S.S.A.P. said:
Katrina and Steve ... or anyone that did get a chance to watch it - in your opinion, what did you see/hear that has caused the removal of the video at all three locations?
I only got to watch part of it, about half, and the video wouldn't load any
more of the video, after hours of waiting...
I think this link still works if you want to see it. That doesn't answer
your question, tho.
http://2016themovie.com/
Well, I guess it's just a trailer... :?
BUT here is Obama's response to the movie, which I thought was quite
interesing. They can make a biased movie about GW Bush, but don't you
DARE make one about Obama!
It’s not every day that a guy provokes the rage of the President of the United States.
Now the President has launched a ferocious attack against me and my film "2016: Obama’s America." Posting his comments on barackobama.com, Obama calls the film “an insidious attempt to dishonestly smear” him by engaging in “subterranean conspiracy theories and false, partisan attacks.”
For weeks the President tried to ignore the film, no doubt hoping that it would go away. Unfortunately for Obama, the film has continued to gain momentum. It has been seen by more than 2 million people, earned more than $27 million, and become the second biggest political documentary of all time.
Also read: '2016: Obama's America': What the Surprise Right-Wing Hit Says About the Election
So now he has decided to come out with guns blazing. Yet what a clumsy, ill-aimed and misleading blast this is. It begins with a quotation deploring “smear journalism.” We read that this quotation is from the “Columbia Journalism Review on "2016: Obama’s America.” Yet the Columbia Journalism Review article was published in September 2010, nearly two years before the film came out! It turns out that the magazine was critiquing one of my earlier books. "The Roots of Obama’s Rage."
Apparently relying on a range of left-wing discredited sources, Obama lists what it takes to be four “flat-out falsehoods.” Let me list and address them in turn.
>> D’Souza falsely claimed that President Obama said he didn’t believe in American exceptionalism.” Oh really? Obama was asked in 2009 whether he believed in American exceptionalism. He replied that he did, just as the Brits believe in British exceptionalism and the Greeks in Greek exceptionalism. The clear implication of Obama’s remarks is that if everyone thinks they are exceptional, no one really is.
>> “D’Souza falsely asserted that President Obama funded $2 billion in Brazilian oil exploration.” The Obama team claims that Obama had “nothing to do with the loan.” Well, the undisputed fact is that the Export-Import Bank awarded more than $2 billion in loans and loan guarantees to Brazil. The Export-Import Bank is a U.S. government agency and policy for the agency is set by the Obama administration. So how can the Obama administration escape responsibility for its own policies?
Moreover, we know that Obama himself approves of the policy. In 2011, Obama went to Brazil, a country where, as he put it, “the legacy of colonialism is still fresh.” There, on March 19, 2011, he reminded the Brazilians of American support for Brazilian oil exploration, and added, “We want to help with technology and support to develop these oil reserves safely, and when you’re ready to start selling, we want to be one of your best customers.”
Moreover, Obama’s Brazil subsidy is not an isolated case; the Obama administration has -- again through the Export-Import Bank -- awarded billions to Mexico and Colombia for oil drilling and refining in those countries.
Also read: Dinesh D'Souza: Fact-Checking AP's Fact Check on '2016: Obama's America'