• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Obama Voters In Remorse

Mike

Well-known member
In other words, "WE TOLD YOU SO!!!!!!!!"




I don’t recall when I first wrote about Obama telling lies, but it surely must have been early in his first term, if not even earlier in the 2008 campaign. So much of the information about his life was subject to question that it raised my concern.

The way ObamaCare was reamed through a Congress that hadn’t even read the bill put me on full alert. No Republican voted for it.

When you have spent your early years as a journalist as I did you tend to develop a healthy skepticism regarding politicians. There are some very good people who go into politics, but they are vastly outnumbered by those who see it as an easy way to line their pockets. They are the “Eddie Haskell’s” if you are old enough to remember the unctuous character from “Leave It To Beaver.” Glad-handers, back-slappers, and generally smooth talkers.


I was not surprised to read a February 19 article in the Washington Examiner by Paul Paulard. “Poll: Only 79% of Obama voters would vote for him again” was the title and my first response was surprise that that many would still vote for him. Only???

In the poll 71% of the Obama voters now inclined to vote for someone else if they had the chance said they ‘regret’ their vote to reelect the President. So a majority of those taking The Economist/YouGov.com poll would vote for him again, but nearly all regret having done so.

This is a definition of stupidity. I think Obama and his cohorts counted on this high level of indifference to the facts about his first term.





Among the sample of those who would vote for someone else if they could, 100% of the Hispanics said they would and 80% of the whites said they would. However 61% of the blacks said they would still vote for Obama. It strikes me that many in the African-American community are quick to speak out against any perceived prejudice, but when it comes to electing Obama, skin color was a major factor. I suspect that many are unaware of how Obama’s policies have left the black community with soaring numbers of unemployed, far in excess of other racial groups.

Among women 84% said they would vote for someone else, but just 61% men agreed. The most surprising element of the poll was that 55% of Democrats—yes Democrats—wished they had not pulled the lever for Obama and 71% of independents agreed.

All second term Presidents achieve lame duck status at some point when their power to influence the Congress to support their programs kicks in. Arguably, Obama achieved that in 2010 when voters returned power in the House of Representatives to Republicans. The Senate’s response—mostly Majority Leader Harry Reid’s—was to deny any but a few of the many bills generated in the House an opportunity to be debated and voted upon.

The gridlock that resulted and which Obama endlessly decries was created by the Democrats in the Senate.

Efforts by Republicans were rebuffed along with all manner of charges that they were anti-women and anti-immigrant, among other absurdities. When the Republicans tried to get the insane borrowing and spending under control by shutting down the federal government as a response to raising the credit limits, they were portrayed as political cavemen.

Obama is a President who has made it clear that he considers the Congress as an obstacle to his transformation of the nation from a capitalist to a socialist economy in which Big Government functions as the redistributor of taxpayer funding with an emphasis on programs that, like food stamps, added millions to that handout.

It took the launch of ObamaCare to make it abundantly clear how incompetent the Obama administration was and is. The impact on the stagnant job market saw jobs disappear or be turned into part-time, lower-wage positions. People discovered they could not keep their family physician or specialist. Even access to nearby hospitals was denied for some.

We are now being told that being unable to find work is an opportunity to pursue one’s hobbies. Denigrating working for a living is so un-American it is mind-boggling.

The media coverage of Obama’s first term and now the first years of his second protected him against the failure to revive the economy after the 2008 financial crisis. The scandals from Fast and Furious to Benghazi were shunted aside so that the passage of time would diminish their impact. Those who reelected him were not paying attention! Or they just didn’t care.

One can only hope voters are paying attention now and, in the November 2014 midterm elections, they will elect Republican candidates who will have an opportunity—particularly in the Senate—to limit the damage that Obama continues to inflict on the economy and in the area of foreign affairs.

Based on the poll, it took Obama voters over five years, going on six, to conclude they had made a bad choice—but 79% would still vote for him!

That members of Congress, pundits, and others now routinely call Obama a liar is a good sign because he is. But he is also still President of the United States of America and I suspect he doesn’t care what people say about him anymore.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
PolitiFact.com


The PunditFact Truth-O-MeterRulings


The Truth-O-Meter Says:



A YouGov.com poll shows 71 percent of Obama voters regret voting for him.

Bloggers on Tuesday, February 18th, 2014 in conservative blogs



Do 71 percent of Obama voters regret voting for him in 2012? Nope

Pants on Fire!



A claim that 71 percent of Obama voters regretted their vote quickly spread on social media.


For President Barack Obama’s opponents, word of his latest downfall was stunning and welcome.

Headlines and tweets all said just about the same eyebrow-raising thing: "Poll: 71% of Obama supporters 'regret' voting for his reelection." (Those all link to different websites.)

The purported statistic from a YouGov.com poll was the focus of a Washington Examiner post last week that spread quickly through conservative blogs, social media, radio and online forums. Tweets about the news by big guns like Fox & Friends and various accounts with smaller reach were hard to miss.

But the news is wrong. PunditFact will explain why.


The origins of the claim

YouGov.com did not even mention the news about regretful Obama voters in its Feb. 17 writeup of a new poll.

The story that accompanied the poll, headlined "Mitt Romney’s phantom campaign," explored whether Romney is viewed more favorably ahead of the 2016 presidential election given more positive media buzz about a Netflix documentary about him. (The answer, based on their polling data, is not really.)

YouGov polled about 1,000 voters over two days in early February, asking voters of Romney and Obama if they would make the same decision today that they did in November 2012. YouGov found 90 percent of Romney voters would vote for Romney again, while 79 percent of Obama voters said they would stick with Obama.

Of the remaining 2012 Obama voters, 10 percent said they would not vote for him again, and 11 percent said they were unsure.

The 10 percent who would not vote for him again got a follow-up question: Do you regret voting for Obama?

Of 35 people in that group, 25 said yes. That's 71 percent.

So of the people who voted for Obama, 396, 6 percent said they had regrets.

In the eyes of YouGov assistant editor William Jordan, this was not worth mentioning in the original write-up.

"We did not think it surprising that the small number of voters who said they would no longer voted for Obama now regretted voting for him," he said.

Breaking free from the facts

This is where things get messy.

The next day, Washington Examiner columnist Paul Bedard published a story (since updated) that picked up on the people who said they regret voting for Obama.

Bedard wrote that 71 percent of Obama voters regret voting for his re-election.

"Over seven in 10 Obama voters, and 55 percent of Democrats, regret voting for President Obama’s reelection in 2012, according to a new Economist/YouGov.com poll," he wrote. (The Economist has collaborated with YouGov in past polls, but not this one.)

Those words sprung to life, appearing on news aggregator Drudge Report, spreading across Twitter, and landing on sites like TeaParty.org and World Net Daily. It seeped into partisan radio broadcasts, including on Rush Limbaugh’s show, and even a down-the-middle San Diego morning TV show.

Conservative blog Hot Air was the exception. It urged its readers to ignore stories about the 71 percent statistic.

Why? YouGov, while correctly reporting its sample sizes and percentages in its tables, left off an important disclaimer in describing who got question. No one realized it until someone asked about it the day after posting the results.

The description about the "regrets" question should have said, "Asked of those who reported voting for Barack Obama in 2012 but would not vote for him if the election was held again."

Instead it said, "Asked of those who voted for Barack Obama in 2012." That language suggests a sample size of 396 voters, not 35.

"The 71 percent who regretted voting for Obama, which was picked up by various media outlets, is of the 3.5 percent (35 of 999 respondents) of the sample who said they voted for Obama in 2012 and would not vote for him today," Jordan said.

YouGov fixed its truncated filter. Bedard, at the Examiner, rewrote parts of his story and changed the headline to, "Poll: Only 79% of Obama voters would vote for him again."

But there’s no recall button for bad information on the Web. This one spread like a bad chain email.

Our ruling

Reports on blogs, television, radio and Twitter said a YouGov.com poll showed 71 percent of Obama voters regret voting for him.

The number is widly high, based on incomplete wording in a poll report and a less-than-perfect reading of that report by news organizations.

Surveys require a great deal of attention from pollsters and reporters alike, especially ones with political overtones, said Karlyn Bowman, a polling analyst at the conservative American Enterprise Institute. As the sample size shrinks, the margin of error rate expands.

Point being, while the overall YouGov poll had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.8 percentage points, the question about regret would have a much higher margin of error.

"You’ve got to be really careful when you’re looking at subsamples of subsamples of subsamples," Bowman said.

In this case, that didn’t happen. We rate this claim Pants on Fire
.

Another LIE... All the Fact check sites say this is false- based on false info- but still being put out and spread by the Fearmongers and Hatemongers to stir up the mass's ..

Which I tend to believe since earlier this week Obama's approval rating was at 52% according to the conservative Rasmussen polling site....



Mon Feb 24, 2014 at 08:26 PM PST.

House of Ras: Obama Approval Rating of 52% - Four Month High


There has been some chatter about President Obama's approval rating improving over the past few weeks. Here is some fresh evidence from an unlikely source - our frenemy - Rasmussen Reports. I hope as the ACA signups increase and finish through the end of March and voters appreciate the benefits of Obamacare, this becomes a sign for the rest of 2014. Keep your fingers crossed.


The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Monday shows that 52% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Obama's job performance. Forty-seven percent (47%) disapprove (see trends).

The president’s daily job approval rating has been improving in recent days and now stands at its highest level in four months.
 

Steve

Well-known member
Fact is,.. even 21% regretting their stupidity so soon after the election is significant..

if just those ten percent had wised up earlier we wouldn't be dealing with a lame duck president and a liberal senate on a 6 year vacation..


had all 21% wised up it would have been enough to light a fire under Reid and wake him from his slumber so we could get some real work done in DC..


but sadly the liberal senate 6 year vacation continues.. while the Obama's plunder the kingdom..
 

Mike

Well-known member
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows that 49% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Obama's job performance. Forty-nine percent (49%) disapprove (see trends).

The latest figures include 24% who Strongly Approve of the way Obama is performing as president and 38% who Strongly Disapprove. This gives him a Presidential Approval Index rating of -14.

Results are updated daily at 9:30 a.m. Eastern

Yea. I'd say remorse comes in to play whether anyone wants to believe it or not. :lol:

OT calling someone else's words a "Lie" is pretty funny. unbelievably funny. :lol:
 

Tam

Well-known member
Say Oldtimer if you are using FACT CHECKERS to prove a large majority of Obama voters regretting their Obama vote is false, do you believe the FACT CHECKERS that awarded Obama with the LIE OF THE YEAR over Obamacare?

Do you believe the FACT CHECKERS that say Obama is STILL LYING about Obamacare after he said he was going to work to regain the voters trust?

How does if feel to support/DEFEND a pathological LIAR Oldtimer? :wink:
 

Steve

Well-known member
and gallup has him at 45%

http://www.gallup.com/poll/116479/barack-obama-presidential-job-approval.aspx

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_obama_job_approval-1044.html

real clear politics which is an average fro all the major shows a 43.8


http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/obama_approval_index_history

rasmussen shows 49%

unlike the blogs.. which fudged the numbers you posted..
here is the FACTS

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows that 49% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Obama's job performance. Forty-nine percent (49%) disapprove

Another LIE... All the Major polling sites say this is false- based on false info- but still being put out and spread by the Fearmongers and Hatemongers to stir up the mass's ..

Which you tend to believe since earlier this week those sites claimed Obama's approval rating was at 52% according to the numbers they fudged..

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll

dang blogs.. you really shouldn't believe everything you read OT..
 

Tam

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Another LIE... All the Fact check sites say this is false- based on false info- but still being put out and spread by the Fearmongers and Hatemongers to stir up the mass's ..

Oldtimer wrote
A few of the issues I remember that had women that left the McCain camp screaming on the blogs were her opposition to sex education in public schools, requiring rape victims to pay for the cost of the rape exams, rape kits, and the lab examinations, her extreme rightwing fundamentalist Pentecostal Christian views, her oppositions to abortion, her belief schools should teach Creationism, and her believing in book banning/censorship of public libraries... Her covering up of a sexual harassment scandal in Alaska didn't help her with the women... Many also didn't think she would back women in their goal to get equal pay for equal work...

But it was quite apparent the Independent, moderate Republican, and educated women flocked away from McCain in droves after he brought Palin on board...



OT's score wrote:
opposition to sex education in public schools,
WRONG


Quote:
Palin supports sex education in public schools that encourage abstinence along with teaching about contraception

"GOP ticket split over condom use: While running for state office, Palin said their use ought to be discussed in schools. McCain disagrees.". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved July 1, 2011.





OT's score wrote:
requiring rape victims to pay for the cost of the rape exams, rape kits, and the lab examinations,
false


Quote:
To check out their allegations, we examined documents from the city and the Alaska Legislature and interviewed people in Wasilla, advocates for sexual assault victims and a former state legislator. We found the truth is murky. Although Wasilla had such a “rape kit” policy while Palin was mayor, there is no evidence that she explicitly endorsed the policy.

The policy came to light briefly in 2000 when the Alaska Legislature passed a law that required state and local law enforcement agencies pay the full cost of the exams.

There’s no evidence that Palin ever commented on the rape kit policy.

In response to recent criticism, the McCain-Palin campaign said in a statement that Palin “does not believe, nor has she ever believed, that rape victims should have to pay for an evidence gathering test."





OT's score wrote:
her extreme rightwing fundamentalist Pentecostal Christian views

wrong.. wrong wrong..

Quote:
As governor and mayor, she has trod carefully between fundamentalist beliefs and public policy.

As governor and in her formative role as mayor of Wasilla, Palin has trod carefully between her evangelical faith and public policy on issues such as abortion and library books. At times she has retreated when her moves have sparked controversy or proved politically impractical.

She has harnessed the political muscle of social conservatives and antiabortion groups, yet she did not push hard for a special legislative session on abortion, and she did not challenge a court ruling that allowed health insurance for same-sex partners of state workers.

Palin has attended a number of prayer sessions with pastors and has quietly sought their guidance, but she is often mum on matters of faith in high-profile public forums.

Her aides say Palin's caution at the intersection of religion and governance is a studied effort to share her beliefs without forcing them on Alaska.

"She's obviously an intensively religious person," said Bill McAllister, Palin's chief spokesman as governor. "She understands that she's the governor and not preacher in chief. Religion informs her decisions, but she is not out to impose her views on Alaska."
http://articles.latimes.com/2008/sep/28/nation/na-palinreligion28

dang even a liberal rag like the LA times knew that accusation was not true..




OT's score wrote:
her oppositions to abortion,



my view is not much different.. but show us one example of how her beliefs effected her decisions as a legislature.. but the last article proved your false beliefs ..false..
sorry for using false and wrong so much but I ran out of words to describe your views. .


Quote:
As governor and mayor, she has trod carefully between fundamentalist beliefs and public policy.

As governor and in her formative role as mayor of Wasilla, Palin has trod carefully between her evangelical faith and public policy on issues such as abortion and library books. At times she has retreated when her moves have sparked controversy or proved politically impractical.

She has harnessed the political muscle of social conservatives and antiabortion groups, yet she did not push hard for a special legislative session on abortion, and she did not challenge a court ruling that allowed health insurance for same-sex partners of state workers.

Palin has attended a number of prayer sessions with pastors and has quietly sought their guidance, but she is often mum on matters of faith in high-profile public forums.

Her aides say Palin's caution at the intersection of religion and governance is a studied effort to share her beliefs without forcing them on Alaska.

"She's obviously an intensively religious person," said Bill McAllister, Palin's chief spokesman as governor. "She understands that she's the governor and not preacher in chief. Religion informs her decisions, but she is not out to impose her views on Alaska." http://articles.latimes.com/2008/sep/28/nation/na-palinreligion28





OT's score wrote:
her belief schools should teach Creationism,

WRONG


Quote:
Palin believes evolution "should be taught as an accepted principle" and said that her belief in God's role in Earth's creation "is not part of the state policy or a local curriculum in a school district

Science should be taught in science class."

Couric, Katie (September 30, 2008). "Palin Opens Up On Controversial Issues: VP Candidate Speaks Frankly With Katie Couric

I guess that was one of the parts edited out of the interview..


Quote:
Kizzia, Tom (October 27, 2006). "'Creation science' enters the race: Governor: Palin is only candidate to suggest it should be discussed in schools". Anchorage Daily News. Retrieved May 29, 2010. "the discussion of alternative views should be allowed to arise in Alaska classrooms: 'I don't think there should be a prohibition against debate if it comes up in class. It doesn't have to be part of the curriculum. Palin added that, if elected, she would not push the state Board of Education to add such creation-based alternatives to the state's required curriculum."


nope nothing in there about her "wanting creation to be taught.. period.


this is getting a bit old.. you tell a rumor. and I show it is false or wrong..






OT's score wrote:
and her believing in book banning/censorship of public libraries...



Quote:
status FALSE.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/palin/bannedbooks.asp

see even snopes called it false. but then how can you ban Harry Potter a year before it was written?




OT's score wrote:
Her covering up of a sexual harassment scandal in Alaska didn't help her with the women...


ok that must have been one heck of a cover up,.. as I couldn't find it on the internet.



OT's score wrote:
Many also didn't think she would back women in their goal to get equal pay for equal work...

False (are you noticing a pattern here? )


Quote:
Katie Couric: Do you consider yourself a feminist?

Sarah Palin: I do. I'm a feminist who believes in equal rights and I believe that women certainly today have every opportunity that a man has to succeed and to try to do it all anyway. And I'm very, very thankful that I've been brought up in a family where gender hasn't been an issue.

ouric: What is your definition of a feminist?

Palin: Someone who believes in equal rights. Someone who would not stand for oppression against women.

Couric: Where do you stand on the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act?

Palin: I'm absolutely for equal pay for equal work.

Couric: The Ledbetter act sort of lengthens the time a woman can sue her company if she's not getting equal pay for equal work. Why should a fear of lawsuits trump a woman's ability to do something about the fact that women make 77 cents for every dollar a man makes. And that's today.

Palin: There should be no fear of a lawsuit prohibiting a woman from making sure that the laws that are on the books today are enforced. I know in a McCain-Palin administration we will not stand for any measure that would result in a woman being paid less than a man for equal work.


one of the other parts of that now famous interview where they cut out the answer to insinuate she was a bad woman..


OT's score wrote:
But it was quite apparent the Independent, moderate Republican, and educated women flocked away from McCain in droves after he brought Palin on board...


BullCrap..


Quote:
The big bounce, at least based on a new survey by the venerable Gallup Organization, was McCain's to be had — apparently spurred in large part by the enthusiasm with which many voters have greeted his choice of Sarah Palin as a running mate.

The poll, based on interviews done Friday through Sunday and conducted in conjunction with USA Today, finds that among all registered voters, the McCain ticket now leads Obama's, 50% to 46%. That's an 8-percentage-point turnabout in a matter of a few weeks

To believe that Sarah Palin "cost" McCain anything you would have to ignore all poll data before and after Palin was selected

A week after the selection of Palin, the Republicans would hold their nominating convention and Palin delivered a speech for the ages. Her favorable numbers immediately soared. In fact, her favorable numbers at that point were greater than those of Barack Obama. A CNN Poll had Palin's favorable ratings at +30 (Obama was +26), Newsweek had Palin at +30 (Obama at +20), and NBC News had Palin at +20 (Obama +21). The McCain-Palin ticket suddenly led Obama-Biden in 7 polls, tied in 3, and trailed in just 2. Palin's highlight-reel speech was a big factor, but a bit of those leads had a lot to do with the traditional "post-convention bounce," too.


oh and the pollsters know exactly the week and day the polls shifted in favor of Obama ..

again.. this is part of the liberals attacks..

WOW,... how much more WRONG can you get?


but feel free to show one.. just one far left radical policy or legislative move she made..

Sarah Plain was and is a moderate.. The only thing far right about Palin is the liberal Myth. Shocked Confused Say what?



liberals should feel free to ignore the thread and reality if you can't find just one far left radical policy or legislative move she made.. cuase that is how you deal with all the other crap you get proven wrong on.. Rolling Eyes

Oldtimers response :wink:
It doesn't matter if it was right or wrong- that was how many women saw Palin on the issues... It doesn't matter what I saw-- its what all those running from McCains camp to Obama's (or 3rd parties) because of her saw...
She apparently did a terrible job of getting her message across...

No Oldtimer it had nothing to do with the truth is had to do with the LIES YOU and your Liberal Fearmongering Hater Buddies were spreading as fast as a strong wind spreads a grass fire. And when you are caught with spreading them you pull a Hillary claiming the truth doesn't matter. DO you voice any disgust you were LIED TOO No you just keep spreading the LIES and claim OTHERS ARE CONSTANTLY LYING. :roll:
 

Tam

Well-known member
ANd about the trustworthiness of the Fact Checkers

They claimed Obama did not lie about you keeping your insurance if you like it and that same FACT CHECKER two years later awarded the LIE OF THE YEAR award to Obama for that exact Obama Comment.

They also claimed there was no evidence that Obamacare would have any affect on the job situation in the US when Republicans claimed Obamacare was a JOB KILLER.

But now the CBO is saying Obamacare reduces the incentive to work and will result in an estimated 2.5 million full time jobs turning to PART TIME as the workers don't want to risk a cut in the government subsidy to their Healthcare premiums under Obamacare. This number does not count the number of people being laid off due to the employer mandate for companies with 50 or more employees. The Oklahoma Governor was on TV saying a company in her state told her they had 70 employees and cut back to less than the limited 50 as they could not afford the healthcare premiums or the FINES it they don't buckle and bankrupt themselves providing the mandated Health insurance to their employees under OBAMACARE. AND that they were very upset that Obama delayed that mandate as they had ALREADY LAID THEIR WORKERS OFF. There was another small business owner on TV today and he is sueing Obama over the delay in the mandate as he spent money and time getting ready for the MANDATED REQUIREMENTS only to have Obama change his mind.
That is some pretty stunning evidence of how Obamacare is affecting the US Job Force but the Fact Checker has yet to update the rating on the Republican claim. So anyone reading his website would still believe due to his FACTS that there is no evidence that Obamacare will affect jobs in the US. :roll:

It is bad when you have to spend time continuely fact checking Oldtimer AND the so called FACT CHECKERS. :roll:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Steve said:
and gallup has him at 45%

http://www.gallup.com/poll/116479/barack-obama-presidential-job-approval.aspx

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_obama_job_approval-1044.html

real clear politics which is an average fro all the major shows a 43.8


http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/obama_approval_index_history

rasmussen shows 49%

unlike the blogs.. which fudged the numbers you posted..
here is the FACTS

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows that 49% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Obama's job performance. Forty-nine percent (49%) disapprove

Another LIE... All the Major polling sites say this is false- based on false info- but still being put out and spread by the Fearmongers and Hatemongers to stir up the mass's ..

Which you tend to believe since earlier this week those sites claimed Obama's approval rating was at 52% according to the numbers they fudged..

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll

dang blogs.. you really shouldn't believe everything you read OT..

Look up Mondays poll- it is 52% and that's the article I had on my e-mail from Rasmussen- and is closer in date to the YouGov poll ..

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Monday shows that 52% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Obama's job performance. Forty-seven percent (47%) disapprove (see trends).

It ain't going to matter- because with you cultists, the Pope could tell you that they/you were wrong-- and you would call him a liar...
 

Tam

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Look up Mondays poll- it is 52% and that's the article I had on my e-mail from Rasmussen- and is closer in date to the YouGov poll ..

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Monday shows that 52% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Obama's job performance. Forty-seven percent (47%) disapprove (see trends).

It ain't going to matter- because with you cultists, the Pope could tell you that they/you were wrong-- and you would call him a liar...

President Obama Job Approval

Job Approval on Economy | Job Approval on Foreign Policy


Polling Data

Poll------Date-------Sample ----Approve --------Disapprove ------Spread

RCP Average-- 2/4 - 2/25 ----- ------43.6------ ---------52.8---------- -9.2
Gallup ---------2/23 - 2/25-- 1500 A --- 43--------------54------------- -11
Rasmussen 2/23 - 2/25 ----1500 LV ---49 -------------49--------- Tie
The Economist/YouGov 2/15 - 2/17--- 723 RV--- 42 ------56 -------- -14
FOX News-------- 2/9 - 2/11------- 1006 RV---- 42------ 53------------ -11
McClatchy/Marist 2/4 - 2/9---- 970 RV----- 42------------ 52 -------- -10


You Oldtimer are the Democrat CULTIST that can't speak out and voice any meaningful objects to being LIED to by Obama :wink:
 

Tam

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
He beat Romney by what %?

It's pretty easy to see that if his lies were known before the election, he would not have won.

When you have a Liberal bias media claiming it is their duty to make Obama, the first Black President, a SUCCESS, you are not going to get them to admit they were wrong and Obama was/is LYING. They are just going to keep covering up for him to somehow protect their credibility even if it takes them down with Obama. :roll:
 

Steve

Well-known member
The latest figures include 24% who Strongly Approve of the way Obama is performing as president and 38% who Strongly Disapprove. This gives him a Presidential Approval Index rating of -14.

all this poll shows is that 24% of our society are to blind to see what is going on...

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/obama_approval_index_history

if you look at the trends.. the liberals picked one day his strongly approve rate stayed the same,... yet the strongly disapprove dropped three percentage points..

so basically a few folk thought Obama didn't suck as much as he did the day before.. :shock: :shock: :? :lol:
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
On Saturday, Gallup released its latest 3-day poll noting Barack Obama’s disapproval numbers have soared to 56% of those polled. The highest disapproval percentage Obama has ever registered in the Gallup weekly poll has been 53%. Only 40% approve of how he performs as president, which ties the lowest number in any weekly poll since he took office.


 
Top