• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Oil Execs Say Obama Lead Us To "Energy Abyss"

Help Support Ranchers.net:

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Messages
24,216
Reaction score
0
Location
real world
Energy: Industry leaders gathered in Houston say rising fuel output comes in spite of, not because of, the president's policies and the pain at the pump will soon be excruciating.

Energy executives and other industry players gathered for the North American Prospect Expo (NAPE) in Houston shredded administration assertions that it is opening up areas for oil and gas exploration and that its policies are responsible for increased oil and gas production on President Obama's watch.

"These have been the most difficult three years from a policy standpoint that I've ever seen in my career," Bruce Vincent, president of Houston oil and natural gas producer Swift Energy, told the Houston Chronicle.

"They've done nothing but restrict access and delay permitting," he added. "The Obama administration, unfortunately, has threatened this industry at every turn."

Vincent led the voices exposing White House press secretary Jay Carney's phony assertion Wednesday when asked about gas prices soaring above $4 per gallon.

Carney said President Obama had "put in place policies that will dramatically expand the amount of exploration in the Gulf of Mexico, will expand the amount of exploration in Alaska, will expand the amount of natural gas production here in the U.S."

Really? "The administration has done everything BUT support drilling," said NAPE attendee and former Shell executive John Hofmeister. "We are on the verge of slipping into an energy abyss."

Shell has fought the administration to begin drilling in the Chukchi Sea off Alaska.
mp3Subscribe to the IBD Editorials Podcast

The federal government estimates there are 26.6 billion barrels of recoverable oil and 130 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in the Arctic Ocean's Outer Continental Shelf but repeated safety reviews and designation of much of the region as critical polar bear habitat has slowed development to a crawl.

Only 2.2% of federal offshore land is currently being leased for production.

Then there are the 10 billion barrels locked up in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve, which would require drilling in just 2,000 acres out of 19 million.

The Obama administration recently rescinded 77 oil and gas leases in Utah and stalled oil shale research and development in Utah, Colorado and Wyoming, where the federal government owns most of the world's oil shale reserves.

Out West, we may have a "Persia on the Plains." A Rand Corp. study says the Green River Formation, which covers parts of Colorado, Utah and Wyoming, has the largest known oil shale deposits in the world, holding from 1.5 trillion to 1.8 trillion barrels of crude — most of it locked up by federal edict.

Email
Print
License
Comment
inShare

Under President Obama, the American Petroleum Institute notes, leases on federal lands in the West are down 44%, while permits and new well drilling are both down 39% compared to 2007 levels.

After the BP oil spill, President Obama shut down most Gulf of Mexico drilling and there's been a 57% drop in monthly deepwater permits since 2008, according to the Greater New Orleans Gulf Permit Index.

Domestic oil output is up largely because individual states such as North Dakota and Pennsylvania allow drilling on nonfederal lands to get oil and gas locked in shale formations such as the Marcellus and Bakken.

The Environmental Protection Agency is currently investigating the safety of the long-used technique of hydraulic fracturing or "fracking." The Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas, the Permian Basin in Texas where the feds seek to protect an endangered lizard, and the Bakken Shale in North Dakota now make up about 40% of the nation's land-based oil output. The Obama administration had nothing to do with it.

As the President takes credit for the fruits of an innovative oil and gas industry, he has cut us off from more oil — including Canadian, by not building the Keystone XL pipeline — than the Iranians and the rest of OPEC could ever do.

http://news.investors.com/article/602069/201202231805/energy-abyss-caused-by-obama-policies.htm
 
Darn it, Shell forgot to mention that an agreement had recently been reached between the US and Mexico on drilling in the western Gulf of Mexico subject to Congressional approval. Supposedly there is ~170 million barrels (conservatively estimating) plus enormous natural gas reserves there. It is close to the refineries in TX., affording cheaper transportation,etc. I heard this this morning on C-Span by a reporter (an energy epecialist) who reports for the Houston Chronicle, a major TX. newspaper. Was he lying??
 
TSR said:
Darn it, Shell forgot to mention that an agreement had recently been reached between the US and Mexico on drilling in the western Gulf of Mexico subject to Congressional approval. Supposedly there is ~170 million barrels (conservatively estimating) plus enormous natural gas reserves there. It is close to the refineries in TX., affording cheaper transportation,etc. I heard this this morning on C-Span by a reporter (an energy epecialist) who reports for the Houston Chronicle, a major TX. newspaper. Was he lying??


No, he wasn't lying. When's production start? The rigs are probably just sitting around waiting.......


Too bad all that money was given away to those now bankrupt "green" energy companies eh? Could have built some more off shore rigss, so drilling ccould start sooner in this new are of the Gulf.......
 
Nothing like having HOPE in a shot in the dark, at the expense of a sure thing.



"These reservoirs could hold considerable reserves that would benefit the United States and Mexico alike," Clinton said

When it comes into force, the agreement will end the current moratorium on oil exploration and production in the Western Gap portion of the Gulf of Mexico.

"With this, we are setting aside the old fear that honestly exists among many Mexicans that Mexico's oil could be extracted from the other side," said Mexican President Felipe Calderon. "Any joint reservoir will be jointly exploited," and we will all gain the benefits.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-20/clinton-signs-accord-in-mexico-for-oil-exploration-with-state-owned-pemex.html?id=11082&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
 
Production would start a lot quicker than elsewhere because of its proximity to the materials/infrastructure necessary for startup and production according to the Houston Chronicle reporter. But who knows, the project has to be approved by the Congress before anything happens because if I understood correctly, the Mexican gov. owns all its country's oil, having nationalized them in the past saying that large all companies had cheated them in the past,so approval by both legislatures is necessary. This brings up another point. Did you know that royalties paid to the US gov. on barrels of oil obtained on federal land/maritime leases is based on what the oil companies tell our government--there's very little oversight by our gov., they just take the oil companies word for the amounts.
 
TSR said:
Production would start a lot quicker than elsewhere because of its proximity to the materials/infrastructure necessary for startup and production according to the Houston Chronicle reporter. But who knows, the project has to be approved by the Congress before anything happens because if I understood correctly, the Mexican gov. owns all its country's oil, having nationalized them in the past saying that large all companies had cheated them in the past,so approval by both legislatures is necessary. This brings up another point. Did you know that royalties paid to the US gov. on barrels of oil obtained on federal land/maritime leases is based on what the oil companies tell our government--there's very little oversight by our gov., they just take the oil companies word for the amounts.


Exploration in that area still needs to be done. Production is years away.

whereas there are many areas in the US, that reserves are "proven" and could be drilled within weeks, if only they were allowed.

obama is pulling the wool over your eyes again.
 
TSR said:
Darn it, Shell forgot to mention that an agreement had recently been reached between the US and Mexico on drilling in the western Gulf of Mexico subject to Congressional approval. Supposedly there is ~170 million barrels (conservatively estimating) plus enormous natural gas reserves there. It is close to the refineries in TX., affording cheaper transportation,etc. I heard this this morning on C-Span by a reporter (an energy epecialist) who reports for the Houston Chronicle, a major TX. newspaper. Was he lying??

not having seen the details. it is difficult to say if this is a great deal or just one that was done to get good news... Obama seems to often focus on the news and not the details..

either way in the liberal "ten years it takes to drill" some one other then Obama will take credit for this oil production increase as well... :D

but I will compliment him when he finally signs the deal.. as many of US have when he follows through with Bush policy measures..
 

Latest posts

Top