exactly. With Montana Land Reliance, we had to spell out how we were going to use the land, where if ever we would want to have another homesite and basically promise to keep the place in agriculture and never sell off chunks of it for development. The Easement is easy to read and understand even for an idiot like me. When we started this process, we had to have a botanist come in and do a plant and animal survey. I thought that I was in for a bunch of rancher bashing when I saw her drive in in her VW bus with dogs wearing bandanas hanging out the windows. I expected the ranchers are bad, wildlife is good rhetoric while she munched her grainola. What I got after she was here for two weeks inventorying plants and animals was a lot of questions, such as "why don't you graze that pasture? Why this why that? And how did you train those elk to come out everytime I drive by?" She got to spend enough time out here to learn that ranchers care about the land more than people think and we live on it, we don't drive through it at 70 mph and think we know it all. The one thing that she thought was hilarious was when we told her that there had been a major loss of chipmunks in the last two years. What, you mean ranchers don't just shoot everything they see that they can't make money off of? You care about some little animals? Anyway the point I'm trying to make now is that more ranchers would be better off having a discussion with botanists, ecologists etc., as you are now doing. It opens the eyes of both sides.