• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

OIG SLAMS USDA OVER MAD COW BSE SAFEGUARDS AGAIN

Help Support Ranchers.net:

flounder

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 3, 2005
Messages
2,631
Reaction score
0
Location
TEXAS
----- Original Message -----
From: Terry S. Singeltary Sr.
To: Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 4:24 PM
Subject: FEDS UNSURE IF MAD COW SAFEGUARDS FOLLOWED FLAMING REPORT BY OIG PROVES TEXAS COVERED UP MAD COW DISEASE



Subject: FEDS UNSURE IF MAD COW SAFEGUARDS FOLLOWED FLAMING REPORT BY OIG PROVES TEXAS COVERED UP MAD COW DISEASE
Date: February 2, 2006 at 2:00 pm PST

FEDS UNSURE IF MAD COW SAFEGUARDS FOLLOWED


FEB. 2 4:52 P.M. ET Investigators could not determine whether beef slaughterhouses and packing plants obeyed safeguards designed to keep mad cow disease from reaching humans, an Agriculture Department audit found.

The audit, performed throughout 2005 and released Thursday, turned up a case of mad cow disease last year in a Texas cow.

The department's inspector general didn't find that at-risk tissues -- brains, spinal cords and other nerve parts from older animals -- had entered the food supply.



But investigators found it impossible to say whether slaughterhouses were following the rules, according to the report.
The rules were made in response to the first U.S. case of mad cow disease, in 2003. They say at-risk tissues must be removed when older animals are slaughtered. Infection levels from mad cow disease are believed to rise with age.

The Agriculture Department cited slaughterhouses or processing plants more than 1,000 times in 2004 and 2005 for violating the rules.

A department official pointed out that's less than 1 percent of all inspections. Those citations have been dropping, said Kenneth Petersen, assistant administrator for the department's Food Safety and Inspection Service.

Officials have already taken steps to better enforce the rules, said FSIS administrator Barbara Masters.

"FSIS is confident it is successfully carrying out its mission to protect public health," Masters said.

----

On the Net:

Food Safety and Inspection Service: http://www.fsis.usda.gov/



Copyright 2005, by The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8FH7UG8J.htm?campaign_id=apn_home_down&chan=db



Audit Report Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Surveillance Program – Phase II and Food Safety and Inspection Service Controls Over BSE Sampling, Specified Risk Materials, and Advanced Meat Recovery Products - Phase III



UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Washington, D.C. 20250 January 25, 2006 REPLY TO ATTN OF: 50601-10-KC TO: W. Ron DeHaven Administrator Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Barbara Masters Administrator Food Safety and Inspection Service ATTN: William J. Hudnall Deputy Administrator Marketing Regulatory Program Business Services William C. Smith Assistant Administrator Office of Program Evaluation, Enforcement, and Review FROM: Robert W. Young /s/ Assistant Inspector General for Audit SUBJECT: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service - Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Surveillance Program - Phase II and Food Safety and Inspection Service - Controls Over BSE Sampling, Specified Risk Materials, and Advanced Meat Recovery Products - Phase III This report presents the results of our audit of the enhanced BSE surveillance program and controls over specified risk materials and advanced meat recovery products. Your written response to the official draft report, dated January 20, 2006, is included as exhibit G with excerpts of the response and the Office of Inspector General’s (OIG) position incorporated into the Findings and Recommendations section of the report, where applicable. We accept the management decisions for all recommendations. Please follow your agency’s internal procedures in forwarding documentation for final action to the Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO). We are providing a separate memorandum to the agencies and OCFO that provides specific information on the actions to be completed to achieve final action. We appreciate your timely response and the cooperation and assistance provided to our staff during the audit USDA/OIG-A/50601-10-KC/ Page i

Executive Summary

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service - Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Surveillance Program - Phase II and Food Safety and Inspection Service - Controls Over BSE Sampling, Specified Risk Materials, and Advanced Meat Recovery Products - Phase III

Results in Brief This report evaluates elements of the interlocking safeguards in place to protect United States (U.S.) beef from Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, widely known as BSE or "mad cow disease." Since 1990, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), has led a multi-agency effort to monitor and prevent BSE from entering the food supply. After discovering a BSE-positive cow in December 2003, APHIS expanded its BSE surveillance program. To further protect the food supply, USDA banned materials identified as being at risk of carrying BSE (specified risk materials (SRM)), such as central nervous system tissue. As part of this effort, USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) required beef slaughter and processing facilities to incorporate controls for handling such materials into their operational plans. Onsite FSIS inspectors also inspect cattle for clinical signs in order to prevent diseased animals from being slaughtered for human consumption. To evaluate the effectiveness of the safeguards, we assessed APHIS’ implementation of the expanded surveillance program, as well as FSIS’ controls to prevent banned SRMs from entering the food supply.

In June 2004, APHIS implemented its expanded surveillance program; participation by industry in this surveillance program is voluntary. As of May 2005, over 350,000 animals were sampled and tested for BSE. To date, two animals tested positive for BSE; one tested positive after implementation of the expanded surveillance program.

USDA made significant efforts to implement the expanded BSE surveillance program. Much needed to be done in a short period of time to establish the necessary processes, controls, infrastructure, and networks to assist in this effort. In addition, extensive outreach and coordination was undertaken with other Federal, State, and local entities, private industry, and laboratory and veterinary networks. This report provides an assessment as to the progress USDA made in expanding its surveillance effort and the effectiveness of its controls and processes. This report also discusses the limitations of its program and data in assessing the prevalence of BSE in the U.S. herd.



snip...




40 ELISA test procedures require two additional (duplicate) tests if the initial test is reactive, before final interpretation. If either of the duplicate tests is reactive, the test is deemed inconclusive.

41 Protocol for BSE Contract Laboratories to Receive and Test Bovine Brain Samples and Report Results for BSE Surveillance Standard Operating Procedure (SOP), dated October 26, 2004.

42 The NVSL conducted an ELISA test on the original material tested at the contract laboratory and on two new cuts from the sample tissue.

43 A visual examination of brain tissue by a microscope.

44 A localized pathological change in a bodily organ or tissue.

SNIP...


PLEASE SEE FLAMING EVIDENCE THAT THE USDA ET AL COVERED UP MAD COW DISEASE IN TEXAS ;


PAGE 43;


Section 2. Testing Protocols and Quality Assurance Controls


snip...


FULL TEXT 130 PAGES



http://www.usda.gov/oig/webdocs/50601-10-KC.pdf


TSS
 

flounder

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 3, 2005
Messages
2,631
Reaction score
0
Location
TEXAS
Subject: `Downer Cows' Entering Meat Supply, USDA Inspector General Says
Date: February 2, 2006 at 2:12 pm PST

`Downer Cows' Entering Meat Supply, USDA Inspector General Says


Feb. 2 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. government inspectors sometimes allow cattle that can't walk to be slaughtered, contrary to rules aimed at preventing mad-cow disease, the Agriculture Department's Inspector General said in a report.

The inspector general said that at two of 12 slaughter plants reviewed in an audit, 29 non-ambulatory cattle were slaughtered over a 10-month period, and that 20 had been identified as ``downers'' with no records of acute injury.

This violates USDA policy that excludes ``all non- ambulatory disabled cattle from the human food supply,'' the IG said as part of a 118-page review of how the department enforces rules meant to prevent mad-cow disease. The report, which said the USDA must also improve record-keeping, was released on the Inspector General's Web site.

The report was released at a delicate time in negotiations between the U.S. and Japan over the safety of U.S. beef. Japan, normally the biggest overseas customer for the meat, suspended imports on Jan. 20 after banned tissue was found in a shipment of veal. The Japanese government had only allowed imports to resume in December, following a two-year ban because of mad-cow disease.

Japan bought $1.7 billion in U.S. beef in 2003, before banning the meat, along with scores of other nations. Japan's purchases accounted for almost half of total U.S. beef shipments of $3.8 billion that year.

The USDA ordered that downer cattle be excluded from the human food supply after the first case of mad-cow disease was found in the U.S. in December 2003. The brain-wasting livestock illness has a fatal human form blamed for more than 150 deaths in the U.K., where the disease first surfaced in the 1980s. The U.S. confirmed its second BSE case in June, in an animal born in Texas.

The U.S. slaughters about 35 million head of cattle a year.

To contact the reporter on this story:
Daniel Goldstein in Washington at at [email protected]

Last Updated: February 2, 2006 16:37 EST


http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&sid=ah00ElDBTLj4&refer=us


TSS

Click Here

Content-type: text/html


Click to learn more...
Click Here
Follow Ups | Post Followup | Back to Discussion Board | VegSource
Your message has been posted
Subscribe to the VegSource Newsletter!
Enter email address and press Submit.

(This will open a new browser, which you can close to return to this page.)

Go to:
Your Message
Discussion Board... (Note: You may need to press 'Reload' or 'Refresh' to see your message.)

Your post was added to the message board as follows:

From: TSS ()
Subject: `Downer Cows' Entering Meat Supply, USDA Inspector General Says
Date: February 2, 2006 at 2:12 pm PST

`Downer Cows' Entering Meat Supply, USDA Inspector General Says


Feb. 2 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. government inspectors sometimes allow cattle that can't walk to be slaughtered, contrary to rules aimed at preventing mad-cow disease, the Agriculture Department's Inspector General said in a report.

The inspector general said that at two of 12 slaughter plants reviewed in an audit, 29 non-ambulatory cattle were slaughtered over a 10-month period, and that 20 had been identified as ``downers'' with no records of acute injury.

This violates USDA policy that excludes ``all non- ambulatory disabled cattle from the human food supply,'' the IG said as part of a 118-page review of how the department enforces rules meant to prevent mad-cow disease. The report, which said the USDA must also improve record-keeping, was released on the Inspector General's Web site.

The report was released at a delicate time in negotiations between the U.S. and Japan over the safety of U.S. beef. Japan, normally the biggest overseas customer for the meat, suspended imports on Jan. 20 after banned tissue was found in a shipment of veal. The Japanese government had only allowed imports to resume in December, following a two-year ban because of mad-cow disease.

Japan bought $1.7 billion in U.S. beef in 2003, before banning the meat, along with scores of other nations. Japan's purchases accounted for almost half of total U.S. beef shipments of $3.8 billion that year.

The USDA ordered that downer cattle be excluded from the human food supply after the first case of mad-cow disease was found in the U.S. in December 2003. The brain-wasting livestock illness has a fatal human form blamed for more than 150 deaths in the U.K., where the disease first surfaced in the 1980s. The U.S. confirmed its second BSE case in June, in an animal born in Texas.

The U.S. slaughters about 35 million head of cattle a year.

To contact the reporter on this story:
Daniel Goldstein in Washington at at [email protected]

Last Updated: February 2, 2006 16:37 EST


http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&sid=ah00ElDBTLj4&refer=us


TSS
 

flounder

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 3, 2005
Messages
2,631
Reaction score
0
Location
TEXAS
IF this report does not prove to the world that the infamous June 2004 'ENHANCED' BSE surveillance program in the USA was nothing more than another PR ploy, something that was never ever intended to find anything, than nothing else will. simply put, like i have said before, the 500,000+ cattle tested in the june 2004 enhance bse cover-up are absolutely meaningless and must be retested with proper protocols. WE have 9,200 of those test that were ONLY IHC, the same test that DID NOT find the 2nd TEXAS mad cow (the one they finally confirmed), and that is just for starters. you know the rest. GWs BSe MRR policy was nothing more than the legalization of trading all strains of TSEs Globally, and the OIE went right along with it. 20+ years of trying to eradicate this deadly agent gone in one swipe of the pen with the BSE MRR policy. nothing like politicians/industry dictating science. ...


still disgusted in Bacliff, Texas USA. ...TSS
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
The headline in February 4, 2006 The Japan Times---No Guarantee on Beef Safety: US Report...

They then go on to cite the Inspector Generals report and all the failures found in the USDA's inspection procedure....

NOT GOOD!!!
 

Bill

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
2,066
Reaction score
0
Location
GWN
Oldtimer said:
The headline in February 4, 2006 The Japan Times---No Guarantee on Beef Safety: US Report...

They then go on to cite the Inspector Generals report and all the failures found in the USDA's inspection procedure....

NOT GOOD!!!
Hopefully the Japanese won't ask us to close our border to you so we can still ship to them.

Remember when R-Calf was singing that song?
 

Latest posts

Top