrat voters list? Like I have said before the more people on the GOVERNMENT TIT the longer the Dems keep control of the purse strings. Those living on Government handouts are not going to chance voting Republican and having them cut into their gravy train while attempting to bring the US back to fiscal sanity.
I'm guessing with No Jobs Counsel, Obama doesn't have to take the hit for their lack of job creation or take the hit for his jobs counsel chairmen Jeffery Imelt sending more GE jobs to China.
Oldtimer said:Tam said:Oldtimer said:The executive order that created the council states, “The [jobs council] shall meet regularly” and it “shall terminate 2 years after the date of this order unless extended by the president.”
Obama could have extended it but he didn't Oldtimer WHY? Did he figure he had created enough jobs and didn't want to risk getting any more people an actual job and off the government welfare rolls/Democrat voters list? Like I have said before the more people on the GOVERNMENT TIT the longer the Dems keep control of the purse strings. Those living on Government handouts are not going to chance voting Republican and having them cut into their gravy train while attempting to bring the US back to fiscal sanity.
I'm guessing with No Jobs Counsel, Obama doesn't have to take the hit for their lack of job creation or take the hit for his jobs counsel chairmen Jeffery Imelt sending more GE jobs to China.
This is comical... Usually conservatives are against more committees, commissions, bureaucrats, and more big government spending on study groups- BUT
since this is something Obama is choosing not to continue- they are all for it... :roll: :wink::lol:
Closet Liberals.... :???: :lol:
hypocritexposer said:Oldtimer said:Tam said:Obama could have extended it but he didn't Oldtimer WHY? Did he figure he had created enough jobs and didn't want to risk getting any more people an actual job and off the government welfare rolls/Democrat voters list? Like I have said before the more people on the GOVERNMENT TIT the longer the Dems keep control of the purse strings. Those living on Government handouts are not going to chance voting Republican and having them cut into their gravy train while attempting to bring the US back to fiscal sanity.
I'm guessing with No Jobs Counsel, Obama doesn't have to take the hit for their lack of job creation or take the hit for his jobs counsel chairmen Jeffery Imelt sending more GE jobs to China.
This is comical... Usually conservatives are against more committees, commissions, bureaucrats, and more big government spending on study groups- BUT
since this is something Obama is choosing not to continue- they are all for it... :roll: :wink::lol:
Closet Liberals.... :???: :lol:
Who in this thread said they were for it?
Oldtimer said:Tam said:Oldtimer said:The executive order that created the council states, “The [jobs council] shall meet regularly” and it “shall terminate 2 years after the date of this order unless extended by the president.”
Obama could have extended it but he didn't Oldtimer WHY? Did he figure he had created enough jobs and didn't want to risk getting any more people an actual job and off the government welfare rolls/Democrat voters list? Like I have said before the more people on the GOVERNMENT TIT the longer the Dems keep control of the purse strings. Those living on Government handouts are not going to chance voting Republican and having them cut into their gravy train while attempting to bring the US back to fiscal sanity.
I'm guessing with No Jobs Counsel, Obama doesn't have to take the hit for their lack of job creation or take the hit for his jobs counsel chairmen Jeffery Imelt sending more GE jobs to China.
This is comical... Usually conservatives are against more committees, commissions, bureaucrats, and more big government spending on study groups- BUT
since this is something Obama is choosing not to continue- they are all for it... :roll: :wink::lol:
Closet Liberals.... :???: :lol:
Bullhauler said:I guess hypo and whitewing didn't read tam's latest rant. Don't feel bad about it though guys I seldom read her rants either.
Bullhauler said:I guess hypo and whitewing didn't read tam's latest rant. Don't feel bad about it though guys I seldom read her rants either.
Tam said:Oldtimer said:Tam said:Obama could have extended it but he didn't Oldtimer WHY? Did he figure he had created enough jobs and didn't want to risk getting any more people an actual job and off the government welfare rolls/Democrat voters list? Like I have said before the more people on the GOVERNMENT TIT the longer the Dems keep control of the purse strings. Those living on Government handouts are not going to chance voting Republican and having them cut into their gravy train while attempting to bring the US back to fiscal sanity.
I'm guessing with No Jobs Counsel, Obama doesn't have to take the hit for their lack of job creation or take the hit for his jobs counsel chairmen Jeffery Imelt sending more GE jobs to China.
This is comical... Usually conservatives are against more committees, commissions, bureaucrats, and more big government spending on study groups- BUT
since this is something Obama is choosing not to continue- they are all for it... :roll: :wink::lol:
Closet Liberals.... :???: :lol:
Mind showing us where I said I agreed with the Jobs counsel that was headed up by the biggest offshore employer in the US? :?
Good jobs are not created BY THE GOVERNMENT via a Jobs Counsel, they are created when the government gets the hell out of private Business's way and allow them to do their jobs. Any job created by the government is paid for by tax payer money collect off the back of those with a job in the private sector. :roll:
Bullhauler said:I guess hypo and whitewing didn't read tam's latest rant. Don't feel bad about it though guys I seldom read her rants either.
Oldtimer said:Tam said:Oldtimer said:This is comical... Usually conservatives are against more committees, commissions, bureaucrats, and more big government spending on study groups- BUT
since this is something Obama is choosing not to continue- they are all for it... :roll: :wink::lol:
Closet Liberals.... :???: :lol:
Mind showing us where I said I agreed with the Jobs counsel that was headed up by the biggest offshore employer in the US? :?
Good jobs are not created BY THE GOVERNMENT via a Jobs Counsel, they are created when the government gets the hell out of private Business's way and allow them to do their jobs. Any job created by the government is paid for by tax payer money collect off the back of those with a job in the private sector. :roll:
So what you're saying is that you were just ranting and whining to be ranting and whining about something..... :???:
Rightwingernuts- no wonder no one can figure out what they want... :roll: :lol: