• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

OK BOYS HERE IT IS,THE REAL DEAL

Help Support Ranchers.net:

HAY MAKER

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
8,789
Reaction score
0
Location
Texas
New Mexico Stockman, Arizona CattleLog, Livestock Market Digest --- February 2006

DIARY OF A MAD COW-- by Lee Pitts
In a recent letter to its members the NCBA explained why ranchers have enjoyed good times the past couple years. "Economists around this country agree that the cattle prices we have experienced for many months now, prices that began to climb before the Canadian border closure, is the result of two things: tremendous growth in consumer demand and the cattle cycle. A trade association can do little if nothing to affect the cattle cycle, but when it comes to beef demand it is clear the checkoff-funded efforts, many of which are managed by NCBA, have contributed considerably to increasing demand, which is defined as consumers' willingness to pay increasing prices even as supplies increase. Again, through the leadership of cattlemen, NCBA is the association that gets it done for you."

For posterity's sake I'd like to review the milestones in mad cow history to prove a point: That the profitability we've been enjoying has been the result of an association's efforts on your behalf. But it wasn't the NCBA. We've had the checkoff for decades now, why during the past two years did their efforts only begun to kick in? And now with prices falling, why can't they use some of their magic again?

For the record, prior to the time when mad cows started popping up on this continent prices for cattle weren't all that great. In the year 2000 the average Omaha fat cattle price was 69.65, the average for 700 to 800 pound feeders was 86.17 and the average utility slaughter cow, according to Cattle Fax, was worth 39.87 per pound. In 2001 the average fat cattle price for the year moved up to 72.40, the feeder was worth 88.20 and the slaughter cow was worth 43.01. All in all, not a bad year. The next year prices slipped. The fat steer went back to 67.04, the feeder market fell all the way back to 80.09 and the lowly slaughter cow was worth 38.65. So much for NCBA's claim that cattle prices were rising prior to BSE.

Keeping those numbers in mind . . . now we can begin our story.

January 31, 2003 -- This is when the Mad Cow nightmare for North America began . . . only no one knew it at the time. A crossbred black cow from a herd of 192 belonging to a Canadian fish farmer was killed at a meat plant in Alberta. Later she would be called, not so affectionately, COW ZERO. As a base of reference here are the prices for cattle during the month of January before all the mad cow madness began: Omaha fat cattle: 77.18; Omaha feeder cattle: 78.16; Cattle Fax slaughter cows: 37.29.

May 16, 2003 -- Preliminary results were back in Canada and this was the first the public officially heard that there was a mad cow in Canada. Markets drifted lower as cattlemen on both sides of the border waited for confirmation.

May 20, 2003 -- She was just one cow out of 5.5 million head of Canadian cattle but she was like none other to come before her . . . a Canadian Mad Cow. Her coming out party became a day that changed the world . . . both yours and Canadian cattlemen. For you it would bring unprecedented good times. For the Canadian cattlemen it would usher in what one Alberta official called, "The single biggest catastrophe to hit rural Canada since the drouth and the depression of the 1930s."

Canadian cattle prices crashed 70 percent and some Canadian slaughter cows brought two cents per pound. The two million head of Canadian cattle that had been coming south every year were stopped at the border. Omaha fat cattle price for the month: 79.50; Omaha feeder cattle: 82.03; Cattle Fax slaughter cows: 42.00.

August 2003 -- The Bush administration and the NCBA were pushing hard for the Canadian border to be reopened. They got part of their wish when the border was partially opened to Canadian muscle cuts. The tonnage of beef from Canada would break all records in the months ahead as Canada tried to solve her mad cow crises by bundling up her beef in boxes and sending it south. Despite the flood of Canadian beef, cattlemen on this side of the border were reaping the benefits of a closed border. Omaha fat cattle: 84.74; Omaha feeder cattle: 93.34; Slaughter cows: 45.99

October 2003 -- The fastest growing cattlemen's group in the country, R-CALF, was founded by Leo McDonnell primarily on one issue: that if we weren't flooded by imports of both beef and cattle from our northern and southern neighbors that we could have a cattle business in this country that was both profitable and sustainable. It took a Canadian mad cow to prove R-CALF's thesis correct. Once the border was closed cattlemen on this side received the highest prices in history for their stock. In October of 2003 the price of fat cattle averaged 105.50 for the month!

December 23, 2003 -- A day that will not soon be forgotten. It was Christmas week and our present from Santa was our very own mad cow in this country. Albeit by way of Canada. Within three days of the Mabton Mad Cow being found in Washington state the United States lost 90 percent of its beef export market.

In introducing the Mabton Mad Cow at a Friday press conference on December 24 former Ag Secretary Veneman made no mention of the fact that the cow originally came from Canada. When the futures market opened on the following Friday the futures market for all classes of cattle fell. After everyone learned that the Mabton Mad Cow was Canadian the markets recovered as indicated by these average prices for the month of December 2003. Omaha fat cattle: 90.75; Omaha feeder cattle: 101.63; Cattle Fax slaughter cows: 50.32. Note: Our market didn't crash like Canada's because ours is mostly a domestic market: we eat what we produce. In Canada they export over half of their production.

May 2004 -- R-CALF wins a preliminary injunction against USDA stopping the border from being opened. They won this first injunction because they were able to prove that the USDA was illegally allowing importation of banned Canadian beef products. The injunction was to remain in effect until the USDA would rewrite and release a new set of rules regarding the importation of live Canadian cattle. Omaha fat cattle: 88.22 Omaha feeder cattle: 104.74 Cattle Fax slaughter cows: 52.34

June 25, 2004 -- This was to be the first of several frustrating days for cattleman as USDA, using their newly formatted testing program, would announce a preliminary positive test result for mad cow, only to later to reveal that the cow in question was free of the disease. The announcement in this, and subsequent episodes always had the effect of driving futures prices significantly lower.

The USDA had discovered a way to lower live cattle prices and used it often but it had no effect whatsoever on the prices packers and retailers were receiving for the beef they sold. As their share of the beef dollar reached the highest point in history, lower cattle prices for ranchers and feeders just meant the profit grew for packers and retailers. This at the same time that Canadian beef packers, which is to say American packers operating on Canadian soil, were buying Canadian cattle at fire sale prices and selling the beef on this side of the border for full markup.

Meanwhile, in spite of the false mad cow alerts Omaha fat cattle were worth 89.19; Omaha feeder cattle: 113.31 and Cattle Fax slaughter cows: 53.92. Note: A month later prices for 700-800 pound feeders steers in this country were quoted at 117.10. Another record. Gee, golly gosh. Thanks NCBA.

December, 2004 -- The USDA released 500 pages of new rules regarding imports from Canada and officially proclaimed the border would reopen to live cattle on March 7, 2005. The market had been working lower in anticipation of this announcement: Omaha fat cattle: 86.60; Omaha feeder cattle: 101.63; Slaughter cows: 51.22

January 2, 2005 -- This reporter was sitting on an auction block in Caldwell, Idaho in the middle of a video sale when I was handed a piece of paper that said Canada had just announced it's third mad cow. Prices at the video sale immediately spiked. Two weeks later Canada announced their fourth mad cow. Despite what we thought was to be the opening of the border on March 7 prices still remained high. Omaha fat cattle: 88.50; Omaha feeder cattle: 105.00; Cattle Fax slaughter cows: 52.37

March 2, 2005 -- With just five days to go before the USDA was to open the border R-CALF once again won a preliminary injunction to stop the upcoming opening. A Montana judge said that there were food safety and health issues that the USDA had not fully addressed and he did not feel it was prudent to open the border until those issues had a full hearing in his courtroom. Later the judge would set a court date of July 27, 2005 to hear all sides. Judging by Judge Cebull's language in the injunction R-CALF felt that there was a 50/50 chance that when R-CALF did get their day in court they might also be able to stop the flood of Canadian beef that was coming across the border in boxes. Because slaughter cattle, cow and bull beef were no longer coming across the border the average cow price for the month, according to Cattle Fax, was an amazing 58.25! The year prior to mad cow the average was 37.29.

June 9, 2005 -- Ag Secretary Mike Johanns suggested in a speech about BSE that beef prices were too high. The next day and throughout the weeks to follow he did something about those high prices. At least the prices cattlemen were receiving for their cattle. About the packer's and retailers profits he did nothing.

June 10, 2005 -- Johanns announced that a cow that had been killed seven months prior had shown weakly reactive results at the time. Samples of tissue were sent to England and it was official. America had its first mad cow. Prices trended a bit lower but the roof did not cave in and within a few days prices had recovered.

July 14, 2005 -- A three judge panel in Seattle issued a 56-page decision explaining its reasoning in overturning the temporary injunction granted by Judge Cebull. The panel said that Judge Cebull had erred in issuing the preliminary injunction that kept the border closed. What was very interesting was that the panel of judges admitted that there were weaknesses in some USDA procedures but still they took it upon themselves to lift the injunction and reopen the border. The USDA had not even asked the panel to do this.

July 18, 2005 -- Trucks loaded with Canadian cattle were already rolling into the U.S. On the same day, October feeder cattle closed $2/cwt lower. On this day packers were bidding $77 and $78 and some weren't bidding at all. The negative effect of this decision was already apparent. Limiting the exodus somewhat was the permit process and the fact that many Canadian truckers had either parked their trucks, quit or are hauling something else. But it did not take long to gear up as 123 permits for export were written up in the first few days.

Meanwhile we learned that Judge Cebull had postponed R-CALF's date in his courtroom to hear the entire case against the USDA. Some observers said it was postponed because Cebull saw that now that America had its very own mad cow that much of R-CALF's case was now meaningless. Some predicted that Cebull would just dismiss the case and let the border remain open. R-CALF maintained that the Cebull was just waiting to see if the panel of judges in Seattle would grant intervener status to the National Meat Association, Canadian Cattlemen's Association and the Alberta Beef producers. (The panel of judges did not grant them such status.)

Both sides have filed for summary judgment and the Judge could rule on the case without a trial or the postponed trial may go on after all.

Unfortunately for Canadian cattleman, the border opened just in time for them to participate in a price wreck in live cattle caused by the border reopening. Which is probably what the packers had in mind the entire time.

So here's where we stand: America is now accepting live cattle no other country in the world will accept and our Asian export markets remain closed. The meat packers Union in Canada is threatening to strike Tyson, which kills 40 percent of Canada's fed cattle. Cattle on-feed numbers in Alberta and Saskatchewan are up 15 percent over year ago levels and in September many cattle will come out of a Canadian government set-aside program and will be for sale. American ranchers selling on the Fall market will then have their prices lowered by a glut of Canadian cattle that were subsidized. Fat cattle are now back down to 78 (near where they were before the mad cow madness began), feeder cattle that were fetching 1.13 before the border reopened are bringing 1.02 to 1.04 and trending lower. And all these lower prices brought to you by President Bush, three liberal judges, meat packers, the NCBA, American Farm Bureau Federation, National Pork Producers Council and 29 State Cattlemen's Associations.

Meanwhile slaughter cows are still at record prices. As I write this they are 52 percent higher than they were when Canada announced their first mad cow. There is a very simple explanation for this and it has absolutely nothing to do with the NCBA's beef promotion efforts: The border is closed to Canadian cow beef. Canada can't send slaughter cows down here, nor their meat. End of argument. (In the coming year look for the USDA to try to lift the ban on dairy springers and then slaughter cows.)

We apologize for all the numbers in this story but they were necessary to show you the possibilities of the good times we could enjoy if President Bush and the NCBA weren't busy signing away your future with more "free trade" agreements. (As I write this CAFTA just passed with NCBA's ringing endorsement.) We also wanted to prove that you really do owe the last couple good years to a real cattlemen's organization: R-CALF. If you'll recall, it was founded on the idea that we could be profitable if imports could be controlled. The R-CALF founders were prophets. Or maybe we should spell that PROFITS . . . because you may have just seen your last of those for awhile.
 

mrj

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 21, 2005
Messages
4,530
Reaction score
1
Location
SD
Surprise! Another post by Haymaker purporting to be current information.......and the author himself stated CAFTA had just passed! That was a while ago, and cattle prices have not dropped like he predicted.
How typical.... and misleading....by both Haymaker and Pitts.

MRJ
 

the chief

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 17, 2005
Messages
385
Reaction score
0
Location
midwest
Surprise! Another post by Haymaker purporting to be current information.......and the author himself stated CAFTA had just passed! That was a while ago, and cattle prices have not dropped like he predicted.
How typical.... and misleading....by both Haymaker and Pitts.

MRJ

So, MRJ, when does the "obvious" ever sink into your little brain? :???:
 

feeder

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
950
Reaction score
0
Location
Iowa
Would it be possible that the author wrote this article and that it wasn't published till later? Thankyou Haymaker for posting this, it gave an overall view of what has been happening to our markets during the last years. I don't know what it will take to see there is a change a brewing in the cattle industry. I only have two known incidents personally. We were warned by our analysts that February we would see an increase in fat cattle ready and a bigger captive supply. They were correct. My pocket book felt it. Also I had a cattle buyer call yesterday saying the feeder market has softened for 700#. Granted grassers are always higher now but to have them 700# soften as much as he says they are makes a person wonder what is ahead. Will see if he is right, we hope to put an order out through him today.
 

DiamondSCattleCo

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 12, 2005
Messages
1,802
Reaction score
0
Location
NE Saskatchewan
So, for you isolationists, how much do you think your beef prices would be affected if Canada suddenly decided to block all goods from the US? Its all connected. If Detroit sells a couple fewer trucks, there is that much less money on the market for a US family to buy steak instead of hamburger.

The free trade agreements between our two countries has been beneficial. Sure its hurt some of your less competitive industries, but its helped others. You can't have your cake and eat it too. Its time for this isolationist garbage to drop away, and time for a completely free border between the US and Canada. As patriots, you may not want to believe this, but the US needs Canada more than we need the US. We have other places to sell to, and are currently expanding those markets. You guys have 1 place to get water and power from. Detroits really only got one other market for its gas guzzling SUVs. Check your export lists. Canada's name sits at or near the top in many categories. Do you truly believe that if those exports shut off tomorrow that your country would be just fine?

Rod
 

feeder

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
950
Reaction score
0
Location
Iowa
We all need trade. I'm just tired of our farmers, including hog farmers, told to decrease production due to excessive amount of product being imported. We can import but not to the degree we have to slow our production so another country can increase theirs.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Pitts: "That the profitability we've been enjoying has been the result of an association's efforts on your behalf. But it wasn't the NCBA."

Hahaha!

How can anyone be so naive as to think that R-CALF had anything to do with higher cattle prices.

We had higher cattle prices DESPITE R-CALF. What more proof does anyone need than the fact that cattle prices continued to rise after the Canadian border was opened to boxed beef and then again after the Canadian border was opened to live cattle.

FACT: FEEDER CATTLE PRICES WERE HIGHER THIS YEAR WITH AN OPENED CANADIAN BORDER THAN THEY WERE LAST YEAR WITH A CLOSED CANADIAN BORDER.

That is an absolute undeniable fact.

What Pitts doesn't tell you is where beef demand would have been without the beef checkoff.


Pitts: "We've had the checkoff for decades now, why during the past two years did their efforts only begun to kick in? And now with prices falling, why can't they use some of their magic again?"

Hey Sandbag, why don't you lecture Pitts on isolating a single factor and attributing the cattle markets to it (checkoff)? Where's the consistancy in your arguments you damn hypocrite?

Pitts is nothing more than an LMA mouth piece. Same song and dance that other industry blamers sing and dance to.

What's more important than what this article tells you is what it doesn't tell you. That's the problem with these industry blamers. They don't have a clue what factors really do affect cattle prices.


~SH~
 

DiamondSCattleCo

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 12, 2005
Messages
1,802
Reaction score
0
Location
NE Saskatchewan
feeder said:
We all need trade. I'm just tired of our farmers, including hog farmers, told to decrease production due to excessive amount of product being imported. We can import but not to the degree we have to slow our production so another country can increase theirs.

I can understand your frustration Feeder, we get almost the same line here. With us its 'DIVERSIFY!'. IN other words, pull resources from one good to produce another. Then the other good suddenly floods the market and we're told to do it all over again.

Many people look to gov't to close borders or support failing industries. I think its much healthier to get active and look for new markets, versus adopting protectionist attitudes. In a way, the BSE thing was good for us as its now opened up cattleman's eyes to the fact we don't have a secure market to the south, so we're looking elsewhere. Long term, its a good thing. I think you guys closing your borders is a bad thing for your own producers. Sure, short term it means you get a market to supply with goods, but your production is going to increase. Eventually, your local market will be full, but no-one will have bothered to open up external markets.

Rod
 

rkaiser

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Messages
1,958
Reaction score
0
Location
Calgary Alberta
August 2003 -- The Bush administration and the NCBA were pushing hard for the Canadian border to be reopened. They got part of their wish when the border was partially opened to Canadian muscle cuts. The tonnage of beef from Canada would break all records in the months ahead as Canada tried to solve her mad cow crises by bundling up her beef in boxes and sending it south. Despite the flood of Canadian beef, cattlemen on this side of the border were reaping the benefits of a closed border. Omaha fat cattle: 84.74; Omaha feeder cattle: 93.34; Slaughter cows: 45.99

Open your eyes to your own story Rcalf boys.

You simply supported the two companies that you desire to beat.

August 2003 - The Salmon run in Canada began and prices in America continued to rise. :roll:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Randy,

Did you get this part?

May 2004 -- R-CALF wins a preliminary injunction against USDA stopping the border from being opened.

What part of that do you not understand?


R-CALF is saying that USDA wanted to open the border and you are saying they wanted it to stay closed. If actions speak louder than words, I would say the above date should tell you something but somehow I doubt it will.


~SH~
 

Big Muddy rancher

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
22,021
Reaction score
234
Location
Big Muddy valley
A crossbred black cow from a herd of 192 belonging to a Canadian fish farmer was killed at a meat plant in Alberta.


He was a American fish farmer that moved to Canada to ranch.


Pitts lives up to his name.
 

Bill

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
2,066
Reaction score
0
Location
GWN
America is now accepting live cattle no other country in the world will accept and our Asian export markets remain closed.
Mexico, Hong Kong and Macau had opened long before this article was written and some Asian countries were and are still taking Canadian and not American product.

The sad thing is that Pitts continues to be a columnist in the Cattlemans Corner portion of the GrainNews newspaper out of Manitoba.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Big Muddy rancher said:
A crossbred black cow from a herd of 192 belonging to a Canadian fish farmer was killed at a meat plant in Alberta.


He was a American fish farmer that moved to Canada to ranch.


Pitts lives up to his name.

Aren't your immigration laws just wonderful-- Canucks welcome anyone and everyone- main reason Tam will need to get her International Passport and be fingerprinted :wink: :lol:

Except if you want to stay an American citizen/resident Saskatchewan won't let you buy or own property -even if it neighbors you across the line :???:
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
18,486
Reaction score
0
Location
Nebraska
DiamondSCattleCo said:
So, for you isolationists, how much do you think your beef prices would be affected if Canada suddenly decided to block all goods from the US? Its all connected. If Detroit sells a couple fewer trucks, there is that much less money on the market for a US family to buy steak instead of hamburger.

The free trade agreements between our two countries has been beneficial. Sure its hurt some of your less competitive industries, but its helped others. You can't have your cake and eat it too. Its time for this isolationist garbage to drop away, and time for a completely free border between the US and Canada. As patriots, you may not want to believe this, but the US needs Canada more than we need the US. We have other places to sell to, and are currently expanding those markets. You guys have 1 place to get water and power from. Detroits really only got one other market for its gas guzzling SUVs. Check your export lists. Canada's name sits at or near the top in many categories. Do you truly believe that if those exports shut off tomorrow that your country would be just fine?

Rod

Rod, there's a whole bunch of us who get labeled "protectionists" on this board who certainly are not protectionists per Webster's. Our good friend SH comes to mind - he's got his own definition. What a lot of us "protectionists" are is a bunch of people who think this "free" trade needs a little common sense applied. In today's environment, trade trumps everything; health, environment, existing laws, safety, etc... That's not right. We're not against trade and are certainly not advocating putting a big wall around our country, we're just asking for the free-for-all to end and a little thought put into the process.
 

Tommy

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
755
Reaction score
0
Location
South East Kansas
Sandhusker...Our good friend SH comes to mind - he's got his own definition.

Scott wants to put a label on everyone and everything except beef.
 

Bill

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
2,066
Reaction score
0
Location
GWN
Oldtimer said:
Big Muddy rancher said:
A crossbred black cow from a herd of 192 belonging to a Canadian fish farmer was killed at a meat plant in Alberta.


He was a American fish farmer that moved to Canada to ranch.


Pitts lives up to his name.

Aren't your immigration laws just wonderful-- Canucks welcome anyone and everyone- main reason Tam will need to get her International Passport and be fingerprinted :wink: :lol:

Except if you want to stay an American citizen/resident Saskatchewan won't let you buy or own property -even if it neighbors you across the line :???:
T=You have mentioned an International Passport a couple of times now Oldfellow. Is there any other kind of passport than an International Passport or have R-Calf and Brian Schweitzer succeeded in getting that wall put up around Montana? :roll:
 

rkaiser

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Messages
1,958
Reaction score
0
Location
Calgary Alberta
Randy,

Did you get this part?

Quote:
May 2004 -- R-CALF wins a preliminary injunction against USDA stopping the border from being opened.


What part of that do you not understand?


R-CALF is saying that USDA wanted to open the border and you are saying they wanted it to stay closed. If actions speak louder than words, I would say the above date should tell you something but somehow I doubt it will.


~SH~

Yip SH got it.

Do you get this part

August 2003 -- The Bush administration and the NCBA were pushing hard for the Canadian border to be reopened. They got part of their wish when the border was partially opened to Canadian muscle cuts. The tonnage of beef from Canada would break all records in the months ahead as Canada tried to solve her mad cow crises by bundling up her beef in boxes and sending it south. Despite the flood of Canadian beef, cattlemen on this side of the border were reaping the benefits of a closed border. Omaha fat cattle: 84.74; Omaha feeder cattle: 93.34; Slaughter cows: 45.99

Tyson and Cargill got all they wanted in August 2003.

Do you get this part SH

Rcalf is a joke, and NCBA is a bigger Joke. Cargill and Tyson will decide.

How's Conagra doing these days. Going down quick I hear. But we only need two bidders to survive right. :lol: :lol: :lol:
 

ocm

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 16, 2005
Messages
779
Reaction score
0
~SH~ said:
Pitts: "That the profitability we've been enjoying has been the result of an association's efforts on your behalf. But it wasn't the NCBA."

Hahaha!

How can anyone be so naive as to think that R-CALF had anything to do with higher cattle prices.

We had higher cattle prices DESPITE R-CALF. What more proof does anyone need than the fact that cattle prices continued to rise after the Canadian border was opened to boxed beef and then again after the Canadian border was opened to live cattle.

FACT: FEEDER CATTLE PRICES WERE HIGHER THIS YEAR WITH AN OPENED CANADIAN BORDER THAN THEY WERE LAST YEAR WITH A CLOSED CANADIAN BORDER.

That is an absolute undeniable fact.

What Pitts doesn't tell you is where beef demand would have been without the beef checkoff.


Pitts: "We've had the checkoff for decades now, why during the past two years did their efforts only begun to kick in? And now with prices falling, why can't they use some of their magic again?"

Hey Sandbag, why don't you lecture Pitts on isolating a single factor and attributing the cattle markets to it (checkoff)? Where's the consistancy in your arguments you damn hypocrite?

Pitts is nothing more than an LMA mouth piece. Same song and dance that other industry blamers sing and dance to.

What's more important than what this article tells you is what it doesn't tell you. That's the problem with these industry blamers. They don't have a clue what factors really do affect cattle prices.


~SH~

And your economic analysis where you isolated all these factors says what?
 

the chief

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 17, 2005
Messages
385
Reaction score
0
Location
midwest
SH said:
How can anyone be so naive as to think that R-CALF had anything to do with higher cattle prices.

We had higher cattle prices DESPITE R-CALF. What more proof does anyone need than the fact that cattle prices continued to rise after the Canadian border was opened to boxed beef and then again after the Canadian border was opened to live cattle.

I ask a simple question: How much profit did cattlemen enjoy BEFORE R-CALF was a part of the equation? :shock:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
the chief said:
SH said:
How can anyone be so naive as to think that R-CALF had anything to do with higher cattle prices.

We had higher cattle prices DESPITE R-CALF. What more proof does anyone need than the fact that cattle prices continued to rise after the Canadian border was opened to boxed beef and then again after the Canadian border was opened to live cattle.

I ask a simple question: How much profit did cattlemen enjoy BEFORE R-CALF was a part of the equation? :shock:

You mean back in the days of year after year of $60-$70 calves and $18 cull cows-- when NCBA yearly told us to wait until next year :???: And pay your checkoff because that is getting us these good prices :???: :lol: :lol:

What did several Congressmen say--Something about we didn't even no times were tough in the cattle business until R-CALF came along and told us- NCBA kept saying everything was just great :!: As long as you have those getting greased palms running it you will hear no different.....
 

Latest posts

Top